原始STL和最终在C ++标准库中的那些部分之间的具体差异是什么？ [英] What are the specific differences between the original STL and those parts of it that ended up in the C++ Standard Library?

问题描述

我想知道 SGI 发布的STL与ISO C ++之间的具体差异是什么标准库。由此问题提供，而不是在所有回答此问题。

I'd like to know what the specific differences are between the STL as released by SGI and the ISO C++ standard library. Prompted by this question and not at all answered by this question.

一些区别很明显，例如 slist 和 / code>类，从来没有使它成为标准。我还在寻找更微妙的差异，例如方法的返回值/参数差异，或不同的复杂度要求，或不同的迭代器无效条件。

Some differences are obvious, such as the slist and hash_set classes that never made it into the standard. I'm also looking for more subtle differences, such as return value/parameter differences on methods, or different complexity requirements, or different iterator invalidation conditions.

推荐答案

SGI STL在C ++标准中缺少的东西缺少包括

SGI STL stuff "missing" in the C++ standard includes

• slist


• bit_vector


• hash_set ， hash_map ， hash_multiset ， hash_multimap 以及与哈希函数相关的所有内容


• rope


• iota


• < a href =http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/lexicographical_compare_3way.html> lexicographical_compare_3way


• random_sample 和 random_sample_n


• MonoidOperation 和 Trivial迭代器概念


• 一系列向后兼容的标头 algo.h

• slist
• bit_vector
• hash_set, hash_map, hash_multiset, hash_multimap and everything pertaining to hash functions
• rope
• iota
• lexicographical_compare_3way
• random_sample and random_sample_n
• the MonoidOperation and Trivial Iterator concepts
• a host of backward compat headers such as algo.h

...我敢打赌，少了更多。

... and I bet you can find a few more.

这篇关于原始STL和最终在C ++标准库中的那些部分之间的具体差异是什么？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！