C ++ 11标准和免费草案N3337之间的段号是否不同？ [英] Do section numbers differ between the C++11 standard and the gratis draft N3337?

问题描述

C ++ 11标准ISO / IEC 14882：2011 和以后免费下载的草案 N3337？

要明确：我的问题不是是否建议对于该问题，请使用N3337代替官方标准在Stackoverflow上已经得到了很好的回答； 但只是编号是否不同。

To be clear: my question is not whether it is advisable to use N3337 in place of the official standard, for that question has already been well answered on Stackoverflow; but only whether the numbering differs.

作为参考，请这是我找到的最相关的非Stackoverflow答案（如果您点击链接，请专门参考日期为 Sun Mar 18，12 06:41 PM的项目）。另外，作为参考，@ Nemo提请注意相关的Stackoverflow问题，并在此处获得答案。

For reference, here is the most nearly relevant non-Stackoverflow answer I find (if you follow the link, refer specifically to the item dated "Sun Mar 18, 12 06:41 PM"). Also for reference, @Nemo draws attention to a related Stackoverflow question with answers here.

推荐答案

N3290受保护，被委员会认为是最终草案。我尚未购买ISO / IEC标准并进行了比较，以确保它与N3290相同。我也没有听到有关该委员会是否相同的讨论。

N3290, which is protected, is considered by the committee to be the final draft. I have not purchased the ISO/IEC standard and compared them to ensure that it is identical to N3290. I have also not heard any discussion on the committee questioning that it is identical.

我比较了N3290和N3337的交叉引用。交叉引用包含section.tags和部分编号的完整列表。它们是相同的，除了两个小的更改：

I've compared the cross references of N3290 and N3337. The cross references contain a complete list of the section.tags and section numbers. They are identical except for two minor changes:

N3290具有：

unord.map.modifers 23.5.4.4
unord.multimap.modifers 23.5.5.3

N3337具有：

unord.map.modifiers 23.5.4.4
unord.multimap.modifiers 23.5.5.3

（修饰符->修饰符）

我不了解段落编号。但是此处是编辑器关于所做更改的报告自最终草案以来。

I do not know about paragraph numbers. But here is a report from the editor concerning the changes made since the final draft.

这篇关于C ++ 11标准和免费草案N3337之间的段号是否不同？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！