功能推力迭代CUDA的说法 [英] function as argument of thrust iterator CUDA

查看:292
本文介绍了功能推力迭代CUDA的说法的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我想实现使用CUDA :: Thurst迭代器,解决了一堆在GPU方程的GPU上运行微分方程求解程序,要到细节,这里是一小块code的:

 的#include<推力/ device_vector.h>
    #包括LT&;推力/ transform.h>
    #包括LT&;推力/ sequence.h>
    #包括LT&;推力/ copy.h>
    #包括LT&;推力/ fill.h>
    #包括LT&;推力/ replace.h>
    #包括LT&;推力/ functional.h>    #包括LT&;推力/ for_each.h>
    #包括LT&;推力/ device_vector.h>
    #包括LT&;推力/迭代器/ zip_iterator.h>
   #包括LT&;&iostream的GT;
   #包括LT&;&math.h中GT;
   __host__ __device__浮动F(浮法X,浮法Y)
   {
     返回COS(Y)* SIN(X);
   }   结构euler_functor
   {
   常量浮动H;   euler_functor(浮点_H):H(_H){};   __host__ __device__
   浮动运算符()(浮点(* F)(双,双),常量浮动&放大器; X,常量浮动&放大器; Y){常量
   Y + = H *(* F)(X,Y);
   X + = H;
   }
   };
   INT主要(无效)
   {
   //分配3 device_vectors有10个元素
   推力:: device_vector<&诠释GT; X(10);
   // initilaize随机vaues
   推力::生成(X.begin(),X.end(),RAND);
   //申请欧拉对于x的每个元素
   推力:: for_each的(X.begin(),X.end(),euler_functor(F,0.0,X));
   //打印值
   的for(int i = 0;我小于10;我++)的std ::法院LT&;< X [1] - ;&下;的std :: ENDL;   }

但是,当我编译


  

NVCC euler.cu -o euler.x -lm
  出现以下错误:


  lala.cu(29):错误:显式类型缺失(INT假设)lala.cu(29):错误:预期;lala.cu(33):错误:EX pression必须修改的左值lala.cu(34):错误:EX pression必须修改的左值lala.cu(35):警告:在非void函数的末尾缺少return语句euler_functor ::运算符()lala.cu(46):错误:没有合适的构造存在,从浮动(浮动,浮动)到euler_functor转换lala.cu(46):错误:预期)

现在看来似乎是在路上无法使用的函数指针我想?

有关实施欧拉程序,使用迭代器将是非常美联社preciated运行它更好的方式sugestions。

是前一种方法partability和性能之间的良好折衷?

在年底有望对我来说,理想的解决方案是能够定义指针数组功能,如:

 的typedef INT(* foo_ptr_t)(INT);
foo_ptr_t foo_ptr_array [2];INT F1(INT);
INT F2(INT);
foo_ptr_array [0] = F1;
foo_ptr_array [1] = f2的;
foo_ptr_array [0](1);

要通过foo_ptr_array作为参数传递给欧拉仿函数。这可能吗?

感谢您的回答。

更多钞票的改进:

更多钞票是在定义的元组一组耦合微分方程的fucntors我尝试以下的方法吗?我可以从数值的方法来soution得到一些错误信息?

这将是


解决方案

最后,你所要求采取 __设备__ 函数参数在主机code,然后将它作为(功能)的指针,在什么是最终一个内核参数,以产生推力(引擎盖下)。

非法以取的地址的 __设备__ 函数参数在主机code,所以传递一个 __设备__ 函数指针作为参数这种方法是行不通的。

这可能是通过创建额外的 __ __设备变量(指针)存储设备上的函数指针来解决这个问题。然后使用 cudaGetSymbolAddress 来建立指针到指针的表功能。这将需要运行precursor内核建立函数指针设备。这似乎相当混乱。

有可能是更简单的参数化函数子来选择基于所述参数的装置的功能。艾克这样的:

 的#include<推力/ device_vector.h>
   #包括LT&;推力/ transform.h>
   #包括LT&;推力/ sequence.h>
   #包括LT&;推力/ copy.h>
   #包括LT&;推力/ fill.h>
   #包括LT&;推力/ replace.h>
   #包括LT&;推力/ functional.h>
   #包括LT&;推力/ for_each.h>
   #包括LT&;推力/迭代器/ zip_iterator.h>   #包括LT&;&iostream的GT;
   #包括LT&;&math.h中GT;
   __host__ __device__浮动F1(浮X)
   {
     返回SINF(X);
   }   __host__ __device__浮动F2(浮X)
   {
     返回cosf(x)的;
   }
   结构euler_functor
   {
     无符号H;     euler_functor(无符号_H):H(_H){};     __host__ __device__
     void运算符()(浮动&安培; Y){常量
       如果(H == 1)Y = F1(Y);
       否则,如果(H == 2)Y = F2(Y);
     }
   };
   INT主要(无效)
   {
     const的无符号的N = 8;
     //分配3 device_vectors有10个元素
     推力:: device_vector<浮动> X(N);
     // initilaize随机vaues
     推力::序列(X.begin(),X.end(),0.0(浮点)(6.283 /(浮点)N));
     //申请欧拉对于x的每个元素
     推力::的for_each(X.begin(),X.end(),euler_functor(1));
     //打印值
     的for(int i = 0; I< N;我++)的std ::法院LT&;< X [1] - ;&下;的std :: ENDL;     性病::法院LT&;< ******************<<的std :: ENDL;     推力::序列(X.begin(),X.end(),0.0(浮点)(6.283 /(浮点)N));
     //申请欧拉对于x的每个元素
     推力::的for_each(X.begin(),X.end(),euler_functor(2));
     //打印值
     的for(int i = 0; I< N;我++)的std ::法院LT&;< X [1] - ;&下;的std :: ENDL;   }

I am trying to implement ODEs solver routines running on GPUs using CUDA::Thurst iterators to solve a bunch of equations in the GPU, going to the details, here is a small piece of code:

    #include <thrust/device_vector.h>
    #include <thrust/transform.h> 
    #include <thrust/sequence.h>
    #include <thrust/copy.h> 
    #include <thrust/fill.h>
    #include <thrust/replace.h>
    #include <thrust/functional.h>

    #include <thrust/for_each.h>
    #include <thrust/device_vector.h>
    #include <thrust/iterator/zip_iterator.h>


   #include <iostream>
   #include <math.h>


   __host__ __device__ float f(float x, float y)
   {
     return cos(y)*sin(x);
   }



   struct euler_functor
   {
   const float h;

   euler_functor(float _h) : h(_h) {};

   __host__ __device__
   float operator()( float(*f)(double,double),const float& x, const float& y) const {
   y +=  h * (*f)( x, y );
   x += h;
   }
   };


   int main(void)
   {
   // allocate three device_vectors with 10 elements
   thrust::device_vector<int> X(10);
   // initilaize to random vaues
   thrust::generate(X.begin(), X.end(), rand);
   // apply euler for each element of X
   thrust::for_each(X.begin(),X.end(),euler_functor(f,0.0,X));
   // print the values
   for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) std::cout<< X[i]<< std::endl;

   }

But when I compile

nvcc euler.cu -o euler.x -lm the following errors occurs:

    lala.cu(29): error: explicit type is missing ("int" assumed)

lala.cu(29): error: expected a ";"

lala.cu(33): error: expression must be a modifiable lvalue

lala.cu(34): error: expression must be a modifiable lvalue

lala.cu(35): warning: missing return statement at end of non-void function "euler_functor::operator()"

lala.cu(46): error: no suitable constructor exists to convert from "float (float, float)" to "euler_functor"

lala.cu(46): error: expected a ")"

it seems like it is not possible use pointers to functions in the way I am trying?

sugestions for better ways to implement the Euler procedure and run it using iterators will be very appreciated.

is the former approach a good compromise between partability and performance?

At the end hopefully the ideal solution for me is be able to define an array of pointer to functions like:

typedef int (*foo_ptr_t)( int );
foo_ptr_t foo_ptr_array[2];

int f1( int );
int f2( int );
foo_ptr_array[0] = f1;
foo_ptr_array[1] = f2;
foo_ptr_array[0]( 1 );

To pass foo_ptr_array as argument to the euler functor. Is it possible?

Thanks for Answer.

Posible improvement:

Is posible define the a set coupled differential equations as fucntors over tuples as I try in following approach? Can I get some error information from the numerical approach to the soution?

It would be

解决方案

Ultimately, you are asking to take a __device__ function argument in host code, and then pass it as a (function) pointer, in what is ultimately (under the hood) a kernel argument, generated by thrust.

It is illegal to take the address of a __device__ function argument in host code, so passing a __device__ function pointer as an argument this way won't work.

It might be possible to work around this by creating additional __device__ variables (pointers) to store function pointers on the device. Then use cudaGetSymbolAddress to build a table of pointers-to-pointers to functions. This would necessitate running a precursor kernel to set up the function pointers on the device. It seems rather messy.

It might be simpler to parameterize the functor to select a device function based on the parameter. Lke this:

   #include <thrust/device_vector.h>
   #include <thrust/transform.h>
   #include <thrust/sequence.h>
   #include <thrust/copy.h>
   #include <thrust/fill.h>
   #include <thrust/replace.h>
   #include <thrust/functional.h>
   #include <thrust/for_each.h>
   #include <thrust/iterator/zip_iterator.h>

   #include <iostream>
   #include <math.h>


   __host__ __device__ float f1(float x)
   {
     return sinf(x);
   }

   __host__ __device__ float f2(float x)
   {
     return cosf(x);
   }




   struct euler_functor
   {
     unsigned h;

     euler_functor(unsigned _h) : h(_h) {};

     __host__ __device__
     void operator()(float &y) const  {
       if (h == 1) y = f1(y);
       else if (h == 2) y = f2(y);
     }
   };


   int main(void)
   {
     const unsigned N = 8;
     // allocate three device_vectors with 10 elements
     thrust::device_vector<float> X(N);
     // initilaize to random vaues
     thrust::sequence(X.begin(), X.end(),  0.0f, (float)(6.283/(float)N));
     // apply euler for each element of X
     thrust::for_each(X.begin(),X.end(),euler_functor(1));
     // print the values
     for(int i = 0; i < N; i++) std::cout<< X[i]<< std::endl;

     std::cout << "******************" << std::endl;

     thrust::sequence(X.begin(), X.end(),  0.0f, (float)(6.283/(float)N));
     // apply euler for each element of X
     thrust::for_each(X.begin(),X.end(),euler_functor(2));
     // print the values
     for(int i = 0; i < N; i++) std::cout<< X[i]<< std::endl;

   }

这篇关于功能推力迭代CUDA的说法的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆