我应该再学习Windows工作流? [英] Should I bother learning Windows Workflow?

查看:99
本文介绍了我应该再学习Windows工作流?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

好了,我已经学会了WPF和WCF和这是伟大的。我没有使用CardSpace麻烦,因为它可能不是要去起飞。

Okay, so I've learned WPF and WCF and that was great. I didn't bother with CardSpace because it's probably not gonna take off.

我应该费心的工作流程,..是值得吗?有什么大不了的?

Should i bother with Workflow,..is it worth it? What's the big deal?

推荐答案

这是值得学习的,或者至少理解WF。 WF提供了一种不同的模式进行构建的应用程序,一个范例其中的可以的成为主流的未来。 Enterprisey?是的,也许今天。但长期来看永丰,或至少它促进模式,有可能成为无处不在和普遍。使用工作流来描述程序可能是今天的阶段,面向对象和C ++的是,20年前。

It is worth learning or at least understanding WF. WF offers a different paradigm for building apps, a paradigm which may become mainstream in the future. Enterprisey? Yes, maybe today. But longer term WF or at least the paradigm it promotes, may become ubiquitous and universal. Using Workflows to describe programs may today be in the stage where OO and C++ was, 20 years ago.

学习新的事物拓宽你的想法。例如,即使你使用你的一天到一天的工作C#或Java,知道Lisp语言有助于拓宽你如何解决问题的思路。海事组织。 WF是相同的。

Learning a new thing broadens your thinking. For example, even if you use C# or Java in your day-to-day job, knowing Lisp helps broaden your thinking about how to solve problems. IMO. WF is the same.

第二个想法是这样想的投资者。如果你想提高你的价值作为一个程序员,无论是学习WF将取决于你是在市场上或作业上。WF技能,在你的空间,或在你的公司可能会或可能不值得你额外的努力。

A second thought is to think like an investor. If you want to raise the value of YOU as a programmer, whether to learn WF would depend on the market or job you are in. WF skills in your space or in your company may or may not be worth your extra effort.

这篇关于我应该再学习Windows工作流?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆