我受够了 [英] I've Had Enough

问题描述

我已经受够了C＃。我已经为每个

''if''语句使用了括号。我已经有足够的时间将方法的返回值与流量控制混合在一起，使编写的代码既可读又一致，不可能。


C＃受其前辈和微软营销部门的阻碍。如果安德斯有他的方式，这种语言将是一个

可读代码不是非常不可能的非平凡代码;但不，

微软营销和C ++ / Java阻碍了他们。证据很明显是用语言显而易见的。


微软，技术领先的公司，已经敲响了

。影响我们所有人的影响。

I''ve had enough of C#. I''ve had enough of using parentheses for every
''if'' statement. I''ve had enough of having to mix assignment of return
value of methods with flow control, making writing code that''s both
readable and consistent, impossible.

C# is hindered by its predecessors and the Microsoft marketing
department. If Anders had his way, this language would be a one where
readable code isn''t a near impossibility for non-trivial code; but no,
Microsoft marketing and C++/Java got in his way. The evidence is
blatently apparent in the language.

Microsoft, the company where money comes before technology, has struck
again. The repercussions affect us all.

推荐答案

Daniel Pratt写道：

Daniel Pratt wrote:

嗨C＃Learner，

Hi C# Learner,

我已经有足够的C＃了。我已经为每个
''if''语句使用了括号。我已经有足够的时间将方法的返回值与流量控制相结合，使编写的代码既可读又一致，不可能。

C＃受其前辈和微软营销部门的阻碍。如果安德斯有他的方式，这种语言将是一个可读代码不是几乎不可能的非平凡代码;但是没有，
微软营销和C ++ / Java阻碍了他们。证据在语言中显得非常明显。

微软，即技术之前的资金来源的公司，再次遭遇打击。这些影响影响了我们所有人。
我遇到的语言都不算完美。

I''ve had enough of C#. I''ve had enough of using parentheses for every
''if'' statement. I''ve had enough of having to mix assignment of return
value of methods with flow control, making writing code that''s both
readable and consistent, impossible.

C# is hindered by its predecessors and the Microsoft marketing
department. If Anders had his way, this language would be a one where
readable code isn''t a near impossibility for non-trivial code; but no,
Microsoft marketing and C++/Java got in his way. The evidence is
blatently apparent in the language.

Microsoft, the company where money comes before technology, has struck
again. The repercussions affect us all.
No language that I''ve encountered would I consider perfect.

我感觉一样:-)

甚至没有关闭。我所看到的任何语言都要么妥协，要么实际上没用（或两者兼而有之）。你有没有找到一种你更喜欢的语言，或者你正在考虑另一种职业吗？

I feel the same :-)
Not even
close. Any language that I''ve seen is either filled with compromises or is
practically useless (or both). Have you found a language you like better, or
are you considering another vocation?

多年来我一直是德尔福人。 Delphi'是一种语言，我觉得，b
，这使得编写清晰的代码变得简单，编写难以阅读的代码很难。话虽如此，我觉得Delphi并不完美。


我想给Delphi 8（for .NET）一个旋转。虽然这个（IMO）存在一个问题：它允许全局数据/例程:(


C＃在某些方面是一种很好的语言，但它我太过抑制了

C / C ++ / Java，IMO。


我认为理想的语言将结合C＃和
德尔福。


我可能会在未来的某个时候设计这样一种语言，主要是为了给孩子们带来乐趣，甚至可能是它的MSIL编译器。在更大规模的事情中，它可能会浪费大量的时间。

I''ve been a Delphi person for some years. Delphi''s a language that, I
feel, makes writing clear code easy, and writing hard-to-read code
difficult. With that said, I don''t feel Delphi is perfect.

I''m thinking of giving Delphi 8 (for .NET) a spin. Though there is a
problem with that (IMO): it allows global data/routines :(

C# is a nice language in some ways, but it''s too inhibited by
C/C++/Java, IMO.

I think that the ideal language would combine the best parts of C# and
Delphi.

I may, at some point in the future, design such a language mainly for
fun, and perhaps even make an MSIL compiler for it. It''d probably be a
massive waste of time though, in the larger scale of things.

你好C＃Learner，


" C＃Learner" cs **** @ learner.here>在留言中写道

news：％2 *** ************* @ TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl ...

Hi C# Learner,

"C# Learner" <cs****@learner.here> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...

我已经受够了C＃。我已经有足够的使用括号了
''if''声明。我已经有足够的时间将方法的返回值与流量控制混合，m编写代码既可读又一致，不可能。

C＃受其前辈和微软营销部门的阻碍。如果安德斯有他的方式，这种语言将是一个可读代码不是几乎不可能的非平凡代码;但是没有，
微软营销和C ++ / Java阻碍了他们。证据在语言中显得非常明显。

微软，即技术之前的资金来源的公司，再次遭遇打击。这些影响影响了我们所有人。

I''ve had enough of C#. I''ve had enough of using parentheses for every
''if'' statement. I''ve had enough of having to mix assignment of return
value of methods with flow control, making writing code that''s both
readable and consistent, impossible.

C# is hindered by its predecessors and the Microsoft marketing
department. If Anders had his way, this language would be a one where
readable code isn''t a near impossibility for non-trivial code; but no,
Microsoft marketing and C++/Java got in his way. The evidence is
blatently apparent in the language.

Microsoft, the company where money comes before technology, has struck
again. The repercussions affect us all.

没有我遇到的语言我认为是完美的。甚至没有

关闭。我见过的任何一种语言都是妥协的，或者是b $ b几乎没用（或两者兼而有之）。您是否找到了自己喜欢的语言，或者

您在考虑另一种职业吗？


问候，

Daniel

" C＃Learner" < CS **** @ learner.here>在消息中写道

新闻：％2 ****************** @ TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl ...

"C# Learner" <cs****@learner.here> wrote in message
news:%2******************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

Daniel Pratt写道：

Daniel Pratt wrote:

你好C＃Learner，

Hi C# Learner,

我已经受够了C＃。我已经为每个
''if''语句使用了括号。我已经有足够的时间将方法的返回值与流量控制相结合，使编写的代码既可读又一致，不可能。

C＃受其前辈和微软营销部门的阻碍。如果安德斯有他的方式，这种语言将是一个可读代码不是几乎不可能的非平凡代码;但是没有，
微软营销和C ++ / Java阻碍了他们。证据在语言中显得非常明显。

微软，即技术之前的资金来源的公司，再次遭遇打击。这些影响影响了我们所有人。

I''ve had enough of C#. I''ve had enough of using parentheses for every
''if'' statement. I''ve had enough of having to mix assignment of return
value of methods with flow control, making writing code that''s both
readable and consistent, impossible.

C# is hindered by its predecessors and the Microsoft marketing
department. If Anders had his way, this language would be a one where
readable code isn''t a near impossibility for non-trivial code; but no,
Microsoft marketing and C++/Java got in his way. The evidence is
blatently apparent in the language.

Microsoft, the company where money comes before technology, has struck
again. The repercussions affect us all.

我没有遇到任何语言我认为是完美的。

No language that I''ve encountered would I consider perfect.

我感觉一样:-)

I feel the same :-)

甚至没有关闭。我见过的任何一种语言都要么妥协，要么
几乎没用（或两者兼而有之）。您是否找到了您喜欢的语言
更好，或者您正在考虑另一种职业？

Not even
close. Any language that I''ve seen is either filled with compromises or is practically useless (or both). Have you found a language you like better, or are you considering another vocation?

我多年来一直是德尔福人。 Delphi是一种语言，我感觉这样做，使得编写清晰的代码变得容易，并且难以编写难以阅读的代码。话虽如此，我觉得Delphi并不完美。

我正在考虑给Delphi 8（for .NET）一个旋转。虽然有一个（IMO）的问题：它允许全局数据/例程:(

C＃在某些方面是一种很好的语言，但是它被'br抑制了/> C / C ++ / Java，IMO。

我认为理想的语言将结合C＃和Delphi的最佳部分。

我可能，在在未来的某些方面，设计这样一种语言主要是为了有趣，甚至可能为它制作一个MSIL编译器。它可能会大量浪费时间，但在更大规模的事情。

I''ve been a Delphi person for some years. Delphi''s a language that, I
feel, makes writing clear code easy, and writing hard-to-read code
difficult. With that said, I don''t feel Delphi is perfect.

I''m thinking of giving Delphi 8 (for .NET) a spin. Though there is a
problem with that (IMO): it allows global data/routines :(

C# is a nice language in some ways, but it''s too inhibited by
C/C++/Java, IMO.

I think that the ideal language would combine the best parts of C# and
Delphi.

I may, at some point in the future, design such a language mainly for
fun, and perhaps even make an MSIL compiler for it. It''d probably be a
massive waste of time though, in the larger scale of things.

不同人的不同笔画。虽然你发现Delphi可读

和C风格（基于C语法 - 即，C，C ++，Java，C＃）代码难以理解，我发现Delphi代码不可读。除了找到一个

语言之外，你无能为力舒服并坚持下去。

"Different strokes for different folks". While you find Delphi readable
and C style (based on C syntax - i.e., C, C++, Java, C#) code unreadable, I
find Delphi code unreadable. There isn''t much you can do except find a
language that you are comfortable with and stick to it.

这篇关于我受够了的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！