c.l.c.的最新版本。常问问题 [英] Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ

问题描述

大家好，


现在不是时候更新
$ b $的某些部分的措辞了吗？ b clc常问问题 ？我认为，最后一次更新是在1999年，并且从那时起发生的相当多的

应该得到解决（介绍

of C99 final，for one thing） 。


此外，将文本版本与

免费提供的HTML和可打印版本同步是个好主意。

关于常见问题解答文本，我看到它的版权归Steve Summit所有，并且还有

a书籍版本。我非常感谢他们毫无疑问已经付出了这些努力，但这不应该是正确的吗？

属于公共领域？

祝你好运，


Sidney

Hi all,

Isn''t it time for an update of the wording in some sections of the
c.l.c. FAQ ? The last update has been in 1999, I think, and quite a bit
that has happened since then should probably be addressed (introduction
of C99 final, for one thing).

Also, it would be a good idea to synchronise the text version with the
freely available HTML and printable versions.

As to the FAQ text, I see it is copyrighted by Steve Summit, and there''s
a book version available as well. I appreciate the efforts he
undoubtedly has put into this, but shouldn''t this kind of thing properly
belong in the public domain?

Best regards,

Sidney

推荐答案

Sidney Cadot< si****@jigsaw.nl>写道：

Sidney Cadot <si****@jigsaw.nl> writes:

至于常见问题解答文本，我认为它的版权归Steve Summit所有，并且还有书籍版本。我很感激他无疑在这方面所付出的努力，但这不应该属于公共领域吗？

As to the FAQ text, I see it is copyrighted by Steve Summit, and
there''s a book version available as well. I appreciate the efforts he
undoubtedly has put into this, but shouldn''t this kind of thing
properly belong in the public domain?

为什么？他写道，他为什么要放弃版权呢？

Why? He wrote it, why should he give up copyright on it?

Ben Pfaff写道：

Ben Pfaff wrote:

Sidney Cadot< si * ***@jigsaw.nl>写道：

Sidney Cadot <si****@jigsaw.nl> writes:

关于常见问题解答文本，我看到它的版权归Steve Summit所有，并且
还有一本书版本。我很感激他无疑为此付出的努力，但这不应该属于公共领域吗？

As to the FAQ text, I see it is copyrighted by Steve Summit, and
there''s a book version available as well. I appreciate the efforts he
undoubtedly has put into this, but shouldn''t this kind of thing
properly belong in the public domain?

为什么？他写道，他为什么要放弃版权呢？

Why? He wrote it, why should he give up copyright on it?

抱马......我从来没有说过他应该，是吗？我希望

他会/考虑/它，所有的优点和缺点。


我认为如果常见问题解答在那里会更方便公众

域名。出于这样或那样的原因，它似乎并不是非常积极地维持b $ b;另一方面，如果史蒂夫发生某种情况，那么他将无法进行维护，没有人可以将他的工作作为一个版本的广泛基础。由于版权（我认为），将保持

。这肯定是不可取的？


致敬，Sidney

Hold your horses.... I never said he should, did I? I would perhaps hope
he would /consider/ it, with all pros and cons.

I do think it would be more convenient if the FAQ were in the public
domain. For one reason or another, it doesn''t seem to be very actively
maintained; for another thing, if something would happen to Steve that
would make it impossible for him to do maintenance, nobody could use his
work as an extensive basis for a version that would be maintained
because of the copyright (I think). That would surely be undesirable?

Best regards, Sidney

Sidney Cadot< si **** @ jigsaw.nl>写道：

Sidney Cadot <si****@jigsaw.nl> writes:

Ben Pfaff写道：

Ben Pfaff wrote:

Sidney Cadot< si **** @ jigsaw.nl>写道：

Sidney Cadot <si****@jigsaw.nl> writes:

至于常见问题解答文本，我认为它的版权归Steve Summit所有，并且还有书籍版本。我很感激他无疑在这方面做出的努力，但这不应该属于公共领域吗？

As to the FAQ text, I see it is copyrighted by Steve Summit, and
there''s a book version available as well. I appreciate the efforts he
undoubtedly has put into this, but shouldn''t this kind of thing
properly belong in the public domain?

为什么？他写道，他为什么要放弃版权呢？

Why? He wrote it, why should he give up copyright on it?

抱着你的马......我从来没有说过他应该，是吗？我或许希望他会/考虑/考虑所有优点和缺点。

我认为如果常见问题解答是在公共领域，会更方便。 [...]

Hold your horses.... I never said he should, did I? I would perhaps
hope he would /consider/ it, with all pros and cons.

I do think it would be more convenient if the FAQ were in the public
domain. [...]

哦，当然。但史蒂夫告诉他

，他的作品属于公共领域的正确归属，这有点苛刻。基于

我自己努力写出一些常见问题解答答案，我肯定

他在C上投入了大量的时间和精力常见问题。

-

调试的难度是首先编写代码的两倍。

因此，如果你写的话代码尽可能巧妙，你是，根据定义，
，不够聪明，不能调试它。

--Brian Kernighan

Oh, definitely. But it''s a little harsh on Steve to tell him
that his work "properly belong[s] in the public domain." Based
on my own efforts to write up just a few FAQ answers, I''m sure
he''s put an enormous amount of time and effort into the C FAQ.
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan

这篇关于c.l.c.的最新版本。常问问题的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！