为什么隐式转换从超类允许继承? [英] Why is implicit conversion allowed from superclass to subclass?
本文介绍了为什么隐式转换从超类允许继承?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
谁能告诉我,为什么与行//编译编译,为什么符合//不能编译不?
Can someone tell me why the line with "//Compiles" compiles, and why the line with "//Doesn't Compile" does not?
我不明白为什么会隐式转换为B,不是倒过来。
I don't understand why A would be implicitly convertible to B, not the other way round.
public class SomeClass {
static public void Test() {
AClass a = new AClass();
BClass b = new BClass();
a = b; // Compiles
b = a; // Doesn't compile
}
}
public class AClass {
public void AMethod() {
Console.WriteLine("AMethod");
}
}
public class BClass : AClass {
public void BMethod() {
Console.WriteLine("BMethod");
}
}
谢谢!
推荐答案
由于B做出一切一做这一点,但一个不一定做的一切,B做出。想想这样说:
Because B does everything that A does but A does not necessarily do everything that B does. Think of it this way:
AClass --> Shape
BClass --> Circle
Shape a = new Shape();
Circle b = new Circle();
a = b; // works because a is of type "Shape" and a circle is a specific shape
b = a; // doesn't work because b is of type "Circle" and a could be a square.
这篇关于为什么隐式转换从超类允许继承?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!
查看全文