敏捷问题和功能跟踪器软件 [英] Agile issue and feature tracker software

查看:102
本文介绍了敏捷问题和功能跟踪器软件的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我正在寻找最佳的敏捷友好功能和缺陷跟踪软件。目前,我们正在使用fogbugz,但就我所知,这对于遵循敏捷方法的团队而言并不是很有用。有更好的工具,例如JIRA的Greenhopper。我以前使用过JIRA,但我想知道是否还有其他更好的工具。

I'm looking for the "best" agile-friendly feature and defect tracking software. Currently, we are using fogbugz, but this is not terribly useful for teams following an agile methodology as far as I can tell. There are better tools for this, such as Greenhopper for JIRA. I've used JIRA before, but I'm wondering if there are any other tools that are better.

推荐答案

我会联系我的经验,希望对您有所帮助。

I'll relate my experience, hoping it will be helpful.

我们开始在墙上使用卡片来试用Scrum。我们认为一旦开始真正使用它,我们将切换到一种工具。我们使用用户案例和任务设置了缺陷跟踪程序( Redmine ),并有一种方法可以在每个项目。但是,我们发现您并没有真正获得物理信息辐射器的透明性。人们走过卡墙,可以看到团队的进展。很少有人会像检查卡片墙那样经常检查该网站。因此,目前,我们为当前Sprint 制作卡壁,并在Redmine中跟踪Sprint,从而向我们提供了历史信息。

We started piloting Scrum using cards on a wall. We figured we would switch to a tool once we started doing it for real. We set up our defect tracker (Redmine) with User Story and Tasks, and have a way to create a burndown in each project. What we found, however, is that you don't really get the transparency of a physical information radiator. People walk by the card wall and can see the team progress. Very few will check the web site as often as they inspect the card wall. So currently, we do the card wall for the current Sprint and track the Sprint in Redmine, which gives us historical information.

最多的团队超出了我们的壁垒空间,我们意识到我们将需要一个可以像纸牌墙一样工作并成为真正的敏捷跟踪器的工具。因此,我们研究了几种工具,我们的简短列表包括版本1 集会混合。这两种产品都可能最适合您,但最终出于各种原因,我们选择了Mingle。

As we scaled up to more teams than we have wall space for, we realized we're going to need a tool that can work like a card wall and be a 'real' agile tracker. So we looked at several tools, and our short list included Version One, Rally, and Mingle. Either of these products might be best for you, but ultimately we chose Mingle for various reasons.

我担心的一件事是卡壁的丢失。很难解释这些公共信息辐射者所具有的变革价值。这些团队从产品负责人,管理层和其他利益相关者那里获得了很多可见性。我担心如果切换到仅使用该工具,可见性将会丢失。我可能需要构建仪表板,该仪表板可以安装在壁挂式显示器上,作为卡片墙的高科技版本。我们要做的一件事是获得一些触摸屏白板,以允许站立的团队使用该工具的拖放式卡墙界面以熟悉的方式移动虚拟卡。我希望这将使我们能够保留在卡片墙上聚集时看到的团队沟通和互动优势。

The one thing I worry about is the loss of the card walls. It's hard to explain the transformative value that these public information radiators have had. The teams get lots of visibility from the Product Owners as well as management and other stakeholders. I worry that the visibility will be lost if we switch to using solely the tool. I may have to build dashboards that go up on wall-mounted monitors, acting as a high-tech version of the card walls. One thing we did do was procure some touchscreen whiteboards that will allow teams in standups to move virtual cards in a familiar way, using the tool's drag-and-drop card wall interface. I'm hoping this will allow us to retain the team communication and interaction benefits we've seen when gathered around a card wall.

无论如何,祝您旅途顺利!

Anyway, good luck with your quest!

这篇关于敏捷问题和功能跟踪器软件的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆