书呆子 [英] Pedants
问题描述
亲爱的迂腐用户
什么是学究？
根据dictionary.com，你是：
1.过度或不恰当地展示学习的人。
2.过分强调规则或细节的人。
3.一个人谁坚持不懈地坚持书本知识而不考虑
常识。
我很高兴这个标志，为像你这样的人完成
按预期工作。
我的编译器系统不适合学生，所以你可以停止使用它b / b $ b并获得一个适合你迂腐需求的编译器。许多学生
这里（这个小组有很多）会指向你最喜欢的软件。
-
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels / informatique
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32
Dear pedantic user
What is a pedant?
According to dictionary.com you are:
1. a person who makes an excessive or inappropriate display of learning.
2. a person who overemphasizes rules or minor details.
3. a person who adheres rigidly to book knowledge without regard to
common sense.
I am very glad that this flag, done for people like you
works as expected.
My compiler system is not for pedants, so you can stop using it
and get a compiler that suits your pedantic needs. Many pedants
here (this group has a lot of them) will point you to their
favorite software.
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32
推荐答案
jacob navia写道：
jacob navia wrote:
亲爱的迂腐用户
什么是一个学究？
根据dictionary.com，你是：
1.过度或不恰当地展示学习的人。
2.过分强调规则或细节的人。
3.严格遵守书本知识而不考虑常识的人b / b
常识。
我很高兴这个标志，为你这样的人完成
按预期工作。
我编译r系统不适合学生使用，所以你可以停止使用它来获得一个适合你迂腐需求的编译器。许多学生
这里（这个小组有很多）将指向你最喜欢的软件
。
Dear pedantic user
What is a pedant?
According to dictionary.com you are:
1. a person who makes an excessive or inappropriate display of learning.
2. a person who overemphasizes rules or minor details.
3. a person who adheres rigidly to book knowledge without regard to
common sense.
I am very glad that this flag, done for people like you
works as expected.
My compiler system is not for pedants, so you can stop using it
and get a compiler that suits your pedantic needs. Many pedants
here (this group has a lot of them) will point you to their
favorite software.
此消息应该已发送到
迂腐是一个坏旗
线程......
但无论如何，忘记它，这是不值得的努力
-
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr b / b
logiciels / informatique
http ：//www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32
6月21日下午1:19，jacob navia< ja .. 。@ nospam.comwrote：
On Jun 21, 1:19 pm, jacob navia <ja...@nospam.comwrote:
jacob navia写道：
jacob navia wrote:
亲爱的迂腐用户
Dear pedantic user
什么是学究？
What is a pedant?
根据dictionary.com，您是：
According to dictionary.com you are:
1。过度或不恰当地展示学习的人。
2.过分强调规则或细节的人。
3.严格遵守书本知识的人关于
常识。
1. a person who makes an excessive or inappropriate display of learning.
2. a person who overemphasizes rules or minor details.
3. a person who adheres rigidly to book knowledge without regard to
common sense.
我很高兴这个标志，为你这样的人完成
按预期工作。
I am very glad that this flag, done for people like you
works as expected.
我的编译器系统不适合学生使用，所以你可以停止使用
并获得一个适合你迂腐的编译器需要。许多学生
这里（这个群体有很多）会指向你最喜欢的b / b
软件。
My compiler system is not for pedants, so you can stop using it
and get a compiler that suits your pedantic needs. Many pedants
here (this group has a lot of them) will point you to their
favorite software.
此消息应该已发送到
迂腐是一个坏旗
线程。 ..
但无论如何，忘记它，不值得努力
This message should have been sent to the
"Is pedantic a bad flag"
thread...
But anyway, forget it, it is not worth the effort
我认为制作线程的人是故意制作线程
关于在编译器系统中不重要的错误。
但忽略诱饵并修复错误会更明智。
I think the person who made the thread is on purpose making threads
about bugs with little importance in your compiler system.
But it would be wiser to ignore the bait and just fix the bugs.
jacob navia skrev：
jacob navia skrev:
我的编译器系统不适合学生使用，所以你可以停止使用它
并获得适合您迂腐需求的编译器。许多学生
这里（这个群体有很多）会指向你最喜欢的b / b
软件。
My compiler system is not for pedants, so you can stop using it
and get a compiler that suits your pedantic needs. Many pedants
here (this group has a lot of them) will point you to their
favorite software.
我觉得奇怪的是C编译器的维护者，更关心他的HTML，而不是他的C代码。
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~ lcc-win32 / 验证HTML 4.01严格！：
祝贺
该文件位于< http：// www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32/
已检查并发现有效的HTML 4.01严格。这意味着所讨论的
资源将其自身标识为HTML 4.01 Strict。并且我们使用SGML或XML解析器成功执行了正式验证
（取决于所使用的标记语言）。
有效 ;您网页上的图标
为了向您的读者展示您已经注意创建一个
可互操作的网页，您可以显示此图标在任何页面上
验证。以下是您可以使用的HTML将此图标添加到您的网页
页面：
-
Tor< bw **** @ wvtqvm.vw | tr i-za-h a-z>
I find it odd that a C compiler maintainer, care more for his HTML, than
his C code.
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32/ validate to HTML 4.01 Strict!:
Congratulations
The document located at <http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32/ was
checked and found to be valid HTML 4.01 Strict. This means that the
resource in question identified itself as "HTML 4.01 Strict" and that we
successfully performed a formal validation using an SGML or XML Parser
(depending on the markup language used).
"valid" Icon(s) on your Web page
To show your readers that you have taken the care to create an
interoperable Web page, you may display this icon on any page that
validates. Here is the HTML you could use to add this icon to your Web
page:
--
Tor <bw****@wvtqvm.vw | tr i-za-h a-z>
这篇关于书呆子的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
