2012年哈德森对阵詹金斯 [英] Hudson vs Jenkins in 2012

问题描述

在 2011 年 Hudson 和 Jenkins 的情况如下(恕我直言)- Hudson 有点稳定，但 Jenkins 的发展要快一点.
2012年的哈德森vs詹金斯"现在情况如何?

In 2011 situation with Hudson and Jenkins was following(IMHO) - Hudson was a little bit stable, but development of Jenkins was a little bit faster.
What is the situation with "Hudson vs Jenkins" now in 2012?

推荐答案

在稳定性方面，一年多来 Jenkins 提供了一个 长期支持 (LTS) 版本，适用于希望对所安装软件的稳定性和支持更加放心的人.

In terms of stability, for over a year Jenkins has offered a Long-Term Support (LTS) version for people who want to be more assured about the stability and support of the software they're installing.

每三个月左右，就会选择一个被 Jenkins 用户社区认为运行良好的先前版本.然后这个版本被分支，任何重要的修复(已经过实战测试")都被反向移植到这个 Jenkins 版本中，然后这个版本得到了不同人和公司的额外测试.一旦准备好发布，它就会成为新的 LTS 版本.

Every three months or so, a previous release is selected which has been deemed as working well by the community of Jenkins users. This version is then branched, any important fixes (which have been "battle-tested") are backported into this Jenkins version, and then this release gets extra testing by various people and companies. Once it's ready for release, this becomes the new LTS version.

随着新的高优先级修复的出现，这些修复被反向移植到 LTS 版本.

As new high-priority fixes come along, these are backported to the LTS version.

众多 Jenkins 的大用户坚持使用 LTS 路线发布，并且根据公开的Jenkins 使用统计，有数千个部署正在使用它.

Numerous large users of Jenkins stick to the LTS line of releases, and according to the public Jenkins usage statistics, several thousand deployments are using it.

这应该意味着您正在下载的 LTS 版本比从通常的每周发布行中随机选择的版本更稳定.

This should mean the LTS version you are downloading is even more stable than a random version chosen from the usual weekly release line.

除了统计数据之外，与 Hudson 相比，Jenkins 使用情况、社区规模、开发水平、新功能添加率、新插件数量和邮件列表活动的情况似乎没有改变(即 Jenkins 仍然存在)更进一步).

Beyond the statistics, the situation regarding Jenkins usage, community size, its level of development, rate of new features added, number of new plugins and mailing list activity in comparison to Hudson doesn't seem to have changed (i.e. Jenkins remains ever-further ahead).

基本上，之前的讨论中的大部分观点仍然适用，尽管 Hudson 最初的企业支持似乎已经缓和了一些.

Basically, most of the points made in this previous discussion still apply, though the initial corporate support of Hudson appears to have subsided a little.

这篇关于2012年哈德森对阵詹金斯的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！