哈德森和詹金斯如何选择? [英] How to choose between Hudson and Jenkins?

查看:24
本文介绍了哈德森和詹金斯如何选择?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我花了一个小时左右才发现 Hudson 最近才开设了分支(2011 年 1 月)
我不知道现在每个分支的变化有多快,但更重要的是,每个分支的方向是什么,关键点是什么,以便人们可以在哪个分支之间做出选择?

It took me an hour or so to work out Hudson has only branched recently (Jan/2011)
I have no idea how rapid the change of each branch is now, but more importantly, what is the direction each branch is taking and what are key points so one could make a choice between which to go with?

有人有产品路线图和功能差异的链接吗?

Anybody have links to product roadmap and feature differences?

推荐答案

使用 Jenkins.

Jenkins 是 Hudson 核心开发人员的最近的分支.要了解原因,您需要了解项目的历史.它最初是开源的,并得到 Sun 的支持.就像 Sun 所做的很多事情一样,它是相当开放的,但也有一些善意的疏忽.源码、追踪器、网站等均由Sun托管在其相对封闭的java.net平台上.

Jenkins is the recent fork by the core developers of Hudson. To understand why, you need to know the history of the project. It was originally open source and supported by Sun. Like much of what Sun did, it was fairly open, but there was a bit of benign neglect. The source, trackers, website, etc. were hosted by Sun on their relatively closed java.net platform.

然后甲骨文收购了 Sun.出于各种原因,甲骨文并不羞于利用它所认为的资产.其中包括对 Hudson 物流平台的一些控制,尤其是对 Hudson 名称的控制.许多用户和贡献者对此感到不舒服并决定离开.

Then Oracle bought Sun. For various reasons Oracle has not been shy about leveraging what it perceives as its assets. Those include some control over the logistic platform of Hudson, and particularly control over the Hudson name. Many users and contributors weren't comfortable with that and decided to leave.

所以这归结为 Hudson vs Jenkins 提供的内容.Oracle 的 Hudson 和 Jenkins 都有代码.Hudson 拥有 Oracle 和 Sonatype 的企业支持和品牌.Jenkins 拥有大部分核心开发人员、社区以及(到目前为止)更多的实际工作.

So it comes down to what Hudson vs Jenkins offers. Both Oracle's Hudson and Jenkins have the code. Hudson has Oracle and Sonatype's corporate support and the brand. Jenkins has most of the core developers, the community, and (so far) much more actual work.

阅读我链接到顶部的那个帖子,然后 阅读 其余 这些 按时间顺序 订单.为了平衡,您可以阅读 Hudson/Oracle 承担.我很清楚谁在防守,谁对这个项目有真正的意图.

Read that post I linked up top, then read the rest of these in chronological order. For balance you can read the Hudson/Oracle take on it. It's pretty clear to me who is playing defensive and who has real intentions for the project.

这篇关于哈德森和詹金斯如何选择?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆