为了表达平等和不平等,什么被认为是惯用的Fortran? [英] To represent equalities and inequalities, what is considered idiomatic Fortran?
问题描述
使用通常的
a< p> b
x == y
等等或者是
a .lt。 b
x .eq。 y
用得更频繁吗?
有时候我不确定什么是习惯用法,什么是使用Fortran时打卡时代的遗留问题,这可能是我没有找到答案的一种情况
据我所知,选择只是风格,我不认为社区已经同意那个更好。 Fortran 90标准中引入了'现代'运算符(< / code>,
==
...)已经出现了一段时间。
值得注意的是逻辑运算符( .NOT。
, .OR。
...)的格式与传统关系运算符( .NE。
, .LT 。
...)。因此,人们可以选择混搭:
((a <1.0).AND。(a> 0.0 ))
或保持一致:
<$ p
$ ((a .LT。1.0).AND。(a .GT。0.0))
我个人更喜欢现代形式,特别是在这些情况下,因为它有助于区分逻辑运算符和关系运算符。
在我看来,那么 我也很好奇 - 其他人会有不同的偏好吗?也许有人可以参考一个有意见的fortran风格指南。 有趣的是,对我来说一个常见的Fortran引用( PGI Fortran ,第11页)列出了表中的所有现代操作符,使用一个单一遗留操作符的示例,并没有提及任何的其他传统运营商。 Is it more idiomatic to use the usual and so on or is used more frequently? Sometimes I'm not sure what is idiomatic and what is just legacy from the punchcard era when using Fortran, and this is probably the one case I have not found an answer for yet. As far as I know, the choice is stylistic only, and I don't think the community has agreed that one is better. The 'modern' operators ( It's worth noting that logical operators ( or be consistent: I personally prefer the modern form, particularly in these cases, because it helps to distinguish between logical and relational operators. It also seems to me that I'm curious too, though - will other people have different preferences? Perhaps somebody can reference a fortran style guide that has an opinion. Interestingly, a common fortran reference for me (PGI Fortran, page 11) lists all the modern operators in a table, uses an example with a single legacy operator, and doesn't make mention of any of the other legacy operators. 这篇关于为了表达平等和不平等,什么被认为是惯用的Fortran?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!(dif
(dif .LT。tol)
更容易理解,特别是对于休闲或快速阅读。
a < b
x == y
a .lt. b
x .eq. y
<
, ==
...) were introduced in the fortran 90 standard so both have been around for a while..NOT.
, .OR.
...) are formatted similarly to the legacy relational operators (.NE.
, .LT.
...). So one can choose to mix-and-match: ((a < 1.0) .AND. (a > 0.0))
((a .LT. 1.0) .AND. (a .GT. 0.0))
(dif < tol)
is easier to quickly understand than (dif .LT. tol)
, particularly for the casual or fast reader.