SCO勒索 [英] SCO Extortion
问题描述
我目前是SCO的linux许可敲诈的目标之一
商业计划，我正在考虑转换为BSD之一的
避免任何潜在的问题。我很好奇哪些BSD人更喜欢大型数据库以及为什么这么做。关于我应该测试哪些指针？
谢谢，
加文
----- ----------------------（播出结束）----------------------- ----
提示3：如果通过Usenet发布/阅读，请发送适当的
subscribe-nomail命令给 ma ******* @ postgresql.org ，以便您的
消息可以干净地通过邮件列表
2004年1月20日星期二，Gavin M. Roy写道：
我是目前SCO的linux许可敲诈商业计划的目标之一，并考虑转换到BSD之一，以避免任何潜在的问题。我很好奇哪些BSD人更喜欢大型数据库以及为什么。关于我应该测试哪些指针？
最长时间，BSD被拆分为：
FreeBSD - i386坚如磐石
NetBSD - 在尽可能多的平台上工作
OpenBSD - 尽可能安全
那里他们之间有很多代码共享，所以，恕我直言，很多
这是个人喜好......自从'95以来我一直在使用FreeBSD，而
其他人则习惯于找到（并且通常会推动）其限制，
我对此非常满意...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org网络服务（ http：// www。 hub.org ）
电子邮件： sc ***** @ hub.org Yahoo！：yscrappy ICQ：7615664
---------------------------（end of广播）---------------------------
提示9：规划师如果您的
加入列的数据类型不匹配，将忽略您选择索引扫描的愿望
- 2004年1月20日星期二14:06:35 -0800Gavin M. Roy < gm*@ehpg.net>
写道：
我目前是SCO'linux授权勒索商业计划的目标之一，我正考虑转换到BSD之一，以避免任何潜在的问题。我很好奇哪些BSD人更喜欢大型数据库以及为什么。关于我应该测试哪些指针？
我喜欢FreeBSD。它的PORTS系统非常棒！
LER
谢谢，
Gavin
- --------------------------（广播结束）------------------- --------
提示3：如果通过Usenet发布/阅读，请发送适当的
subscribe-nomail命令到 ma ******* @ postgresql.org ，以便您的消息可以干净地通过邮件列表
-
Larry Rosenman http：// www .lerctr.org / ~ler
电话：+1 972-414-9812电子邮箱： le * @ lerctr.org
美国邮件：1905 Steamboat Springs Drive，Garland，TX 75044-6749
----- BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- ----
版本：GnuPG v1.2.4（FreeBSD）
iD8DBQFADdeSrRNGhTxJvdYRAl6KAJ95wxFBAhf8BWvBLVwAVo qo7Of1lwCcDYb0
31DXK 00uEuWR5IHWJKkfpEU =
= NejQ
-----结束PGP签名-----
< blockquote>感谢您的反馈。我还应该提到我使用freebsd
来获取其他东西，但我主要是询问人们的经验，这对于PostgreSQL来说是最好的生活方式。在一个不错的smp
高端scsi系统方面。很抱歉之前没有具体细节。
Gavin
Marc G. Fournier写道：
On 2004年1月20日星期二，Gavin M. Roy写道：
我目前是SCO的linux许可敲诈商业计划的目标之一，我是考虑转换到BSD之一，以避免任何潜在的问题。我很好奇哪些BSD人更喜欢大型数据库以及为什么。关于我应该测试哪些指针？
最长的时间，BSD被拆分为：
FreeBSD - i386摇滚坚固
NetBSD - 在尽可能多的平台上工作
OpenBSD - 尽可能安全
它们之间有很多代码共享，所以，恕我直言，很多
这是个人喜好......自从'95以来我一直在使用FreeBSD，而
除了习惯于找到（并且通常是推动）它的极限之外，我是对此感到非常满意......
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org网络服务（ http://www.hub.org ）
电子邮件： sc ***** @ hub.org Yahoo！：yscrappy ICQ：7615664
-------- -------------------（广播结束）-------------------------- -
提示4：不要杀死-9''邮政局长/>
I''m currently one of the targets of SCO''s linux licensing extortion
business plan, and am contemplating switching to one of the BSD''s to
avoid any potential problems. I''m curious which BSD people prefer for
large scale databases and why. Any pointers as to which I should test out?
Thanks,
Gavin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
I''m currently one of the targets of SCO''s linux licensing extortion
business plan, and am contemplating switching to one of the BSD''s to
avoid any potential problems. I''m curious which BSD people prefer for
large scale databases and why. Any pointers as to which I should test out?
for the longest time, the BSDs have been split as:
FreeBSD - i386 rock solid
NetBSD - work on as many platforms as possible
OpenBSD - be as secure as possible
There is alot of code sharing between them all though, so, IMHO, alot of
it is personal preferences ... I''ve been using FreeBSD since ''95, and
other then having a habit of finding (and, usually pushing) its limits,
I''ve been most happy with it ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: sc*****@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column''s datatypes do not match
--On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 14:06:35 -0800 "Gavin M. Roy" <gm*@ehpg.net>
wrote:
I''m currently one of the targets of SCO''s linux licensing extortion
business plan, and am contemplating switching to one of the BSD''s to
avoid any potential problems. I''m curious which BSD people prefer for
large scale databases and why. Any pointers as to which I should test
out? I like FreeBSD. It''s PORTS system is WONDERFUL!
LER
Thanks,
Gavin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: le*@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFADdeSrRNGhTxJvdYRAl6KAJ95wxFBAhf8BWvBLVwAVo qo7Of1lwCcDYb0
31DXK00uEuWR5IHWJKkfpEU=
=NejQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thanks for the feedback thus far. I should also mention I use freebsd
for other stuff, but I am mainly asking in peoples experience, which is
the best for PostgreSQL to live on specifically. In terms of a nice smp
high end scsi system. Sorry for the lack of specifics on that before.
Gavin
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
I''m currently one of the targets of SCO''s linux licensing extortion
business plan, and am contemplating switching to one of the BSD''s to
avoid any potential problems. I''m curious which BSD people prefer for
large scale databases and why. Any pointers as to which I should test out?
for the longest time, the BSDs have been split as:
FreeBSD - i386 rock solid
NetBSD - work on as many platforms as possible
OpenBSD - be as secure as possible
There is alot of code sharing between them all though, so, IMHO, alot of
it is personal preferences ... I''ve been using FreeBSD since ''95, and
other then having a habit of finding (and, usually pushing) its limits,
I''ve been most happy with it ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: sc*****@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don''t ''kill -9'' the postmaster
这篇关于SCO勒索的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
