您如何处理“文件过多"?在Bash工作时出现问题? [英] How do you handle the "Too many files" problem when working in Bash?

查看:43
本文介绍了您如何处理“文件过多"?在Bash工作时出现问题?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

很多时候,我必须处理包含成千上万个文件的目录,进行文本匹配,替换等.如果我走标准路线,说

I many times have to work with directories containing hundreds of thousands of files, doing text matching, replacing and so on. If I go the standard route of, say

grep foo *

我收到太多文件错误消息,所以我最终还是这样做

I get the too many files error message, so I end up doing

for i in *; do grep foo $i; done

find ../path/ | xargs -I{} grep foo "{}"

但这并不是最佳选择(每个文件都创建一个新的grep进程).

But these are less than optimal (create a new grep process per each file).

这似乎更限制了程序可以接收的参数大小,因为for循环中的*可以正常工作.但是,无论如何,处理此问题的正确方法是什么?

This looks like more of a limitation in the size of the arguments programs can receive, because the * in the for loop works alright. But, in any case, what's the proper way to handle this?

PS:不要告诉我做grep -r,我知道这一点,我在考虑没有递归选项的工具.

PS: Don't tell me to do grep -r instead, I know about that, I'm thinking about tools that do not have a recursive option.

推荐答案

在较新版本的findutils中,find可以完成xargs的工作(包括glomming行为,因此仅使用所需的grep进程):

In newer versions of findutils, find can do the work of xargs (including the glomming behavior, such that only as many grep processes as needed are used):

find ../path -exec grep foo '{}' +

使用 + 而不是; 作为最后一个参数会触发此行为.

The use of + rather than ; as the last argument triggers this behavior.

这篇关于您如何处理“文件过多"?在Bash工作时出现问题?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆