iOS应用被拒绝,因为没有IAP的用户购买订阅 [英] iOS app is rejected because of user buy subscription without IAP

查看:213
本文介绍了iOS应用被拒绝,因为没有IAP的用户购买订阅的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我在iOS平台上构建了一个工具应用程序.我想为用户创建三个级别.基本,专业和高级.每个级别提供不同的功能.因此,用户需要为专业和高级订阅计划付费.级别之间的区别是专业用户可以创建比基本用户更多的文档.

I build a tool app on iOS platform. I want create three level for users. basic, pro and premium. each level provide different functions. So user need pay for pro and premium subscription plan. the difference between level is pro user can create more document than basic user.

问题是我不想使用IAP,我不想苹果分享30%的收入,因此我创建了一个网站,允许用户通过Web支付订阅费用. 我之前3次批准了该应用程序,没有任何拒绝. 但是最近,Apple审核小组拒绝了我的应用,并提供了关注信息

The thing is I don't want use IAP, I don't want apple share the 30% revenue, so I created a website to let user pay the subscription through web. I got the app approved 3 times before, without any rejection. but recently, Apple review team reject my app with follow info

来自Apple 11.13-与应用程序中使用的购买或订阅的外部机制相关联的应用程序,例如转到网站上购买数字图书的购买"按钮,将被拒绝 11.13详细信息

From Apple 11.13 - Apps that link to external mechanisms for purchases or subscriptions to be used in the App, such as a "buy" button that goes to a web site to purchase a digital book, will be rejected 11.13 Details

我们注意到,您的应用程序提供了对要在该应用程序中使用的购买或订阅的外部机制的访问,这不符合《 App Store审查指南》.

We noticed that your app provides access to external mechanisms for purchases or subscriptions to be used in the app, which does not comply with the App Store Review Guidelines.

我非常确定我没有任何按钮或应用程序内链接可以将用户导航到网站进行付款. 我的应用程序确实通过API从网站上获取订阅级别,以按级别限制用户功能.我不太确定苹果是否不允许这样做. 我再次查看苹果评论指南并找到

I am very sure that I didn't have any button or link inside of app to navigate user to website for payment. My app do grab the subscription level from website by API to restrict user function by level. I am not very sure if this is not allowed by apple. I check apple review guideline again and find

11.14应用可以读取或播放在应用外部订阅或购买的已批准内容(特别是杂志,报纸,书籍,音频,音乐,视频和云存储),只要其中没有按钮或外部链接该应用程序购买批准的内容.对于在App内购买的内容,Apple只会获得部分收入

11.14 Apps can read or play approved content (specifically magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, video and cloud storage) that is subscribed to or purchased outside of the App, as long as there is no button or external link in the App to purchase the approved content. Apple will only receive a portion of revenues for content purchased inside the App

Kindle和Dropbox遵循11.14.他们从应用中删除了IAP,并允许用户从网站上购买内容.我可以知道他们正在遵循11.14.所以苹果批准了.

Kindle and dropbox are following 11.14. they removed IAP from app and let user buy content from website. I can tell they are following 11.14. so apple approve that.

但是11.14仅适用于杂志,报纸,书籍,音频,音乐,视频和云存储.虽然我不确定我的应用程序是否属于其中之一.但是我的应用程序与Evernote非常相似. Evernote在网站和IAP上都提供付款.

But 11.14 only works for magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, video and cloud storage. while I am not sure whether my app belongs one of them. But my app is very similar with Evernote. Evernote provide payment both on website and IAP.

所以我的问题是,如果Evernote从应用程序中删除IAP,仅允许用户从网站购买.苹果会拒绝吗?如果没有,则不应拒绝我的应用.

So my question is If Evernote remove IAP from app and only let user buy from website. will apple reject that? If not, then my app should not be rejected.

推荐答案

最终,这是您应该向Apple提出的问题.不同的评论抓住了不同的东西.尽管您可能没有按钮可以将人们吸引到您的网站上以支付订阅费用,但这听起来像网站的唯一目的是购买该应用程序的订阅(如果我错了,请随时纠正我) .如果是这样的话,我可以完全理解拒绝. Apple希望在应用程序中进行应用程序订阅的购买,这意味着要经过Apple并与他们打交道,并收取30%的费用.如果您创建网站的唯一目的是绕过Apple准则,那么它们最终将引起注意.

Ultimately this is a question that you should be asking Apple. Different reviews catch different things. Although you may not have a button to send people to your website to pay for the subscription, it kind of sounds like the only purpose of the website is to buy a subscription for the app (if i'm wrong feel free to correct me). If thats the case i can completely understand the rejection. Apple wants purchases made for subscriptions for the app to be made in the app which means going through Apple and dealing with them taking %30. If you make a website with the sole purpose of bypassing Apples guidelines then they are going to notice eventually.

从声音上看,您的应用程序与Evernote之间的区别还在于Evernote还有其他与订阅相关的平台.该应用恰好是用户可以从订阅中受益的另一个地方.

Also the difference between your app and Evernote from the sounds of it, is that Evernote has other platforms that the subscription relates too. The app just happens to be another place the user can benefit from the subscription.

最后,我主要建议您首先考虑用户体验.我不想削掉%30,但是您可能最终会通过在应用程序中添加IAP并放弃%30,然后根本没有应用程序内订阅机制来获得更多订阅.

At the end of the day i would mostly recommend that you think about the user experience first. I get not wanting to shave off %30, but you may end up gaining more subscriptions by having IAP in your app and giving away the %30 then by not having an in app subscription mechanism at all.

这篇关于iOS应用被拒绝,因为没有IAP的用户购买订阅的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆