是否使用 std::vector<bool>;C++ 中的对象可以接受，还是我应该使用替代方法? [英] Is the use of std::vector&lt;bool&gt; objects in C++ acceptable, or should I use an alternative?

问题描述

我正在使用用户定义的位数(我持有一个 3 维位数组，因此大小按立方增加 - 假设不少于 512 位)，并且需要分别翻转它们.现在，只是在计算机上，我使用 bool 类型，因为内存不是问题.我确实计划将来将代码移至微控制器，因此处理能力和内存要求可能是一个问题.不过现在，我只想要速度.

I'm working with a user-defined quantity of bits (I'm holding a three-dimensional array of bits, so the size increases cubically - assume no less then 512 bits), and need to flip them each individually. Right now, just on a computer, I'm using the bool type, since memory isn't an issue. I do plan to move the code to a microcontroller in the future, and so processing power and memory requirements may be an issue. Right now though, I just want speed.

然后我从 C++ STLstd::bitset 对象a>，但我无法在运行时定义位集的大小.然后我发现 std::vector<byte> 有一个特殊的初始化程序将它们存储为位(而不是整个字节或 4 个字节)，但后来发现 此部分在维基百科中:

I then found the std::bitset object from the C++ STL, but I can't define a bitset's size at runtime. I then found that the std::vector<byte> has a special initializer to store them as bits (instead of entire bytes, or 4 bytes) but then found this section in Wikipedia:

标准库定义了 vector 模板的特化对于 bool.该专业的描述表明实现应该打包元素，以便每个 bool 只使用一点的内存.这被广泛认为是一个错误.[...] C++ 标准委员会和库工作组普遍认为 vector<bool> 应该被弃用并随后从标准库中删除，而该功能将重新引入一个不同的名字.

The Standard Library defines a specialization of the vector template for bool. The description of this specialization indicates that the implementation should pack the elements so that every bool only uses one bit of memory. This is widely considered a mistake. [...] There is a general consensus among the C++ Standard Committee and the Library Working Group that vector<bool> should be deprecated and subsequently removed from the standard library, while the functionality will be reintroduced under a different name.

现在，您可能会看到我想要使用 vector<bool> 对象，但在阅读完之后，我正在考虑使用其他东西.唯一的问题是我不确定要使用 什么.我很好奇为什么他们说应该重新引入功能(尽管使用不同的名称).

Now, you can probably see my want for using a vector<bool> object, but after reading that, I'm considering using something else. The only problem is that I'm not sure what to use. I was curious though why they state that the functionality should be re-introduced (albeit under a different name).

所以，我的问题是，vector<bool> 对象的使用是否可以接受(因为它们是 STL 的一部分)?它们是 C++ 标准的一部分吗?

So, my question is, would the use of vector<bool> objects be acceptable (being that they are a part of the STL)? Are they a part of the C++ standard?

如果它们的使用不可接受，是否有可接受的替代解决方案(在我之外自己定义一个特殊容器)?我自己有一些想法，但我只是好奇是否有人有更好的解决方案.另外，我想避免使用大型库(同样，我希望最终将此代码移植到微控制器).

If their use is not acceptable, is there an acceptable, alternative solution (outside me defining a special container myself)? I have a few ideas myself, but I'm just curious if anyone has a better solution. Also, I would like to avoid using large libraries (again, I want to eventually port this code to a microcontroller).

推荐答案

vector<bool>没有什么问题，只是它不等价于vector<T> were T 是等价于 bool 的整数类型.这仅显示在性能(CPU 一次仅访问字节，其中在 vector 中，每个元素都存储在一个位中)和内存访问(对 的第一个元素的引用>vector<bool> 不等同于任何其他 vector<T> 的数组.

There's nothing wrong with vector<bool>, except that it isn't equivalent to a vector<T> were T is the integer type equivalent to bool. This only shows in performance (CPUs only access bytes at a time, where in a vector<bool> every element is stored in one bit) and memory access (a reference to a first element of a vector<bool> is not equivalent to an array like with any other vector<T>.

不幸的是，它是标准的一部分:参见 23.3.7 (C++0x FDIS) 部分.

It is part of the Standard, unfortunately: see section 23.3.7 (C++0x FDIS).

这篇关于是否使用 std::vector<bool>;C++ 中的对象可以接受，还是我应该使用替代方法?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！