C ++错误:在'char *'到'char [2]的赋值中不兼容的类型 [英] C++ Error: Incompatible types in assignment of ‘char*’ to ‘char [2]

查看:7843
本文介绍了C ++错误:在'char *'到'char [2]的赋值中不兼容的类型的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有一个问题,我的构造函数。
在我的头文件中我声明:

I have a bit of a problem with my constructor. In my header file I declare:

char short_name_[2]; 




  • 和其他变量

  • 在我的构造函数中:

    Territory(std::string name, char short_name[2], Player* owner, char units);
    void setShortName(char* short_name);
    inline const char (&getShortName() const)[2] { return short_name_; }
    

    在我的cpp文件中:

    Territory::Territory(std::string name, char short_name[2], Player* owner, 
                         char units) : name_(name), short_name_(short_name), 
                        owner_(owner), units_(units)
    { }
    

    我的错误: / p>

    My error:


    Territory.cpp:在构造函数'Territory :: Territory(std :: string,
    char *,Player *,char) ':Territory.cpp:15:33:error:incompatible types
    在'char *'到'char [2]'的赋值

    Territory.cpp: In constructor ‘Territory::Territory(std::string, char*, Player*, char)’: Territory.cpp:15:33: error: incompatible types in assignment of ‘char*’ to ‘char [2]’

    我已经知道 char [2]< => char * 但我不知道如何处理这个关于我的构造函数和get / setters。

    I already figured out that char[2] <=> char* but I'm not sure how to handle this about my constructor and get/setters.

    推荐答案

    p> C ++中的原始数组有点恼人,充满了危险。这是为什么除非你有一个很好的理由,你应该使用 std :: vector std :: array

    Raw arrays in C++ are kind of annoying and fraught with peril. This is why unless you have a very good reason to you should use std::vector or std::array.

    首先,如其他人所说, char [2] 不同于 char * ,或至少不是通常。 char [2] char char * 是指向 char 的指针。他们经常会感到困惑,因为数组会衰减到指向第一个元素的指针,只要他们需要。所以这个工作:

    First off, as others have said, char[2] is not the same as char*, or at least not usually. char[2] is a size 2 array of char and char* is a pointer to a char. They often get confused because arrays will decay to a pointer to the first element whenever they need to. So this works:

    char foo[2];
    char* bar = foo;
    

    但反之则不然:

    const char* bar = "hello";
    const char foo[6] = bar; // ERROR
    

    添加到混淆,当声明函数参数时, char [ ] 等效于 char * 。所以在你的构造函数中,参数 char short_name [2] 真的是 char * short_name

    Adding to the confusion, when declaring function parameters, char[] is equivalent to char*. So in your constructor the parameter char short_name[2] is really char* short_name.

    另一个奇怪的数组是,它们不能像其他类型一样复制(这是为什么函数参数中的数组被视为指针的一个解释)。例如,我可以做这样的事情:

    Another quirk of arrays is that they cannot be copied like other types (this is one explanation for why arrays in function parameters are treated as pointers). So for example I can not do something like this:

    char foo[2] = {'a', 'b'};
    char bar[2] = foo;
    


    $ b c>并将它们复制到 bar 中,或者使用一些函数,例如 std :: copy

    Instead I have to iterate over the elements of foo and copy them into bar, or use some function which does that for me such as std::copy:

    char foo[2] = {'a', 'b'};
    char bar[2];
    // std::begin and std::end are only available in C++11
    std::copy(std::begin(foo), std::end(foo), std::begin(bar));
    

    所以在你的构造函数中,你必须手动复制 short_name into short_name _

    So in your constructor you have to manually copy the elements of short_name into short_name_:

    Territory::Territory(std::string name, char* short_name, Player* owner, 
                         char units) : name_(name), owner_(owner), units_(units)
    { 
        // Note that std::begin and std::end can *not* be used on pointers.
        std::copy(short_name, short_name + 2, std::begin(short_name));
    }
    

    正如你可以看到,这是非常讨厌,所以除非你有一个非常好的原因你只是应该使用 std :: vector 而不是原始数组(或在这种情况下可能 std :: string )。

    As you can see this is all very annoying, so unless you have a very good reason you just should use std::vector instead of raw arrays (or in this case probably std::string).

    这篇关于C ++错误:在'char *'到'char [2]的赋值中不兼容的类型的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆