开发语义Web应用程序 [英] Developing a Semantic Web Application

查看:100
本文介绍了开发语义Web应用程序的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

虽然我在使用ASP技术开发动态网站方面有一点经验,但是我是语义Web编程的新手,并且我打算建立一个基于语义Web技术的网站.我想开发一个搜索引擎, Web用户可以在其中从后端RDF三元商店查询关键字.我想使用Java和JSP来实现网站.我有以下问题:

Although i have a little bit of experience in developing dynamic websites using ASP technologies, but I am new to semantic web programming, and i intend to implement a website based on semantic web technology.I would like to develop a search engine, where a web user can query for keywords from the backend RDF triple store.I want to implement the website using Java and JSP.I have following questions:

  1. 我目前正在研究Jena框架和SPARQL,但是 我不确定我需要学习哪些其他技术 实施网站.
  2. RDF和OWL有什么区别,我经历了 很多网络资源,但我仍然感到困惑.根据我的理解 RDF和OWL都定义了概念之间的关系,但是OWL是 在定义关系方面更加丰富.
  3. 不同的OWL词汇(例如FOAF,SIOC等)的含义是什么? 我们需要这些词汇吗?
  4. Virtuso Open Link的确切目的是什么 软件( http://ods.openlinksw.com/dataspace/dav/wiki/Main/VirtJenaProvider )
  1. I am currently studying Jena framework and SPARQL to start with,but i am not sure what other technologies i need to study in order to implement the website.
  2. What is the difference between RDF and OWL, I have gone through a lot of web resources but i am still confused.As per my understanding RDF and OWL both define relationship between concepts but OWL is more rich in terms of defining relations.
  3. What is meant by different OWL Vocabularies like FOAF, SIOC etc.Why do we need these vocabularies?
  4. What exactly is the purpose of Virtuso Open Link Software(http://ods.openlinksw.com/dataspace/dav/wiki/Main/VirtJenaProvider)

任何帮助将不胜感激.

谢谢!

推荐答案

回复:您的第一个问题-为什么要使用RDF实施关键字搜索?关键字搜索不是语义性的,并且有许多已建立的关键字搜索框架和API,例如Lucene.

Re: your first question - why do you want to use RDF to implement a keyword search? Keyword search isn't semantic, and there are many established frameworks and APIs for keyword search, such as Lucene.

回复:比较RDF和OWL的第二个问题是比较苹果和橘子. RDF基本上是用于声明数据的,但是OWL是RDF之上的一个用于声明本体(方案)的层. RDFS(RDF架构)和OWL之间的比较更有意义,它们都针对本体层.

Re: your second question, comparing RDF and OWL is comparing apples and oranges. RDF is basically for declaring data, but OWL is a layer on top of RDF that is for declaring ontologies (schemas). A more meaningful comparison would be between RDFS (RDF Schema) and OWL, which both address the ontology layer.

示例:

在RDF中,您可能会说约翰·史密斯(John Smith)是一个年龄为"42"并已嫁给吉尔·史密斯(Jill Smith)的人.

In RDF you might state that John Smith is a Person who hasAge "42" and is marriedTo Jill Smith.

在RDFS或OWL中,您将声明Person是一个类,hasAge是一个属性(具有Person的域和xsd:integer的范围),而结婚的To是一个属性(具有Person的域和范围的).

In RDFS or OWL you would declare that Person is a class, hasAge is a property (with domain of Person and range of xsd:integer) and marriedTo is a property (with domain and range of Person).

在OWL中,您还可以声明namedTo是一个对称属性(如果A已绑定到B,则B必须已绑定到A). RDF功能不强大,因此您无法做出此特定声明,因此也无法推断对称属性等.

In OWL you can also declare that marriedTo is a symmetric property (if A is marriedTo B, then B must be marriedTo A). RDF isn't this powerful, so you can't make this particular statement, so can't make inferences about symmetric properties etc.

这篇关于开发语义Web应用程序的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆