Linq BoilerPlate:全部需要吗? [英] Linq BoilerPlate: Is all of it needed?
问题描述
我有以下代码可以正常工作:
I have the following code, which does work:
var dataSource = (from p in dv.ToTable().AsEnumerable() where filter(p) select p).AsDataView();
filter
是Func<DataRow, bool>
dv
是DataView
dataSource
用作DataGrid
的DataSource
.
filter
is a Func<DataRow, bool>
dv
is a DataView
dataSource
is being used as a DataSource
for a DataGrid
.
无论如何,我打电话给ToTable
,AsEnumerable
和AsDataView
有点不舒服,所以我想知道是否有办法减少电话数量.
Anyhow, it strikes me as a bit ugly that I am calling ToTable
, AsEnumerable
, and AsDataView
, so I was wondering if there is a way to reduce the number of calls.
这能做到吗?
编辑:DataGrid具有分页功能,我利用dataSource确定条目总数.我并不特别担心这样做的效率. dv
只有几千个项目,并且该表正在内存中维护.
The DataGrid has pagination, and I make use of the dataSource to determine the total number of entries. I'm not especially worried about the efficiency of this; dv
only has a few thousand items and the table is being maintained in memory.
推荐答案
一件事,我想说在这里使用查询表达式有点笨拙.您的代码等效于:
Well for one thing, I'd say that using a query expression is somewhat clumsy here. Your code is equivalent to:
var dataSource = dv.ToTable()
.AsEnumerable()
.Where(filter)
.AsDataView();
我想说的更清楚.
另一种选择是:
var dataSource = dv.Cast<DataRowView>()
.Select(rowView => rowView.Row)
.Where(filter)
.ToList();
这避免了构建DataTable
,因此也可能会更加高效(它将从视图中流式传输DataRowView
s并选择其基础的DataRow
s),但最后会构建一个List<DataRow>
.另一方面,它实际上不是在视图本身上起作用,因为它只是在选择基础行.这可能会或可能不会满足您的需求,具体取决于您的视图在做什么.
This avoids building a DataTable
, so may well be more efficient too (it'll just stream the DataRowView
s from the view and select their underlying DataRow
s) but builds a List<DataRow>
at the end. On the other hand, it's now not acting on the view itself, really - because it's just selecting the underlying rows. This may or may not do what you need, depending on what your view is doing.
这篇关于Linq BoilerPlate:全部需要吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!