选择一个Windows自动化的脚本语言。 AutoIt的VS AutoHotkey的 [英] Choosing a Windows automation script language. AutoIt vs Autohotkey

查看:1888
本文介绍了选择一个Windows自动化的脚本语言。 AutoIt的VS AutoHotkey的的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我需要选择一个Windows自动化程序。你推荐哪一个? AutoIt的 AutoHotkey的,还是其他?

I need to choose a Windows automation program. Which one do you recommend? AutoIt, AutoHotkey, or other?

我看过的 的AutoIt的/ AutoHotkey的比较 的。这是一个有趣的历史,但没有一个明确的建议。搜索在谷歌留下的赢家(约312K命中为AutoHotkey的的Windows VS 482k命中AutoIt的视窗)。堆栈 溢出有标记为AutoIt的VS 18 AutoHotkey的15个问题。

I have read An AutoIt / AutoHotkey comparison. It is an interesting history, but without a clear recommendation. Searching on Google leaves a winner (around 312k hits for AutoHotkey Windows vs 482k hits for AutoIt Windows). On Stack Overflow there are 15 questions tagged as AutoIt vs 18 for AutoHotkey.

我感兴趣的程序员你的意见。你认为哪一个更容易使用,更可部署的和更强大的在功能方面?

I am interested on your opinion as programmers. Which one do you think is easier to use, more deployable and more powerful in terms of functionality?

注:我已经使用AutoHotkey的供个人使用。所以,我最初的preference就是这个。

Note: I have already used AutoHotkey for personal use. So my initial preference is for this.

推荐答案

我用两个非常多。

AutoHotkey的是管理热键和基本GUI自动化非常好。它的语法是可怕的,它并不意味着更大的应用程序。

AutoHotKey is very good at managing hotkeys and basic GUI automation. It's syntax is horrible and it's not meant for bigger applications.

AutoIt的几乎每一个功能都有的AutoHotkey以及更多。 COM自动化支持,数组和pretty漂亮的UDF(用户定义函数)库。这是更难的AutoIt构建复杂的热键。

AutoIt has almost every feature AutoHotKey has and much more. COM-automation support, arrays and a pretty nice UDF (User Defined Functions) library. It's harder to build complex hotkeys in AutoIt.

这篇关于选择一个Windows自动化的脚本语言。 AutoIt的VS AutoHotkey的的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆