IronPython-0.6现已推出！ [英] IronPython-0.6 is now available!
问题描述
IronPython目前处于预备α阶段，适合于实验，但不适用于严肃的开发工作。
http://www.ironpython.com
IronPython is currently at a pre-alpha stage suitable for
experimentation but not for serious development work.
http://www.ironpython.com
推荐答案
Neuruss写道：
Neuruss wrote:
IronPython目前处于适用于实验的前α阶段，但不适用于严肃的开发工作。
http://www.ironpython.com
IronPython is currently at a pre-alpha stage suitable for
experimentation but not for serious development work.
http://www.ironpython.com
这个是个好消息！对于那些需要编译的人来说，这可能是一个答案。
python [*]。也是跨平台的！[**]
[*]是的，有py2exe，而.net意味着IL，但它是.exe！
[**] .net for windows，mono for unix systems :)
顺便说一句。有没有严重的python-lover试过C＃？我持怀疑态度，它从微软那里得到了b $ b，但我现在正在读一本关于它的书（C＃编程），
我得到了给人留下深刻的印象 - 它可能是一种非常高效的语言，而且速度快。
-
Ph''nglui mglw''nath Cthulhu R''lyeh wgah''nagl fhtagn"你不明白吗？
This is great news! It could be an answer to those who need ''compiled''
python[*]. And cross-platform too![**]
[*] Yes, there''s py2exe, and .net means IL, but it''s an .exe!
[**] .net for windows, mono for unix systems :)
Btw. has any serious python-lover tried C#? I was sceptical, it comming
from Microsoft, but I''m reading a book about it now ("Programming C#"),
and I''m getting really impressed - it could be a very productive
language, and speedy also.
--
What part of "Ph''nglui mglw''nath Cthulhu R''lyeh wgah''nagl fhtagn" don''t
you understand?
Ivan Voras写道：
Ivan Voras wrote:
顺便说一句。有没有严重的python-lover试过C＃？我对此持怀疑态度，它来自微软，但我现在正在读一本关于它的书（C＃编程），
我得到了非常深刻的印象 - 它可能是一个非常好的高效的语言，也快速。
Btw. has any serious python-lover tried C#? I was sceptical, it comming
from Microsoft, but I''m reading a book about it now ("Programming C#"),
and I''m getting really impressed - it could be a very productive
language, and speedy also.
你觉得C＃与Java有什么不同？
尽管我可以想象，那些发现Python的人对于许多应用程序而言，与Java和C ++相比具有显着的优势，但很可能对于C＃感受到
的感觉，只有更多所以。难道它基本上不是以高级MS为中心的重制Java，但却缺少最适合Java（和Python）的跨平台性质吗？ />
-Peter
In what way do you feel C# is significantly different than Java?
As near as I can figure, those who find Python has significant
advantages for many applications over Java and C++ will likely
feel the same way about C#, only more so. Isn''t it basically
a highly MS-centric remake of Java, but missing the very
cross-platform nature which has served Java (and Python) best?
-Peter
2004年7月29日星期四01:27:28 +0200，Ivan Voras< ivoras @__ geri.cc .fer.hr>写道：
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:27:28 +0200, Ivan Voras <ivoras@__geri.cc.fer.hr> wrote:
顺便说一下。有没有严重的python-lover试过C＃？我对此持怀疑态度，它来自微软，但我现在正在读一本关于它的书（C＃编程），
我得到了非常深刻的印象 - 它可能是一个非常好的高效的语言，也快速。
Btw. has any serious python-lover tried C#? I was sceptical, it comming
from Microsoft, but I''m reading a book about it now ("Programming C#"),
and I''m getting really impressed - it could be a very productive
language, and speedy also.
这不是完全不可能的。微软实际上涉及语言和虚拟机领域的一些非b
b非微软专家在开发一些.NET技术时设计的b $ b设计，例如作为CLR的
。
我还没有时间详细查看这些东西，
但是我会，并且根本不会让我感到惊讶的是，在很多方面它都是非常好的 - 这不是一件好事吗？MS并不只是伪造所有这些来自
完全孤立，忽略了之前的所有事情，
希望在第3版中让它正常工作。
dt。
This isn''t entirely unlikely. Microsoft actually involved a number of
non-Microsoft experts in the field of language and "virtual machine"
design in the development of some of the .NET technologies, such as
the CLR.
I haven''t yet found the time to look at any of this stuff in detail,
but I will, and it wouldn''t surprise me at all to learn that it was
really quite good in many respects - MS didn''t just forge it all from
the ground up in total isolation, ignoring all that had gone before,
hoping to get it working right in the 3rd release.
dt.
这篇关于IronPython-0.6现已推出！的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
