使用相同的var关键字初始化多个javascript变量有什么好处? [英] What is the advantage of initializing multiple javascript variables with the same var keyword?
问题描述
当我阅读那些显然非常擅长的javascript代码时,我常常看到这种模式
When I read javascript code that is clean and written by people who are obviously very good at it, I often see this pattern
var x = some.initialization.method(),
y = something.els(),
z;
写作的优势是什么
var x = some.initialization.method();
var y = something.els();
var z;
第二种格式更容易维护,因为每条线本身都存在。因此,您可以擦除一行或添加一行,而不必四处查看它是否是要初始化的第一个或最后一个变量。这也意味着源控制差异/合并将更好地工作。鉴于这些缺点,我猜测第一种格式有一些优势 - 但它是什么?当然它们执行相同,因为它与解析器相同。
The second format is easier to maintain, since each line exists by itself. So you can erase a line or add a line, and not have to look around to see if it's the first or last variable to be initialized. This also means source control diffs/merges will work better. Given these disadvantages, I'm guessing there's some advantage to the first format -- but what is it? Surely they execute identically because it's the same to the parser.
推荐答案
发送的javascript大小略有优势到浏览器; Google的 Closure编译器在仅限空白模式下将单个var版本编译为:
There's a slight advantage with the size of the javascript that is sent to the browser; Google's Closure compiler in 'whitespace only' mode will compile the single var version into:
var x=some.initialization.method(),y=something.els(),z;
和multi as:
var x=some.initialization.method();var y=something.els();var z;
我将 else
更改为 els
以便它可以编译。
I changed your else
to els
so that it would compile.
这不是一个巨大的收获(特别是如果你也压缩文件),无论如何,'简单'编译模式会为你做这件事,所以我可能不会太在意它,除非你能找到更有说服力的理由。
This isn't a massive gain (especially if you are also compressing the files), and the 'simple' compilation mode will do this for you anyway, so I probably wouldn't be too concerned about it unless you can find more compelling reasons.
一个原因你可能不想要这样做,如果你不小心使用分号而不是逗号你刚刚发现了全局。
One reason you may not want to do this is that if you accidentally use a semicolon instead of a comma you've just found a global.
这篇关于使用相同的var关键字初始化多个javascript变量有什么好处?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!