意见：网络标准是否重要？ [英] Opinion: Do web standards matter?
问题描述
出于好奇，在查看我正在处理的网站时，我确定
决定将几个网络上最受欢迎的网址扔进W3C
Markup Validator。
来自microsoft.com，google.com，amazon.com，yahoo.com，aol.com和
mozilla。组织，只有Mozilla的网站回来了有效的HTML。
所以，如果所有这些地方，他们的网络开发团队似乎都不会
关心，如果我们其余的小时间网络开发人员关注
标准？我这样做，但有时我觉得这是一种浪费的努力。 yinz
怎么想？
P.S. Slashdot向验证者返回了403 Forbidden，但当我在本地保存
时，它也失败了。
-
[Sugapablo]
[ http://www.sugapablo.net < - - 个人| http://www.sugapablo.com < - music]
[ http://www.2ra.org < - political | http://www.subuse.net < - discuss]
http://www.subuse.net ：纯文本，低带宽，匿名网络论坛
Just out of curiosity, while checking on a site I was working on, I
decided to throw a couple of the web''s most popular URLs into the W3C
Markup Validator.
Out of microsoft.com, google.com, amazon.com, yahoo.com, aol.com, and
mozilla.org, only Mozilla''s site came back "Valid HTML".
So if all these places, with their teams of web developers don''t seem to
care, should the rest of us small time web devs concern ourselves with
standards? I do, but sometimes I feel it''s a wasted effort. What do yinz
think?
P.S. Slashdot returned a 403 Forbidden to the validator but when I saved
the homepage locally, it failed too.
--
[ Sugapablo ]
[ http://www.sugapablo.net <--personal | http://www.sugapablo.com <--music ]
[ http://www.2ra.org <--political | http://www.subuse.net <--discuss ]
http://www.subuse.net : text-only, low bandwidth, anonymous web forums
推荐答案
2005年3月26日星期六08:01:30 -0500，Sugapablo写道：
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:01:30 -0500, Sugapablo wrote:
出于好奇，在查看我正在处理的网站时，我决定将几个网络上最受欢迎的网址扔进W3C
标记验证器。
出自microsoft.com，google.com，amazon.com，yahoo.com，aol.com和
mozilla.org，只有Mozilla的网站回来了Valid HTML。
因此，如果所有这些地方，以及他们的网络开发人员团队似乎都不关心，那么我们其余的网络开发人员是否会关注自己的标准？我这样做，但有时我觉得这是一种浪费的努力。 yinz
想到什么？
P.S。 Slashdot向验证者返回了403 Forbidden，但当我在本地保存主页时，它也失败了。
Just out of curiosity, while checking on a site I was working on, I
decided to throw a couple of the web''s most popular URLs into the W3C
Markup Validator.
Out of microsoft.com, google.com, amazon.com, yahoo.com, aol.com, and
mozilla.org, only Mozilla''s site came back "Valid HTML".
So if all these places, with their teams of web developers don''t seem to
care, should the rest of us small time web devs concern ourselves with
standards? I do, but sometimes I feel it''s a wasted effort. What do yinz
think?
P.S. Slashdot returned a 403 Forbidden to the validator but when I saved
the homepage locally, it failed too.
我遵循标准。不能保证页面在任何地方都能正常工作，但是我觉得它会。也许最终，浏览器
也会赶上并遵循标准。与此同时，一些
制造商喜欢制定自己的标准，而不是遵循已经存在的那些
。
我也尝试生成最小膨胀的页面。保持页面小，所以
他们加载速度很快。这也使他们以后更容易编辑。
Carolyn
I follow the standards. It isn''t a guarantee that the page(s) will work
everywhere, but I like to think it will. Maybe eventually, the browsers
will catch up and follow the standards too. In the mean time, some
manufacturers like to make their own standards, rather than following
those already in existance.
I also try to produce pages with minimal bloat. Keep the pages small, so
they load fast. It also makes them easier to edit later on.
Carolyn
2005年3月26日星期六08:08:11 - 0500，Carolyn Marenger写道：
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:08:11 -0500, Carolyn Marenger wrote:
我也尝试制作最小膨胀的页面。保持页面小，所以它们加载速度快。这也使得以后更容易编辑。
I also try to produce pages with minimal bloat. Keep the pages small, so
they load fast. It also makes them easier to edit later on.
是的，这就是为什么我创建 http://www.subuse.net
2400波特调制解调器，telix，lynx，只有命令行。傻，但是...
另外，今天，有这么多网络电话和移动设备，没有多少网站可以很好地与他们，所以我认为需要极简主义
再次。
-
[Sugapablo]
[ http://www.sugapablo.net < - personal | http://www.sugapablo.com < - music]
[ http://www.2ra.org < - political | http://www.subuse.net < - discuss]
http://www.subuse.net ：纯文本，低带宽，匿名网络论坛
Yeah, that''s why I created http://www.subuse.net
Sometimes, I still get this romantic nostalgia for the days when I had a
2400 baud modem, telix, lynx, and nothing but command line. Silly, but...
Plus, today, with so many web phones and mobile devices, there aren''t many
sites that work well with them, so I figured there''s a need for minimalism
again.
--
[ Sugapablo ]
[ http://www.sugapablo.net <--personal | http://www.sugapablo.com <--music ]
[ http://www.2ra.org <--political | http://www.subuse.net <--discuss ]
http://www.subuse.net : text-only, low bandwidth, anonymous web forums
Sugapablo写道：
Sugapablo wrote:
出于好奇，在查看我正在处理的网站时，我<决定将几个网络上最受欢迎的网址扔进W3C
标记验证器。
好主意;好主动。
从microsoft.com，google.com，amazon.com，yahoo.com，aol.com和
mozilla.org，只有Mozilla的网站回来了有效的HTML。
这是个可悲的消息。这反映了对标准的忽视，而且 - 这些公司雇用的Web开发人员经验不足。
Web标准的运动，就像开源，推广无歧视的网站b $ b。这对每个人都有好处。亚马逊，
Yahoo和M¥¢ro
Just out of curiosity, while checking on a site I was working on, I
decided to throw a couple of the web''s most popular URLs into the W3C
Markup Validator.
Good idea; good initiative.
Out of microsoft.com, google.com, amazon.com, yahoo.com, aol.com, and
mozilla.org, only Mozilla''s site came back "Valid HTML".
That is sad news. This reflects on disregard for standards and moreover --
the inexperience of Web developers that these companies hire.
The movement of Web standards, much like that of Open Source, promotes a Web
that does not discriminate. This benefits everybody. So surely, Amazon,
Yahoo and M￥￠ro
这篇关于意见：网络标准是否重要？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
