由于用户购买订阅而没有 IAP，iOS 应用程序被拒绝 [英] iOS app is rejected because of user buy subscription without IAP

问题描述

我在 iOS 平台上构建了一个工具应用程序.我想为用户创建三个级别.基本版、专业版和高级版.每个级别提供不同的功能.所以用户需要为专业和高级订阅计划付费.级别之间的区别是专业用户可以创建比基本用户更多的文档.

I build a tool app on iOS platform. I want create three level for users. basic, pro and premium. each level provide different functions. So user need pay for pro and premium subscription plan. the difference between level is pro user can create more document than basic user.

问题是我不想使用 IAP，我不想让苹果分享 30% 的收入，所以我创建了一个网站让用户通过网络支付订阅费用.我之前获得了该应用程序的 3 次批准，没有任何拒绝.但最近，Apple 审核团队拒绝了我的应用并提供关注信息

The thing is I don't want use IAP, I don't want apple share the 30% revenue, so I created a website to let user pay the subscription through web. I got the app approved 3 times before, without any rejection. but recently, Apple review team reject my app with follow info

来自苹果11.13 - 链接到要在应用程序中使用的购买或订阅的外部机制的应用程序，例如进入网站购买电子书的购买"按钮，将被拒绝11.13 详情

From Apple 11.13 - Apps that link to external mechanisms for purchases or subscriptions to be used in the App, such as a "buy" button that goes to a web site to purchase a digital book, will be rejected 11.13 Details

我们注意到您的应用提供了对应用中使用的购买或订阅的外部机制的访问，这不符合 App Store 审核指南.

We noticed that your app provides access to external mechanisms for purchases or subscriptions to be used in the app, which does not comply with the App Store Review Guidelines.

我非常确定我的应用程序内没有任何按钮或链接可以将用户导航到网站进行付款.我的应用程序确实通过 API 从网站获取订阅级别，以按级别限制用户功能.我不太确定这是否是苹果不允许的.我再次查看苹果评论指南，发现

I am very sure that I didn't have any button or link inside of app to navigate user to website for payment. My app do grab the subscription level from website by API to restrict user function by level. I am not very sure if this is not allowed by apple. I check apple review guideline again and find

11.14 应用程序可以阅读或播放在应用程序之外订阅或购买的批准内容(特别是杂志、报纸、书籍、音频、音乐、视频和云存储)，只要其中没有按钮或外部链接应用程序购买批准的内容.Apple 只会从 App 内购买的内容中获得部分收入

11.14 Apps can read or play approved content (specifically magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, video and cloud storage) that is subscribed to or purchased outside of the App, as long as there is no button or external link in the App to purchase the approved content. Apple will only receive a portion of revenues for content purchased inside the App

Kindle 和 Dropbox 遵循 11.14.他们从应用程序中删除了 IAP，让用户从网站上购买内容.我可以看出他们正在关注 11.14.所以苹果同意了.

Kindle and dropbox are following 11.14. they removed IAP from app and let user buy content from website. I can tell they are following 11.14. so apple approve that.

但 11.14 仅适用于杂志、报纸、书籍、音频、音乐、视频和云存储.虽然我不确定我的应用程序是否属于其中之一.但我的应用程序与印象笔记非常相似.Evernote 提供网站和 IAP 两种支付方式.

But 11.14 only works for magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, video and cloud storage. while I am not sure whether my app belongs one of them. But my app is very similar with Evernote. Evernote provide payment both on website and IAP.

所以我的问题是如果 Evernote 从应用程序中删除 IAP 并只让用户从网站上购买.苹果会拒绝吗?如果没有，那么我的应用程序不应该被拒绝.

So my question is If Evernote remove IAP from app and only let user buy from website. will apple reject that? If not, then my app should not be rejected.

推荐答案

最终，您应该向 Apple 提出这个问题.不同的评论捕捉不同的东西.虽然您可能没有将人们发送到您的网站以支付订阅费用的按钮，但听起来该网站的唯一目的是购买该应用程序的订阅(如果我错了，请随时纠正我).如果是这样的话，我可以完全理解拒绝.Apple 希望在应用程序中为应用程序订阅进行的购买，这意味着通过 Apple 并与他们打交道，需要 %30.如果您制作网站的唯一目的是绕过 Apple 的指南，那么他们最终会注意到.

Ultimately this is a question that you should be asking Apple. Different reviews catch different things. Although you may not have a button to send people to your website to pay for the subscription, it kind of sounds like the only purpose of the website is to buy a subscription for the app (if i'm wrong feel free to correct me). If thats the case i can completely understand the rejection. Apple wants purchases made for subscriptions for the app to be made in the app which means going through Apple and dealing with them taking %30. If you make a website with the sole purpose of bypassing Apples guidelines then they are going to notice eventually.

您的应用程序和 Evernote 之间的区别还在于它的声音，是 Evernote 也有与订阅相关的其他平台.该应用恰好是用户可以从订阅中受益的另一个地方.

Also the difference between your app and Evernote from the sounds of it, is that Evernote has other platforms that the subscription relates too. The app just happens to be another place the user can benefit from the subscription.

归根结底，我主要建议您首先考虑用户体验.我不想削减 %30，但您最终可能会通过在您的应用中使用 IAP 并赠送 %30 来获得更多订阅，然后根本没有应用内订阅机制.

At the end of the day i would mostly recommend that you think about the user experience first. I get not wanting to shave off %30, but you may end up gaining more subscriptions by having IAP in your app and giving away the %30 then by not having an in app subscription mechanism at all.

这篇关于由于用户购买订阅而没有 IAP，iOS 应用程序被拒绝的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！