C ++ ......它快死了吗？ [英] C++... is it dying?
问题描述
这是一个经常性和根深蒂固的渗透这个群体...因此
这样对待它
我最近开始了一份新工作，并且令我惊讶的是，我们仍然写了相当传统的c ++代码，仍然使用原始指针，并仍然在我们的产品的市场中使用。
多受欢迎是这种情况吗？
C ++的未来是什么，除了停止多年的
维持？
新的标准化为c ++开发人员和
应用创造了新的市场，它是否会扩展应用领域？
这些是广泛的问题，寻求一些保证，希望......好吧，
也许不那么戏剧化，但我真的好奇其他人的想法
约。
PuzzleCrakcer！
This is a recurring and entrenched permeating this group... hence
treat it as such
I have recently started a new job, and to my surprise, we still write
a fairly traditional c++ code, still using raw pointers, and still in
market with our products.
How popular is this scenario?
What''s the future for C++, other than ceasing years of
maintainance ?
Will new standardization create new markets for c++ developers and
applications, will it expand the application domain?
These are broad questions, seeking some reassurance, hope... well,
perhaps not so dramatic, but am genuinely curious what other think
about.
PuzzleCrakcer!
推荐答案
puzzlecracker写道：
puzzlecracker writes:
这是一个反复出现的根深蒂固的群体...因此
这样对待
我最近开始了一份新工作，令我惊讶的是，我们仍然写了相当传统的c ++代码。使用原始指针，仍然在我们的产品市场上。
这种情况有多受欢迎？
This is a recurring and entrenched permeating this group... hence
treat it as such
I have recently started a new job, and to my surprise, we still write
a fairly traditional c++ code, still using raw pointers, and still in
market with our products.
How popular is this scenario?
相当受欢迎，我会说。在宏伟的计划中，STL最近成熟了相当于
。很多代码仍然存在，可以追溯到STL之前的日子。
Fairly popular, I''d say. In the grand scheme of things, STL matured fairly
recently. Plenty of code still around, dating back from pre-STL days.
C ++的未来是什么，除了停止多年的
维持？
What''s the future for C++, other than ceasing years of
maintainance ?
新开发，未来，应使用STL和现代语言
功能。
New development, going forward, should use STL, and modern language
features.
新标准化是否会为c ++开发人员和b
应用创造新的市场，它是否会扩展应用领域？
Will new standardization create new markets for c++ developers and
applications, will it expand the application domain?
我相信熟练的C ++开发人员会有很多新市场，因为技能较低的开发人员会迁移到Java和Java。 NYET和
当管理层认识到编写良好，高效的C ++代码时，b $ b将把猴子从Java和.NYET中捣乱。
----- BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE -----
版本：GnuPG v1.4.9（GNU / Linux）
iEYEABECAAYFAkiDcbgACgkQx9p3GYHlUOI1bQCdG + b / vmKq7DKcsvQy3 / Z5ej88
bWwAn0osvv5JnncmEVcoSsxtUfNX4lPL
= pSOG
----- END PGP SIGNATURE -----
I believe that there will be plenty of new markets for skilled C++
developers, as less-skilled developers will migrate to Java and .NYET, and
when management comes to a realization that well-written, efficient C++ code
will spank the monkey out of Java and .NYET.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAkiDcbgACgkQx9p3GYHlUOI1bQCdG+b/vmKq7DKcsvQy3/Z5ej88
bWwAn0osvv5JnncmEVcoSsxtUfNX4lPL
=pSOG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
7月20日下午12:36，puzzlecracker< ironsel2 ... @ gmail.comwrote：
On Jul 20, 12:36 pm, puzzlecracker <ironsel2...@gmail.comwrote:
这是一个经常性和根深蒂固的渗透这个群体...因此
这样对待它
我最近开始了一份新工作，并且令我惊讶的是，我们仍然使用raw来编写相当传统的c ++代码指针，还在我们的产品市场上。
这个场景有多受欢迎？
什么'是否是C ++的未来，除了停止多年的维护？
新的标准化是否会为c ++开发人员创造新市场和
应用程序，它会扩展应用程序域吗？
This is a recurring and entrenched permeating this group... hence
treat it as such
I have recently started a new job, and to my surprise, we still write
a fairly traditional c++ code, still using raw pointers, and still in
market with our products.
How popular is this scenario?
What''s the future for C++, other than ceasing years of
maintainance ?
Will new standardization create new markets for c++ developers and
applications, will it expand the application domain?
C ++迫切需要支持多线程/任务恕我直言。
C++ urgently needs support for multi-threading/tasking IMHO.
>
这些是广泛的问题，寻求一些保证，希望......好吧，
也许不那么戏剧化，但我真的好奇其他人的想法
。 br />
PuzzleCrakcer！
>
These are broad questions, seeking some reassurance, hope... well,
perhaps not so dramatic, but am genuinely curious what other think
about.
PuzzleCrakcer!
On Sun，2008年7月20日09:36:27 -0700（PDT），puzzlecracker写道：
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:36:27 -0700 (PDT), puzzlecracker wrote:
>我最近开始了一份新工作，令我惊讶的是，我们仍然写了一个相当传统的c ++代码，仍然使用原始指针，仍然在我们的产品市场上。
>I have recently started a new job, and to my surprise, we still write
a fairly traditional c++ code, still using raw pointers, and still in
market with our products.
因为编写真实C ++代码的传统方式仍然比现代C ++更好。
because the ''traditional'' way of writing real-world C++ code is still
better than ''modern'' C++.
>这种情况有多受欢迎？
>How popular is this scenario?
很受欢迎。即使谷歌使用它。
very popular. Even Google uses it.
>除了停止多年的维护之外，C ++的未来是什么？
>What''s the future for C++, other than ceasing years of
maintainance ?
如果你重视相对
的安全工作，维护编程并不是那么糟糕。维护一个庞大的代码库并理解后面的
域逻辑绝非易事。
Maintainance programming isn''t that bad if you value a relatively
secure job. Maintaining a large grown code base and understanding the
domain logic behind is anything but simple.
>新的标准化是否会创造新的市场c ++开发人员和应用程序，它会扩展应用程序域吗？
>Will new standardization create new markets for c++ developers and
applications, will it expand the application domain?
我迄今为止看到的新标准中没有任何内容支持这个
的推测。恰恰相反。 C ++标准委员会似乎已经失去了与真实C ++编程的任何联系。他们试图为已经过于复杂的语言增加更多的复杂性。
Nothing from the new Standard I''ve seen so far supports this
speculation. Quite the contrary. The C++ Standards committee seems to
have lost any contact with real-world C++ programming. They attempt to
add even more complexity to an already over-complex language.
>这些是广泛的问题，寻求一些保证，希望......好吧，
也许不那么引人注目，但我真的很好奇其他人的想法。
>These are broad questions, seeking some reassurance, hope... well,
perhaps not so dramatic, but am genuinely curious what other think
about.
C ++在某些利基中仍然很强大，它主要用作更好的C（带有类的C）。如今的招聘广告经常寻找C / C ++
技能，而不是纯粹的C或C ++技能。
-
Roland Pibinger
最好的软件简单，优雅，充满戏剧性 - Grady Booch
C++ is still strong in certain niches where it is mostly used as a
better C (C with classes). Job ads nowadays often look for C/C++
skills instead of ''pure'' C or C++ skills.
--
Roland Pibinger
"The best software is simple, elegant, and full of drama" - Grady Booch
这篇关于C ++ ......它快死了吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
