我需要明确地使用Django Rest Framework序列化程序更新的事务吗？ [英] Do I need to explicitly use transactions with Django Rest Framework serializer updates?
问题描述
根据 http：//www.django -rest-framework.org/api-guide/serializers/#writable-nested-representations ，为了接受嵌套的序列化程序，我需要创建一个更新方法。没有一个示例使用事务，尽管它们修改多个行/表。 DRF是否以某种方式将事物包装在事务中，或者我应该明确地将 transaction.atomic（）全部覆盖？
According to http://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/serializers/#writable-nested-representations, in order to accept a nested serializer I need to create an update method. None of the examples use transactions although they do modify multiple rows/tables. Does the DRF somehow wrap things in transactions already, or should I explicitly put transaction.atomic() all over it?
相关PR：
- https://github.com/tomchristie/django-rest-framework/pull/1787
推荐答案
相关PR与您的问题无关。 PR链接到绕过默认Django事务方案的DRF特定异常处理程序（ https://github.com/tomchristie/django-rest-framework/pull/1204#issuecomment-52712621 ）。
The related PR is unrelated to your question. PR is linked to the DRF specific exception handler that bypassed the default Django transaction scheme (https://github.com/tomchristie/django-rest-framework/pull/1204#issuecomment-52712621).
DRF不特别是将事物包装在一个交易中，让用户随意选择他们想要的任何东西。
DRF doesn't specifically wrap things in a transaction to leave the users free to choose whatever they want to.
这篇关于我需要明确地使用Django Rest Framework序列化程序更新的事务吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
