用于审核的新FAQ版本 [英] New FAQ Version for review
问题描述
常见问题解答的更新版本如下：
< URL：http：//jibbering.com/faq/newfaq/>
迄今为止的更改/修改是：
2.3更正后的跨度至垃圾邮件。
2.3更新了关于未发布受版权保护资料的说明。
2.3删除了关于Google网上论坛的段落。
2.3 Para 5添加了关于可传输的代码的说明。
2.4制作答案的LI列表。
2.7更新了对JScript的MS组的引用。
3.1更新以包含第五版。
3.2（WSH）添加到.wsh新闻组参考。
3.2添加了MS调试器和文档的链接。
3.2更新以引用microsoft.public.scripting.wsh而不是
Google Groups
4.4更新了Cookie上的新链接。 />
4.6更新以引用4.7措辞有问题？
4.9重新命名如何找到浏览器画布区域的大小？
4.13稍微重写。
4.20更新以引用setTimeout和setInterval中的延迟
4.43更新以反映JS控制台的新位置i n Opera
5.1更新以请求FAQ条目的提案草案。
我可能会在进行此操作时未能注意到一些更改。我还有24个以上的FAQENTRY请求需要排序，然后是因为Bart每天发布一个部分而在常见问题解答中讨论
。
我认为3.2足够长，可能会因为被移动到它自己的页面而受益。
欢迎提出想法和意见。
-
兰迪
机会有利于准备好的心灵
comp.lang.javascript常见问题 - http://jibbering.com/faq
Javascript最佳实践 - http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/
There is an updated version of the FAQ at:
<URL: http://jibbering.com/faq/newfaq/>
The changes/modifications to date are:
2.3 Corrected "span" to "spam".
2.3 Updated with a note about not posting copyrighted material.
2.3 Removed paragraph about Google Groups.
2.3 Para 5 Added note about code being executable as transmitted.
2.4 Made an LI list of the answers.
2.7 Updated with a reference to the MS group for JScript.
3.1 Updated to include Fifth Edition.
3.2 (WSH) added to the .wsh newsgroup reference.
3.2 Added links to the MS Debugger and Documentation.
3.2 Updated to refer to microsoft.public.scripting.wsh rather than
Google Groups
4.4 Updated with new links on cookies.
4.6 Updated to refer to 4.7 Wording questionable?
4.9 Retitled "How do I find the size of the browser canvas area?"
4.13 Slightly reworded.
4.20 Updated to refer to the delay in setTimeout and setInterval
4.43 Updated to reflect the new location of the JS Console in Opera
5.1 Updated to request draft proposal for an FAQ Entry.
There are probably some changes I failed to notate when doing it. I
still have 24 more FAQENTRY requests to sort through and then the
discussions on the FAQ since Bart has been posting a section a day.
I think that 3.2 is getting sufficiently lengthy enough that it might
benefit from being moved to a page of it''s own.
Thoughts and comments are welcome.
--
Randy
Chance Favors The Prepared Mind
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq
Javascript Best Practices - http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/
推荐答案
Randy Webb写道：
Randy Webb wrote:
有一个更新版本常见问题解答：
< URL：http：//jibbering.com/faq/newfaq/>
Th对日期的更改/修改是：
There is an updated version of the FAQ at:
<URL: http://jibbering.com/faq/newfaq/>
The changes/modifications to date are:
< snip>
<snip>
4.9 Retitled如何找到浏览器画布区域的大小？
4.9 Retitled "How do I find the size of the browser canvas area?"
我认为你没有购买Lee的理由，即实际上经常被问到的问题是关于窗口的问题。大小，即使所需的
信息和给出的答案，实际上与客户有关
区域大小？
I take it you did not buy Lee''s justification that the question that
actually is frequently asked is about "window" size, even if the
information required, and the answers given, actually relate to client
area size?
4.13略有改动。
4.13 Slightly reworded.
< snip>
我从未想过4.13的措辞有什么问题
原样，但是当你列举只是阅读的情况 -
contrl.value - 有问题时，不要< IINPUT type =" file元素
是否合格？
Richard。
<snip>
I never thought that there was anything wrong with the wording of 4.13
as it was, but while you are enumerating situations where just reading -
contrl.value - is problematic don''t <IINPUT type="file"elements
qualify?
Richard.
Richard Cornford在2006年11月26日下午6:51发表以下内容：
Richard Cornford said the following on 11/26/2006 6:51 PM:
Randy Webb写道：
Randy Webb wrote:
>有一个更新版本的常见问题解答：
< URL：http：//jibbering.com/faq/newfaq/>
迄今为止的更改/修改是：
>There is an updated version of the FAQ at:
<URL: http://jibbering.com/faq/newfaq/>
The changes/modifications to date are:
< snip>
<snip>
> 4.9 Retitled如何找到浏览器画布区域的大小？
>4.9 Retitled "How do I find the size of the browser canvas area?"
我认为你没有买李的理由，实际上经常被问到的问题是关于窗口的问题。大小，即使所需的
信息，以及给出的答案，实际上与客户相关
区域大小？
I take it you did not buy Lee''s justification that the question that
actually is frequently asked is about "window" size, even if the
information required, and the answers given, actually relate to client
area size?
我可以买到这个理由，这只是一个误导性的标题。它现在再次重新打印
：
我如何找到窗口/浏览器画布区域的大小？
使用此注释：
虽然经常会询问窗口大小，但更有意义的是
" canvas area"浏览器。
I can buy that justification, it is just a misleading title is all. It
is now reworded again:
"How do I find the size of the window/browser canvas area?"
With this note:
While it is often asked about window size, what is more relevant is the
"canvas area" of the browser.
> 4.13略有改动。
>4.13 Slightly reworded.
< snip>
我从未想过4.13的措辞有什么问题
原样，
<snip>
I never thought that there was anything wrong with the wording of 4.13
as it was,
这样的措辞暗示有一个例外，然后它说
还有另一个例外例外。这对我来说只是误导，如果
它到达现在的方式会产生误导，它可以改回来。
The wording, as it was, implied there was One exception, then it says
there is another exception. It was just misleading to me is all and if
it gets to where the way it is now is misleading, it can be changed back.
但是当你列举只是阅读的情况时 -
contrl.value - 有问题不要< IINPUT类型="文件元素
资格？
but while you are enumerating situations where just reading -
contrl.value - is problematic don''t <IINPUT type="file"elements
qualify?
当然可以，现在有一个小片段。我打算
找到一段< URL：
http://www.jibbering.com/faq/faq_notes/form_access.html处理
文件输入，但它不会出现在该文档的任何位置。
我非常确定第三例例的措辞会留下很多东西
期望并且可以再次更改。
-
兰迪
机会有利于准备好的心灵
comp.lang.javascript常见问题 - http://jibbering.com/faq
Javascript最佳实践 - http：//www.JavascriptToolbox .com / bestpractices /
Randy Webb写道：
Randy Webb wrote:
有一个更新版本常见问题解答：
< URL：http：//jibbering.com/faq/newfaq/>
There is an updated version of the FAQ at:
<URL: http://jibbering.com/faq/newfaq/>
[...]
[...]
欢迎提出想法和意见。
Thoughts and comments are welcome.
你能更新CSS吗？目前的FAQ看起来非常非常过时。
格式的Javascript Best Practices页面相当不错[1]，
也许这个（或者类似的东西）可以在没有太多支付的情况下采用
的努力？
也许Matt会做志愿者，如果没有，我很乐意这样做。
1.文字设置得太小，虚线边框是媚俗的;-),
否则它简单，干净，相当现代。
-
Rob
Can you update the CSS? The current FAQ looks very, very dated. The
format of the "Javascript Best Practices" page is pretty good[1],
perhaps that (or something similar) can be adopted without too much
effort?
Maybe Matt would volunteer, if not, I''m happy to do it.
1. The text is set too small and the dashed borders are kitsch ;-),
otherwise it''s simple, clean and reasonably modern.
--
Rob
这篇关于用于审核的新FAQ版本的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
