典型的默认字体大小 [英] typical default font sizes
问题描述
我一直在设置font-size 1em;作为我风格的默认值
张。到现在为止，这似乎没问题。但是现在我开始想了。
奇怪。
我的目标是在
$时有一个易读的，但不是太大的文字b $ b用户在浏览器中使用默认字体大小并使用
典型的显示分辨率。
我在一个友好的浏览器中重新安装了不同的环境，
我惊讶地发现它的serif默认是Times 16和
monospace是Courier 12.
我运行1280 x 1024分辨率，页面上的文字默认显示
太大。鉴于我的决议，我本可以预期
相反。我认为今天典型的分辨率是1024 x
768.如果是这样，我的浏览器默认字体大小不适合吗？
文本在我的网页上现在显得太小了。典型的和
默认情况似乎使我的文本行几乎难以辨认。
-
海恩斯·布朗
br****@hartford-hwp.com
kb **** @ arrl.net
www.hartford-hwp.com
I''ve been setting font-size 1em; as the default in my style
sheets. Until now, that seemed to be ok. But now I''m beginning to
wonder.
My aim is to have an easily readable, but not overly large text when
the user uses the default font size in his browser and uses the
typical display resolution.
I did a reinstall of my friendly browser in a different environment,
and I am surprised to find that its default for serif is Times 16 and
monospace is Courier 12.
I run a 1280 x 1024 resolution, and the text on page default appears
too large. Given my resolution, I would have expected just the
opposite. I gather that typical today is a resolution of 1024 x
768. If so, would not my browser default font size be suited to that?
The text on my web pages now appears too small. The typical and
default situation seems to make my text lines almost illegible.
--
Haines Brown
br****@hartford-hwp.com
kb****@arrl.net
www.hartford-hwp.com
推荐答案
Haines Brown< br **** @ teufel。 hartford-hwp.com>写道：
Haines Brown <br****@teufel.hartford-hwp.com> wrote:
我一直在设置font-size 1em;作为我的风格
表格的默认值。
为什么？
我认为今天典型的分辨率是1024 x
768.如果是这样，我的浏览器默认字体大小不会是适合那个？
I''ve been setting font-size 1em; as the default in my style
sheets.
Why?
I gather that typical today is a resolution of 1024 x
768. If so, would not my browser default font size be suited to that?
您的问题或问题究竟是什么？
设置基本字体大小的问题有一直在讨论令人作呕。当然，
正确的答案是，只有用户才能知道什么是适合他的b $ b。浏览器默认设置通常太大了，但是那个'/ b $ b可能是_intentional_，当然有用。使用一个比一个太小的字体太大的
当然更好。
无知的作者谁猜测浏览器供应商猜错了
必然会造成损害。这是供应商得到的_right_。
-
Yucca， http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Haines Brown写道：
Haines Brown wrote:
我在不同的环境中重新安装了友好的浏览器，
我惊讶地发现它的serif默认是Times 16和
monospace是Courier 12.
这是非常令人惊讶的。
我运行1280 x 1024分辨率，页面上的文字默认显示
太大。鉴于我的解决方案，我本可以预期
相反。我认为今天典型的分辨率是1024 x
768.如果是这样，我的浏览器默认字体大小不适合吗？
分辨率没有说明文字的大小。分辨率和
物理屏幕大小可以为您提供DPI。但是，如果我们是b $ b b谈话点，那么它就会变得无关紧要，因为这是一个绝对单位（1pt约为1/72英寸）。当然浏览器必须知道DPI才能正确计算出一个点的大小，所以它会再次被抛出
。
我网页上的文字现在显得太小了。典型和
默认情况似乎使我的文本行几乎难以辨认。
I did a reinstall of my friendly browser in a different environment,
and I am surprised to find that its default for serif is Times 16 and
monospace is Courier 12.
That is very surprising.
I run a 1280 x 1024 resolution, and the text on page default appears
too large. Given my resolution, I would have expected just the
opposite. I gather that typical today is a resolution of 1024 x
768. If so, would not my browser default font size be suited to that?
Resolution says nothing about the size of text. Resolution together with
physical screen size can give you the DPI which does. However, if we are
talking points, then it becomes irrelevent again becuase points are an
absolute unit (1pt is about 1/72 of an inch). Of course the browser has to
know the DPI to correctly calculate the size of a point, so it gets thrown
out of wack again.
The text on my web pages now appears too small. The typical and
default situation seems to make my text lines almost illegible.
首先你说你将字体大小设置为1em，然后你说字体大小
你选择的浏览器的作者对你来说太大了，然后没有
提到任何变化，你说网页是不可读的吗？
< br $> b $ b -
David Dorward http：// dorward.me.uk/
" Jukka K. Korpela" < JK ****** @ cs.tut.fi>写在
新闻：Xn ***************************** @ 193.229.0.31：
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jk******@cs.tut.fi> wrote in
news:Xn*****************************@193.229.0.31:
无知的作者谁猜测浏览器供应商猜错了
肯定会造成损害。这是供应商得到的东西............
Clueless authors who second-guess that browser vendors guessed wrong
are bound to cause damage. This is something that the vendors got
_right_.
Jukka，你介意扩展_Why_浏览器供应商得到这个
对（特别是IE Windows）。不是在这里寻找一场战斗，但是我已经发现自己被Owen Briggs的Sane CSS Sizes页面所说服了。
http：//www.thenoodleincident .com / tut ... phy / index.html
是否有任何理由_not_采用他简单但有效的解决方案
这个常青问题？对于我自己，我尝试使用默认大小
，但发现用户在看到网站时首先说的是：
"你能否让文字更小？"我当然在这里说赢IE用户。
-
Regds，Bob Osola
Jukka, would you mind expanding on _why_ the browser vendors got this
right (IE Windows in particular). Not looking for a fight here, but I have
found myself rather persuaded by Owen Briggs'' page on "Sane CSS Sizes" at
http://www.thenoodleincident.com/tut...phy/index.html
Is there any reason _not_ to adopt his simple but effective solution to
this evergreen issue? For myself, I have tried going with default sizes
but have found that the very first thing users say on seeing the site is:
"Can you make the text smaller?" I''m talking Win IE users here, of course.
--
Regds, Bob Osola
这篇关于典型的默认字体大小的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
