Aptana Studio与Eclipse [英] Aptana Studio vs. Eclipse

问题描述

我是初学者我正在使用Aptana Studio for PHP。今天我也下载了Eclipse。我注意到大部分的功能和工作是相似的。似乎有一个建立在另一个的代码基础上。

如果是这样，Java上有两个类似的开源IDE需要什么？

解决方案

Aptana是建立在Eclipse上的。

Eclipse是一个通用/而Aptana提供了专门针对Web开发的其他功能。

还有其他Eclipse插件也专注于Web开发，包括Web Tools Project从Eclipse团队。

有些人喜欢Aptana，找到一个方便的相关工具组合。其他人发现Aptana太侵扰了，更喜欢单独选择自己的JavaScript，CSS，XML等插件。

需要两个类似的
Java上的开源IDE。

品种是生活的香料。除了这两个之外，还有很多其他IDE，而且大多数软件和工具/技术也是一样的。

通常，不同的工具不会具有相同的重点，因此为不同的用户提供不同的好处。

这在开放源码世界中尤其如此，用户可以轻松地定制和重新发布产品以按需要的方式工作。

I am a beginner. I am using Aptana Studio for PHP. Today, I also downloaded Eclipse. I notice most of the features and workings are similar. It seems one is built on the code-base of the other.

If so, what was the need for two similar Open Source IDEs on Java?

解决方案

Aptana is built on Eclipse.

Eclipse is a general-purpose/Java-focused editor, whilst Aptana offers additional features which are targeted specifically at web development.

There are also other Eclipse plugins that also focus on web development, including the Web Tools Project from the Eclipse team.

Some people like Aptana, finding it a convenient mix of relevant tools. Others find Aptana too intrusive, and prefer to individually select their own plugins for JavaScript, CSS, XML, and so on.

what was the need for two similar Open Source IDEs on Java.

Variety is the spice of life. There are plenty of other IDEs aside from just these two, and the same situation applies to most software, and tools/technologies in general.

Generally, different tools don't have the same focuses, and therefore provide varying benefits for different users.

This is especially true in the Open Source world, where users can easily customise and re-release products to work in the way they want.

这篇关于Aptana Studio与Eclipse的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！