使用Access + DBMS与> 30个用户 [英] Using Access+DBMS with >30 users

查看:67
本文介绍了使用Access + DBMS与> 30个用户的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

您好,


我正在尝试确定以下情况是否可行:


生成MS Access前端(将在客户端计算机上运行localy),
将链接到DBMS(SQL服务器或Oracle)。据我所知,

约为。 30到40个用户最多在数据库上工作。我想

约。 25个用户实际上会输入数据(其他人将主要报告

和查看)。

我真的不知道网络容量。

另一种可能性是使用DBMS在VB.NET

环境中创建此前端。这只需要花费大约30%的时间来构建
(因为我们在这个

环境中没有准备好使用很多组件)。


我在访问数据库的性能上遇到了很多不同的问题,但是

他们主要关注Access后端的情况。

任何人都可以给我一些关于这个主题的论证或者一些利弊

用于Access vsVB选项。


Thanx,


Remco GB

解决方案

Remco Groot Beumer写道:

你好,
<我正在尝试确定以下情况是否可行:

生成MS Access前端(将在客户端计算机上运行localy),
将链接到DBMS(SQL服务器或Oracle)。据我所知,
将是约。 30到40个用户最多在数据库上工作。我想
约。 25个用户实际上将输入数据(其他人将主要报告
和查看)。
我真的不知道网络容量。

另一种可能性是创建这个在VB.NET
环境中使用前端,也使用DBMS。这只需要花费大约30%的时间来构建(因为我们没有很多组件可以在这个环境中使用)。

我有红色关于访问数据库性能的许多不同问题,但是他们主要关注Access后端的情况。
任何人都可以给我一些关于这个主题的论证或者一些优点和缺点对于Access vsVB选项。




我认为你在VB中开发的时间要多30%是非常乐观的。


访问 - > SQL Server * 40用户=没有性能问题。 IME。


-

[Oo = w = oO]


如果您可以一方面计算用户数,访问效果很好。如果你从一开始就这样做,SQL将保存你的移民痛苦。

Remco Groot Beumer <无**** @ nospam.com>在消息中写道

news:d3 ********** @ news6.zwoll1.ov.home.nl ...

你好,
我正在尝试确定以下情况是否可行:

生成MS Access前端(将在客户端
计算机上运行localy),
将链接到DBMS(SQL服务器或Oracle)。据我所知,
将是约。 30到40个用户最多在数据库上工作。我想
约。 25个用户实际上会输入数据(其他人将主要报告
和查看)。
我真的不知道网络容量。

另一种可能性就是是在VB.NET
环境中创建这个前端,也使用DBMS。这只会花费大约30%的时间来构建(因为我们没有很多组件可以在这个环境中使用)。

我在访问数据库的性能方面存在许多不同的问题,但是
他们主要关注Access后端的情况。
任何人都可以就此主题给我一些论证或者对于Access vsVB选项的一些优点和缺点。

Thanx,

Remco GB



Trevor,

我认为你在VB中开发的时间要多30%是非常乐观的。



你让我很好奇,你有什么参考资料吗?

" thinking"在?


(我认为你的意思是VB,VBNet因为有问题

左右)。


Cor


Hello,

I''m trying to decide if the following situation would be workable:

Generate an MS Access Front End (which will run localy on client computers),
which will link to a DBMS (SQL server or Oracle). As far as I know there
will be approx. 30 till 40 users max working on the database. I think
approx. 25 users will actually enter data (others will be mostly reporting
and viewing).
I don''t really know the network capacity.

Another possibilty would be to create this front end in a VB.NET
environment, using also a DBMS. This only will cost approx 30% more time to
build (since we do not have a lot of components ready for use in this
environment).

I''ve red a lot of different issues on performance of an access database, but
they mostly focus on the situation with an Access back end.
Can anybody give me some argumentation on this topic or some pros and cons
for the Access versusVB option.

Thanx ,

Remco GB

解决方案

Remco Groot Beumer wrote:

Hello,

I''m trying to decide if the following situation would be workable:

Generate an MS Access Front End (which will run localy on client computers),
which will link to a DBMS (SQL server or Oracle). As far as I know there
will be approx. 30 till 40 users max working on the database. I think
approx. 25 users will actually enter data (others will be mostly reporting
and viewing).
I don''t really know the network capacity.

Another possibilty would be to create this front end in a VB.NET
environment, using also a DBMS. This only will cost approx 30% more time to
build (since we do not have a lot of components ready for use in this
environment).

I''ve red a lot of different issues on performance of an access database, but
they mostly focus on the situation with an Access back end.
Can anybody give me some argumentation on this topic or some pros and cons
for the Access versusVB option.



I think your 30% more time to develop in VB is very optimistic.

Access -> SQL Server * 40 users = no problem performance wise. IME.

--
[Oo=w=oO]


Access works great if you can count the users on one hand. SQL will save
you migration pains if you do it from the start.
"Remco Groot Beumer" <no****@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:d3**********@news6.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...

Hello,

I''m trying to decide if the following situation would be workable:

Generate an MS Access Front End (which will run localy on client
computers),
which will link to a DBMS (SQL server or Oracle). As far as I know there
will be approx. 30 till 40 users max working on the database. I think
approx. 25 users will actually enter data (others will be mostly
reporting
and viewing).
I don''t really know the network capacity.

Another possibilty would be to create this front end in a VB.NET
environment, using also a DBMS. This only will cost approx 30% more time
to
build (since we do not have a lot of components ready for use in this
environment).

I''ve red a lot of different issues on performance of an access database,
but
they mostly focus on the situation with an Access back end.
Can anybody give me some argumentation on this topic or some pros and cons
for the Access versusVB option.

Thanx ,

Remco GB



Trevor,

I think your 30% more time to develop in VB is very optimistic.


You make me curious, have you any reference where you have based this
"thinking" on?

(I assume that you mean with VB, VBNet because there was the question
about).

Cor


这篇关于使用Access + DBMS与> 30个用户的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆