感兴趣的文章：Python对企业的利弊 [英] Article of interest: Python pros/cons for the enterprise
问题描述
这是研究各种脚本语言的优点和缺点的系列文章的一部分，特别关注企业使用。
（读：大公司）使用。 />
您使用Python编写什么内容？
Python是一种功能强大，易于使用的脚本语言，适用于
企业，虽然它绝对不适合每一次使用。
Python专家Martin Aspeli确定何时选择Python是正确的，而另一种语言可能是更好的选择。
http://www.cio.com/article/185350
This is part of a series examining the strengths and weaknesses of
various scripting languages, with particular attention to enterprise
(read: big company) use.
You Used Python to Write WHAT?
Python is a powerful, easy-to-use scripting language suitable for use
in the enterprise, although it is not right for absolutely every use.
Python expert Martin Aspeli identifies when Python is the right
choice, and when another language might be a better option.
http://www.cio.com/article/185350
推荐答案
你用Python写什么？
You Used Python to Write WHAT?
http：//www.cio。 com / article / 185350
"""
此外，Python提供的强大功能和表现力意味着
它可能需要更熟练的开发人员。
[...直到摘要...]
如果您符合以下条件，Python可能不是一个合适的选择： br />
[...]
*依靠经验不足的程序员团队。这些
开发人员可以从更广泛的培训中受益，对于像Java这样的语言而言，b / b
a编译时不太可能犯错误，类型检查语言。
"""
哦，不！您可能需要能够胜任的程序员，实际上他们正在理解他们正在做什么！
（他们甚至可能必须编写测试代码以确保他们的
代码按预期工作...... Python包含
unittest和doctest模块在库存安装中是件好事）
叹气。任何能够克服学习障碍的程序员都可以快速/轻松地学习Python，只要他们愿意忘记一些不良习惯。 $ b。 br />
-tkc
"""
Furthermore, the power and expressivity that Python offers means
that it may require more skilled developers.
[...down to the summary...]
Python may not be an appropriate choice if you:
[...]
* Rely on teams of less-experienced programmers. These
developers may benefit from the wider availability of training
for languages like Java and are less likely to make mistakes with
a compile-time, type-checked language.
"""
Oh noes! You might need competent programmers that actually
understand what they''re doing!
(they might even have to write testing code to make sure their
code works as intended...it''s a good thing that Python includes
unittest and doctest modules in the stock install)
Sigh. Any programmer that can overcome the hurdles of learning
Java or C# can quickly/easily pick up Python as long as they''re
willing to unlearn some bad habits.
-tkc
2月20日上午8:58，Tim Chase< python.l ... @ tim。 thechases.comwrote：
On Feb 20, 8:58 am, Tim Chase <python.l...@tim.thechases.comwrote:
你用Python写什么？
http://www.cio.com/article/185350
" "
此外，Python提供的强大功能和表现力意味着它可能需要更多熟练的开发人员。
[...到总结...]
如果您符合以下条件，Python可能不是一个合适的选择：
[...]
*依赖经验不足的程序员团队。这些
开发人员可以从更广泛的培训中受益，对于像Java这样的语言而言，b / b
a编译时不太可能犯错误，类型检查语言。
"""
哦，不！您可能需要能够胜任的程序员，实际上他们正在理解他们正在做什么！
（他们甚至可能必须编写测试代码以确保他们的
代码按预期工作...... Python包含
unittest和doctest模块在库存安装中是件好事）
叹气。任何能够克服学习障碍的程序员只要他们愿意忘掉一些坏习惯，就可以快速/轻松地学习Python。
"""
Furthermore, the power and expressivity that Python offers means
that it may require more skilled developers.
[...down to the summary...]
Python may not be an appropriate choice if you:
[...]
* Rely on teams of less-experienced programmers. These
developers may benefit from the wider availability of training
for languages like Java and are less likely to make mistakes with
a compile-time, type-checked language.
"""
Oh noes! You might need competent programmers that actually
understand what they''re doing!
(they might even have to write testing code to make sure their
code works as intended...it''s a good thing that Python includes
unittest and doctest modules in the stock install)
Sigh. Any programmer that can overcome the hurdles of learning
Java or C# can quickly/easily pick up Python as long as they''re
willing to unlearn some bad habits.
C ++是一种编译时，类型检查的语言，这意味着新手比Python更安全。是的，你的大公司对新手C ++程序员来说是完全安全的。
Carl Banks
C++ is a compile-time, type-checked language, which means it is
totally safer for newbies than Python. Yep, your big company is
totally safe with newbie C++ programmers.
Carl Banks
Carl Banksaécrit ：
Carl Banks a écrit :
2月20日上午8:58，Tim Chase< python.l ... @ tim.thechases.comwrote：
On Feb 20, 8:58 am, Tim Chase <python.l...@tim.thechases.comwrote:
>>你用Python写什么？
http://www.cio.com/article/185350
"""
此外， Python提供的强大功能和表现力意味着它可能需要更多技术熟练的开发人员。
[...总结......]如果您：
"""
Furthermore, the power and expressivity that Python offers means
that it may require more skilled developers.
[...down to the summary...]
Python may not be an appropriate choice if you:
[...]
* Rely on teams of less-experienced programmers. These
developers may benefit from the wider availability of training
for languages like Java and are less likely to make mistakes with
a compile-time, type-checked language.
"""
（snip）
(snip)
>
C ++是一种编译时，类型检查的语言，这意味着新手比Python更安全。是的，你的大公司对新手C ++程序员来说是完全安全的。
>
C++ is a compile-time, type-checked language, which means it is
totally safer for newbies than Python. Yep, your big company is
totally safe with newbie C++ programmers.
Mouarf！ Brillant示范，谢谢Carl！ - ）
（和BTW，+ 1 QOTW）
Mouarf ! Brillant demonstration, thanks Carl !-)
(and BTW, +1 QOTW)
这篇关于感兴趣的文章：Python对企业的利弊的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
