MinGW和Python [英] MinGW and Python

问题描述

是否有任何具体原因不使用MinGW为Win32构建官方

的Python发行版？

快速谷歌搜索没有透露我的问题的答案。如果有

链接，请发布。


最诚挚的问候，

Srijit

Is there any specific reason for not using MinGW to build the official
distribution of Python for Win32?
A quick Google search did not reveal the answer to my question. If a
link is available, please post it.

Best Regards,
Srijit

推荐答案

Srijit Kumar Bhadra写道：

Srijit Kumar Bhadra wrote:

是否有任何具体原因不使用MinGW构建Python的官方分发for Win32？

Is there any specific reason for not using MinGW to build the official
distribution of Python for Win32?

使用MinGW的原因是什么？


至于不这样做的理由：

- 没有可用的构建过程

- 构建Python扩展的人必须能够使用

Microsoft C ++，因为一些这些扩展是使用MFC编写的。

- 在Visual Studio中开发Python本身非常方便;在

特别是，调试器工作更好比gdb。


问候，

马丁

What could be the reasons to use MinGW?

As for reasons not to do that:
- there is no build process available to do that
- people building extensions to Python must be able to do so with
Microsoft C++, since some of these extensions are written using MFC.
- developing Python itself in Visual Studio is quite convenient; in
particular, the debugger works "better" than gdb.

Regards,
Martin

>是否有任何具体原因不使用MinGW为Win32构建官方的

> Is there any specific reason for not using MinGW to build the official

Python分发？
快速的Google搜索没有透露我的问题的答案。如果有
链接，请发布。

distribution of Python for Win32?
A quick Google search did not reveal the answer to my question. If a
link is available, please post it.

您可以查看以下主题：


* E02 - 支持MinGW开源编译器
http://tinyurl.com/lxfsz

有一个很大的争论，它真的很长，但那里有一些有用的

帖子。


问候，

Josef

You may look at this thread:

* E02 - Support for MinGW Open Source Compiler
http://tinyurl.com/lxfsz

There was a big polemic and it is really long, but there are some useful
posts there.

Regards,
Josef

Martin v.L ?? wis写道：

Martin v. L??wis wrote:

Srijit Kumar Bhadra写道：

Srijit Kumar Bhadra wrote:

是否有任何具体原因不使用MinGW为Win32构建Python官方分发版？

Is there any specific reason for not using MinGW to build the official
distribution of Python for Win32?

可能是什么使用MinGW的原因是什么？

至于不这样做的原因：
- 没有可用的构建过程
- 构建Python扩展的人必须能够使用Microsoft C ++这样做，因为其中一些扩展是usi编写的ng MFC。
- 在Visual Studio中开发Python本身非常方便;特别是，调试器工作更好。比gdb。

What could be the reasons to use MinGW?

As for reasons not to do that:
- there is no build process available to do that
- people building extensions to Python must be able to do so with
Microsoft C++, since some of these extensions are written using MFC.
- developing Python itself in Visual Studio is quite convenient; in
particular, the debugger works "better" than gdb.

- gcc没有特别好的优化。


-

Robert Kern
ro*********@gmail.com


我已经开始相信整个世界都是一个谜，一个无害的谜团

由于我们疯狂地试图解释它而使它变得可怕

一个潜在的事实。

- Umberto Eco

- gcc does not optimize particularly well.

--
Robert Kern
ro*********@gmail.com

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco

这篇关于MinGW和Python的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！