使用 Service Worker Cache API 和常规浏览器缓存有什么区别? [英] What's the difference between using the Service Worker Cache API and regular browser cache?

问题描述

在我的渐进式 Web 应用程序中，我应该在 Service Worker 中为我的静态资产使用缓存 API，还是应该仅依靠浏览器的本机缓存控制来实现这些?有什么区别?

In my Progressive Web App, should I be using the Cache API in a service worker for my static assets, or should I just rely on the browser's native cache control for these? What's the difference?

推荐答案

Service Worker 缓存 API 的一个主要优点是它为您提供比内置浏览器缓存更详细的控制.例如，您的 Service Worker 可以在用户首次运行您的 Web 应用程序时缓存多个请求，包括他们尚未访问的资产.这将加快后续请求.您还可以实现自己的缓存控制逻辑，确保将被认为重要的资产保留在缓存中，同时删除较少使用的数据.

A major advantage of the service worker cache API is that it gives you more detailed control than the built-in browser cache does. For example, your service worker can cache multiple requests when the user first runs your web app, including assets that they have not yet visited. This will speed up subsequent requests. You can also implement your own cache control logic, ensuring that assets that are considered important are kept in the cache while deleting less-used data.

这篇关于使用 Service Worker Cache API 和常规浏览器缓存有什么区别?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！