Windows CE或Windows Embedded Standard? [英] Windows CE or Windows Embedded Standard?

查看:232
本文介绍了Windows CE或Windows Embedded Standard?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

利用触摸屏和内容构建一个交互式便携式广告活动设备(x86平台)。这是更好的操作系统的设备,Win CE或Win嵌入式标准(XPE)。我需要为Flash等多媒体平台提供支持,方便广告开发。



谢谢。

解决方案

Windows CE是



(+)便宜很多。几个$。如果你正在计划100台设备,这是一个很大的因素。



( - )并不是那么容易开发,而是Windows API& .NET主要是​​相同的。



(+)被认为不太容易受到病毒/黑客的攻击。<​​/ p>

( - )缺少花哨的东西(如WPF,Silverlight,好的网络服务器/ webbrowser)。



(+)打火机



XP嵌入式和Windows CE都可以使用允许您从med操作系统添加/删除组件的工具来构建,可以根据您的要求进行修改。大多数开发人员可能从来没有这样做,而是使用硬件提供的工厂默认值,或让硬件人为您制作自定义图像。



如果您只做几个设备,XP嵌入是正确的选择。


im building an interactive portable ad campaign device (x86 platform) with touchscreen and stuffs. which is better OS for the device, Win CE or Win embedded standard (XPE). i need to provide support for multimedia platform such as Flash for easy ad development.

thanks.

解决方案

Windows CE is

(+) Much cheaper. A few $. If you are planing 100s of devices this is a big factor.

(-) Not as easy to develop against, but the Windows API & .NET are mostly the same.

(+) Considered less vulnerable to viruses / hackers.

(-) Lacking fancy stuff (like WPF, silverlight, good webserver/webbrowser).

(+) Lighter, runs on less memory and slower CPU.

Both XP embedded and Windows CE can be built using tools that allow you to add/remove components from med OS making it possible to trim it to your requirements. Most developer probably never does this but rather use what is "factory default" delivered with the hardware, or let the hardware guys make a custom made image for you.

If you are only doing a few devices, XP embedded is the right choice.

这篇关于Windows CE或Windows Embedded Standard?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆