不要不要笑 [英] Don't no whether to laugh

查看:83
本文介绍了不要不要笑的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

http://msdn.microsoft .com / library / de ... l = / library / en-

us / vccore98 / HTML / _core_using_strict_type_checking.asp


支付特别注意:


类型WPARAM,LPARAM,LRESULT和void *是多态数据

类型。?

....微软什么时候会上交?

-JKop

解决方案



JKop < NU ** @ NULL.NULL>在消息中写道

news:tU ******************* @ news.indigo.ie ...

http://msdn.microsoft.com/ library / de ... l = / library / en-
us / vccore98 / HTML / _core_using_strict_type_checking.asp

特别注意:
WPARAM,LPARAM,LRESULT和void *类型是多态数据
类型。

......微软什么时候会报警?

-JKop




我不认为他们从OOP的角度提到了多态性。我认为他们认为一种类型可以有不同的含义,具体取决于它是如何使用的。例如,WORD可以用作整数值或作为对象的

引用。这可能是某种(奇怪的)多态性。


Catalin


JKop写道:

< a rel =nofollowhref =http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-target =_ blank> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library /de...l=/library/en-
我们/ vccore98 / HTML / _core_using_strict_type_checking.asp

特别注意:

WPARAM,LPARAM,LRESULT和void *类型是?多态数据
类型。?

......微软什么时候会报警?



多态数据类型(我想说,谷歌的前几个链接

WPARAM,LPARAM,LRESULT和void *都似乎满足了这个要求。


它们确实不是任何安全或类型的多态,但是

多态性。


也许在y之前你应该小心你开始侮辱微软? (或

指向您对多态数据类型的定义?)


Chris


多态数据类型(我想说,谷歌的前几个链接同意)是一种可以存储多种类型的数据类型。
WPARAM,LPARAM ,LRESULT和void *似乎都满足这个要求。



多态类是一个包含一个或多个虚函数的类。


它们确实不是'''任何类型的安全或类型多态,但它们是多态的。

在开始侮辱微软之前,你可能应该小心吗? (或者
指向你对多态数据类型的定义?)



微软应该受到侮辱。 Visual C ++根本不是C ++,它是C.

在那里打开并制作一个向导项目 - 你得到的只是C代码。

-JKop


http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...l=/library/en-
us/vccore98/HTML/_core_using_strict_type_checking.asp

Pay particular attention to:

The types WPARAM, LPARAM, LRESULT, and void * are ?polymorphic data
types.?
....when is Microsoft gonna cop-on?
-JKop

解决方案


"JKop" <NU**@NULL.NULL> wrote in message
news:tU*******************@news.indigo.ie...

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...l=/library/en-
us/vccore98/HTML/_core_using_strict_type_checking.asp

Pay particular attention to:

The types WPARAM, LPARAM, LRESULT, and void * are "polymorphic data
types."
...when is Microsoft gonna cop-on?
-JKop



I don''t think they referred to polymorphism from the OOP point of view. I
think that they meant that a type can have different meanings, depending on
how it is used. For example, WORD can be used as an integer value or as a
reference to an object. This can be somekind of (strange) polymorphism.

Catalin


JKop wrote:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...l=/library/en-
us/vccore98/HTML/_core_using_strict_type_checking.asp

Pay particular attention to:

The types WPARAM, LPARAM, LRESULT, and void * are ?polymorphic data
types.?
...when is Microsoft gonna cop-on?


A polymorphic data type is (I would say, and first few links on google
agree) is a data type which can be store more than one kind of type.
WPARAM, LPARAM, LRESULT and void* all seem to satisfy this requirement.

it is true that they aren''t any kind of safe or typed polymorphism, but
polymorphism they are.

Perhaps you should be careful before you start insulting microsoft? (or
point to your definition of polymorphic data type?)

Chris


A polymorphic data type is (I would say, and first few links on google
agree) is a data type which can be store more than one kind of type.
WPARAM, LPARAM, LRESULT and void* all seem to satisfy this requirement.

A polymorphic class is a class which contains one virtual function or more.

it is true that they aren''t any kind of safe or typed polymorphism, but
polymorphism they are.

Perhaps you should be careful before you start insulting microsoft? (or
point to your definition of polymorphic data type?)


Microsoft deserves to be insulted. "Visual C++" is not C++ at all, it''s C.
Open it up there and make a wizard project - all you get is C code.
-JKop


这篇关于不要不要笑的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆