安全C草案 [英] Draft Secure C
问题描述
http://www.open-std.org/ jtc1 / sc22 / wg14 /
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...docs/n1135.pdf
有没有人走了通过这个？
这有用吗？是否会达到下一个标准？
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...docs/n1135.pdf
Has anyone gone through this?
Is this useful? Will it make it to the next standard?
推荐答案
Jack写道：
Jack wrote:
< a rel =nofollowhref =http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/target =_ blank> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/ wg14 /
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...docs/n1135.pdf
有没有人经历过这个？
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...docs/n1135.pdf
Has anyone gone through this?
是。
Yes.
这有用吗？
Is this useful?
不在我看来，但其他人不同。
Not in my opinion, but others differ.
是否会达到下一个标准？
Will it make it to the next standard?
让我们不希望。
Robert Gamble
Let''s hope not.
Robert Gamble
Robert Gamble说：
Robert Gamble said:
Jack写道：
Jack wrote:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...docs/n1135.pdf
有没有人经历过这个？
>http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...docs/n1135.pdf
Has anyone gone through this?
是。
Yes.
>这有用吗？
>Is this useful?
不在我看来，但其他人不同。
Not in my opinion, but others differ.
>它会进入下一个标准？
>Will it make it to the next standard?
让我们不希望。
Let''s hope not.
好吧，让我们至少希望我们不会开始设计新标准，直到
C99已被广泛实施。什么是*点*？
-
Richard Heathfield
Usenet是一个奇怪的地方 - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
电子邮件：rjh在上述域名中， - www。
Well, let''s at least hope that we don''t start designing a new Standard until
C99 has been widely implemented. What would be the *point*?
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
Richard Heathfield写道：
Richard Heathfield wrote:
Robert Gamble说：
Robert Gamble said:
Jack写道：
Jack wrote:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/
http：// www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...docs/n1135.pdf
有没有人经历过这个？
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...docs/n1135.pdf
Has anyone gone through this?
是。
Yes.
这有用吗？
Is this useful?
不在我看来，但其他人不同。
Not in my opinion, but others differ.
是否会达到下一个标准？
Will it make it to the next standard?
让我们不希望。
Let''s hope not.
好吧，让我们至少希望我们不会开始设计新标准，直到
C99已被广泛实施。重点是什么*？
Well, let''s at least hope that we don''t start designing a new Standard until
C99 has been widely implemented. What would be the *point*?
我认为新标准具有经过深思熟虑的功能，而b / b $ b反映了社区最重要的价值可能实际上有助于增加/>
其他C99功能的采用速度比不快。如果一个新的
版本提供的功能可以让社区大多数人感到兴奋并且反弹，那么毫无疑问
的实现者会以更快的速度实施它。这样一个b
的冒险需要非常小心，不要陷入各种剧烈的变化，特殊利益和（某些
考虑）C99带来的不必要的臃肿以免它贬值
进一步危及标准的相关性，但成功可能是
唯一赎回的东西它。 TR 24731符合至少
特殊利益的资格。臃肿。
Robert Gamble
I think that a new Standard with carefully thought-out features which
reflect what the community values most may actually serve to increase
adoption of the rest of the C99 features faster than not. If a new
version provided functionality that the majority of the community could
get excited about and rally behind there is little doubt that
implementors would move at a much faster pace to implement it. Such a
venture would need to be extremely careful not to get bogged down with
the kinds of drastic changes, "special interests", and (what some
consider) unnecessary bloat that C99 brought along with it lest it
further jeopardize the relevance of the Standard, but success may be
the only thing that redeems it. TR 24731 qualifies for at least
"special interest" and bloat.
Robert Gamble
这篇关于安全C草案的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
