javascript - underscore的reduce和reduceRight为什么不使用native function ?

问题描述

问 题

在读underscore的源码，有一个疑问，为什么不优先选择原生的reduce和reduceRight

源码中，比如 _.keys，都是先探测是否支持Object.keys的。

 // Create a reducing function iterating left or right.
  // ? why dont use native reduce
  var createReduce = function(dir) {
    // Wrap code that reassigns argument variables in a separate function than
    // the one that accesses `arguments.length` to avoid a perf hit. (#1991)
    var reducer = function(obj, iteratee, memo, initial) {
      var keys = !isArrayLike(obj) && _.keys(obj),
          length = (keys || obj).length,
          index = dir > 0 ? 0 : length - 1;
      if (!initial) {
        memo = obj[keys ? keys[index] : index];
        index += dir;
      }
      for (; index >= 0 && index < length; index += dir) {
        var currentKey = keys ? keys[index] : index;
        memo = iteratee(memo, obj[currentKey], currentKey, obj);
      }
      return memo;
    };

    return function(obj, iteratee, memo, context) {
      var initial = arguments.length >= 3;
      return reducer(obj, optimizeCb(iteratee, context, 4), memo, initial);
    };
  };
// **Reduce** builds up a single result from a list of values, aka `inject`,
// or `foldl`.
_.reduce = _.foldl = _.inject = createReduce(1);

// The right-associative version of reduce, also known as `foldr`.
_.reduceRight = _.foldr = createReduce(-1);

解决方案

原生的 reduce 只用于数组，underscore 的 reduce 能用于 Object

顺带安利我的 Repo -> https://github.com/hanzichi/underscore-analysis

这篇关于javascript - underscore的reduce和reduceRight为什么不使用native function ?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！