是时候摆脱未签名？ [英] time to get rid of unsigned?
问题描述
我知道无符号整数数据类型是造成大多数b / b
虚假警告信息的原因，但我并没有意识到它们是一个安全
风险（参见此处
http：// www .securitytracker.com /警报... / 1009067.html）。全部为一个
可能会多加一点。
那么C ++是否有时间弃用无符号整数类型？
john
I knew that unsigned integral data types were the cause of scads of mostly
spurious warning messages, but I didn''t realise that they were a security
risk too (see here
http://www.securitytracker.com/alert.../1009067.html). All for one
measly extra bit.
So has the time come for C++ to deprecate unsigned integral types?
john
推荐答案
" John Harrison" <乔************* @ hotmail.com>在消息新闻中写道：c0 ************* @ ID-196037.news.uni-berlin.de ...
"John Harrison" <jo*************@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c0*************@ID-196037.news.uni-berlin.de...
我知道无符号整数数据类型是scads的原因主要是虚假的警告信息，但我并没有意识到它们也是一种安全风险（见这里
http://www.securitytracker.com/alert.../1009067.html) 。所有这一切都非常有用。
那么C ++是否还有时间来弃用无符号整数类型？
I knew that unsigned integral data types were the cause of scads of mostly
spurious warning messages, but I didn''t realise that they were a security
risk too (see here
http://www.securitytracker.com/alert.../1009067.html). All for one
measly extra bit.
So has the time come for C++ to deprecate unsigned integral types?
实际上它看起来只是相反的问题。如果计算是
全部未签名，则不会有问题。
Actually it looks like just the opposite problem. If the calculation was
all unsigned, it wouldn''t be a problem.
" John Harrison" <乔************* @ hotmail.com>写了
"John Harrison" <jo*************@hotmail.com> wrote
我知道无符号整数数据类型是大多数虚假警告信息的原因，但我并没有意识到它们也是一种安全风险（请参阅此处
http：//www.securitytracker .COM /警报... / 1009067.html）。所有这一切都非常有用。
那么C ++是否还有时间来弃用无符号整数类型？
I knew that unsigned integral data types were the cause of scads of mostly
spurious warning messages, but I didn''t realise that they were a security
risk too (see here
http://www.securitytracker.com/alert.../1009067.html). All for one
measly extra bit.
So has the time come for C++ to deprecate unsigned integral types?
你不要不要弃用功能，因为有些人太不能使用它们
正确。如果你这样做了，你也会删除指针，引用，副作用和
别名等等，最后会得到一种完全不同的语言，这可能会让你看起来像b $ b。很像ML。 C ++是一种电动工具，需要与
适当的谨慎和培训一起使用。任何编程错误都是
程序员的错，而不是语言。
Claudio Puviani
You don''t deprecate features because some people are too incompetent to use them
correctly. If you did, you''d also remove pointers, references, side-effects and
aliasing, etc. and end up with a completely different language that would
probably look a lot like ML. C++ is a power tool and needs to be used with the
appropriate caution and training. Any programming error is the fault of the
programmer, not the language.
Claudio Puviani
" Ron Natalie" < ro*@sensor.com>在消息中写道
news：40 ********************* @ news.newshosting.com。 ..
"Ron Natalie" <ro*@sensor.com> wrote in message
news:40*********************@news.newshosting.com. ..
John Harrison <乔************* @ hotmail.com>在消息中写道
"John Harrison" <jo*************@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news：c0 ************* @ ID-196037.news.uni-berlin.de ...
news:c0*************@ID-196037.news.uni-berlin.de...
我知道无符号整数数据类型是导致
大部分虚假警告消息的原因，但我没有意识到它们是
安全性也是风险（见这里
http：// www.securitytracker.com/alert.../1009067.html）。所有这些都是
一个可怜的额外位。
那么C ++是否还有时间来弃用无符号整数类型？
I knew that unsigned integral data types were the cause of scads of mostly spurious warning messages, but I didn''t realise that they were a security risk too (see here
http://www.securitytracker.com/alert.../1009067.html). All for one measly extra bit.
So has the time come for C++ to deprecate unsigned integral types?
实际上它看起来就像是相反的问题。如果计算结果全部未签名，则不会有问题。
Actually it looks like just the opposite problem. If the calculation was
all unsigned, it wouldn''t be a problem.
如果全部是int，那么它也不是问题，问题是
两者的混合以及可能导致的溢出。由于我不认为有人建议删除已签名的整数，所以我建议我们放弃
无符号。除了字符类型外。
john
If it was all int it wouldn''t be an issue either, the problem is the mix of
the two and the overflows that can result. Since I don''t guess anyone is
proposing to remove signed integers, I''m proposing that we should drop
unsigned. Except maybe for character types.
john
这篇关于是时候摆脱未签名？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
