CSS表不实用? [英] CSS Tables not practical?

查看:49
本文介绍了CSS表不实用?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

CSS专家:


好​​吧,我是一个愚蠢的新手。现在,问题是:


CSS可以替换稍微复杂的表并在三个
浏览器中工作(例如MSIE 6.0,Net 7.1,Op 7.03 )?


经过无数次的尝试,我已经结束了没有。


谢谢,


Mason C


(不相关;仅用于识别: http://masonc.home.netcom.com

CSS Experts:

OK, I''m a stupid newby. Now, here''s the question:

Can CSS replace slightly complicated Tables and work in three
browsers (e.g. MSIE 6.0, Net 7.1, Op 7.03) ?

After countless attempts I''ve concluded "no".

Thank you,

Mason C

( not pertinent; for identification only: http://masonc.home.netcom.com )

推荐答案

2004年1月14日星期三21:30 :56 GMT,Mason A. Clark

< ma ******* @ THISix.netcom.comQ>写道:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:30:56 GMT, Mason A. Clark
<ma*******@THISix.netcom.comQ> wrote:
CSS可以替换稍微复杂的表并在三个浏览器中工作(例如MSIE 6.0,Net 7.1,Op 7.03)吗?

之后无数次尝试我已经结束了不。
Can CSS replace slightly complicated Tables and work in three
browsers (e.g. MSIE 6.0, Net 7.1, Op 7.03) ?

After countless attempts I''ve concluded "no".




如果它是真正的表格,使用表格数据,请使用表格。


取决于您如何定义稍微复杂。小心提供你要转换的

桌面设计的URL?


和BTW,这有点像问你在哪里可以找到合法的成年工人

谁会像你雇佣孩子那样便宜地给你可比的生产

奴隶劳工。显然,通过使用

CSS不会轻易复制的表格标记,可能会出现布局错误。随着CSS的发展,我认为你会看到越来越多的可能。



If it''s a true table, with tabular data, use the table.

Depends on how you define "slightly complicated". Care to offer a URL to a
table design you would like to convert?

And BTW, it''s a little like asking where you can find legal adult workers
who will give you comparable production as cheaply as you can employ child
slave labor. Obviously there are going to be layouts possible through the
misuse of table markup which aren''t going to be easily replicated using
CSS. As CSS develops, I think you''ll see more and more possible.


Mason A. Clark< ma ******* @ THISix.netcom。 COMQ>写道:
Mason A. Clark <ma*******@THISix.netcom.comQ> wrote:
CSS专家:

好的,我是一个愚蠢的新手。现在,问题是:

CSS可以替换稍微复杂的表并在三个浏览器中工作(例如MSIE 6.0,Net 7.1,Op 7.03)吗?
CSS Experts:

OK, I''m a stupid newby. Now, here''s the question:

Can CSS replace slightly complicated Tables and work in three
browsers (e.g. MSIE 6.0, Net 7.1, Op 7.03) ?

After countless attempts I''ve concluded "no".




IE不支持CSS表。请注意,CSS表将用于

布局,而不是替换常规表。


-

Spartanicus



IE does not support CSS tables. Note that CSS tables are to be used for
layout, not to replace regular tables.

--
Spartanicus


2004年1月14日星期三,Mason A. Clark写道:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Mason A. Clark wrote:
CSS可以取代稍微复杂的表并在三个工作/>浏览器(例如MSIE 6.0,Net 7.1,Op 7.03)?


不清楚。如果我感觉很慷慨,我想你会问可以用CSS做

用来做页面布局,而不是(错误)使用表格吗?我对此感兴趣/>
会回答是有信心的。但是,考虑到

帐户的浏览器,你必须灵活,并且b / b
务实,并偶尔做出重大妥协。


如果我不是那么慷慨,那么我担心你有一些误导的

通过某种CSS定位替换表格数据的概念,

我会回复不要那样做。

经过无数次的尝试,我得出了不。


我们也可能需要了解你如何理解这个术语

work。对我来说,网页有效。当它平静地适应并且没有在广泛的演示情况下大惊小怪的时候;它也应该,自然,至少在主流浏览

的情况下,视觉上有吸引力,但没有终端用户会像素精确的那样奖励积分

不同浏览器中演示文稿的标识 -

对作品的解释我的意见很可能适得其反。


如果你学到了
,我的印象就是你会得到更好的结果
样式表设计的各个方面从头开始,这样你就可以用他们自己的条件自信地与他们合作,而不需要任何

参考之前的HTML3。 2-ish技术。


一旦你错误地设定了自己明确的目标

的替换一些新的替代品已被弃用,你已经通过引入不必要的限制和妥协使问题变得更加困难。在获得自信的工作知识后,可以更容易地解决这样一个人工任务。但是在开始时最好用自己的方式使用

CSS页面设计,而不是用某种类型的b $ b来代替那些劣质的东西。根本意义。

无论如何,这是我的建议 - 至少值得你付出的代价

;-)


在此之前,只需抛弃所有旧的布局标记,保留内容

以及它可能具有的任何结构上重要的标记,然后从第一个开始设计

分离内容的原则来自

演示文稿。

(不相关;仅用于识别: http://masonc.home.netcom.com
Can CSS replace slightly complicated Tables and work in three
browsers (e.g. MSIE 6.0, Net 7.1, Op 7.03) ?
Unclear. If I''m feeling generous, I think you''re asking "can CSS be
used to do page layout, instead of (mis)using tables?", to which I
would answer "yes" with reasonable confidence. But, taking into
account the browsers that are out there, you have to be flexible and
pragmatic, and occasionally make significant compromises.

If I''m not so generous, then I worry that you have some misguided
notion of replacing tabular data by some kind of CSS positioning, to
which I would reply "don''t do that".
After countless attempts I''ve concluded "no".
We also probably need to understand how you interpret the term
"works". For me, a web page "works" when it adapts calmly and without
fuss to a wide range of presentation situations; it should also,
naturally, be visually attractive in at least the mainstream browsing
situation, but no end-users are going to award points for pixel-exact
identity of the presentation in different browsers - that
interpretation of "works" is quite likely to be counterproductive in
my opinion.

It''s my impression that you get much better results if you learn the
various aspects of stylesheet design from the ground up, so that you
can work with them confidently in their own terms, without any
reference to previous HTML3.2-ish techniques.

Once you''ve made the mistake of setting yourself the explicit target
of "replacing" some deprecated thing by some new replacement, you''ve
made the problem extra difficult by introducing unnecessary
constraints and compromises. After gaining a confident working
knowledge of the available features, it then becomes easier to solve
such an artificial task; but at the beginning it''s better to work with
CSS page designs in their own right, rather than as some kind of
substitute for something that was inferior in the fundamental sense.
At any rate, that''s my advice - worth at least what you paid for it
;-)

Until then, just toss out all the old layout markup, keep the content
and any structurally-significant markup that it may have, and start
designing from first principles of separating content from
presentation.
( not pertinent; for identification only: http://masonc.home.netcom.com )




您可以从参与者那里获得更好的建议这个小组如果你愿意实际发布一个例子,那么。


祝你好运



You might get better advice from the participants on this group if you
were willing to actually post an example, though.

good luck


这篇关于CSS表不实用?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆