C＃vs C ++ [英] C# vs C++

问题描述

C＃用户和C ++用户之间是否存在意见分歧？是否
C＃通常是C ++的替代品？我在C ++主题中问了这个问题和

大多数回复的人说C＃不是C ++的替代品。


C＃发起人有不同的看法？


-

Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com

解决方案

它不是替代品，但我会说很多项目肯定是

替代传统的C ++，在.NET IDE中使用

开发通常要快得多。


生成的可执行文件是没有原生C或C ++那么快（如果你知道

当然如何编写C / ++）但它是一种非常快速的语言来接收和运行

with因此它比C ++编码有许多优点。


-

问候


John Timney

ASP.NET MVP

微软区域总监


" Greg" < [e-mail]>在消息中写道

新闻：EC ********************************** @ microsof t.com ...

C＃用户和C ++用户之间是否存在意见分歧？
C＃是否通常是C ++的替代品？我在C ++主题中问过这个问题，大多数回复的人说C＃不是C ++的替代品。

C＃发起人有不同看法吗？
-
Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com

谢谢，是的，似乎C＃是RAD原型的一种优秀语言

迭代的东西，然后人们可以随时将其转换为C ++。

-

Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com

" John Timney（MVP）"写道：

它不是替代品但我会说很多项目它肯定是传统C ++的替代品，通常用
开发更快.NET IDE。

生成的可执行文件不如本机C或C ++快（如果你知道如何编写C / ++当然），但它是一种非常快速的语言选择并运行
，因此它比C ++编码有许多优点。

-
问候

John Timney
ASP .NET MVP
微软区域总监

Greg < [e-mail]>在消息中写道
新闻：EC ********************************** @ microsof t.com。 ..

C＃用户和C ++用户之间是否存在意见分歧？
C＃是否通常是C ++的替代品？我在C ++主题中问过这个问题，大多数回复的人说C＃不是C ++的替代品。

C＃发起人有不同看法吗？
-
Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com

>谢谢，是的，似乎C＃是RAD原型

迭代的一种很好的语言，然后人们可以将它转换为C ++。


如果要转换为MC ++，没有理由（MC ++使用MSIl和

C＃）。

如果它是转换为普通的旧C ++，祝你好运......你应该说：一个

可以永远花费Aeons将其转换为C ++

- -
Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com

" John Timney（MVP）"写道：

它不是替代品但我会说很多项目它肯定是传统C ++的替代品，通常开发速度更快
在.NET IDE中。

生成的可执行文件不如本机C或C ++快（如果你知道如何编写C / ++当然）但它是一种非常快速的语言，可以用来运行，因此它比C ++编码有很多优点。

-
关心
John Timney
ASP.NET MVP
微软区域总监

Greg < [e-mail]>在消息中写道
新闻：EC ********************************** @ microsof t.com。 ..

>对于C＃用户和C ++用户，是否存在意见分歧？
>是否
> C＃通常是C ++的替代品吗？我在C ++主题中问过这个问题
>和
>大多数回复的人说C＃不是
>的替代品。 C ++。
>
> C＃推广者有不同的看法吗？
>
> -
> Greg McPherran
> www.McPherran.com

Is there a difference of opinion between C# users and C++ users as to whether
C# is generally a replacement for C++? I asked this in the C++ thread and
most people people who responded say that C# is not a replacement for C++.

Do C# promoters have a different view?

--
Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com

解决方案

Its not an replacement but I would say for many projects its certainly an
alternative to traditional C++, and typically a lot faster to develop with
in the .NET IDE.

The resulting exeecutables are not as fast as native C or C++ (if you know
how to write C/++ of course) but its a very fast language to pick up and run
with, thus it has many advantages over coding in C++.

--
Regards

John Timney
ASP.NET MVP
Microsoft Regional Director

"Greg" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:EC**********************************@microsof t.com...

Is there a difference of opinion between C# users and C++ users as to
whether
C# is generally a replacement for C++? I asked this in the C++ thread and
most people people who responded say that C# is not a replacement for C++.

Do C# promoters have a different view?

--
Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com

Thank you, yes it seems like C# is a great language to RAD prototype
something iteratively and then one can always convert it to C++.
--
Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com
"John Timney ( MVP )" wrote:

Its not an replacement but I would say for many projects its certainly an
alternative to traditional C++, and typically a lot faster to develop with
in the .NET IDE.

The resulting exeecutables are not as fast as native C or C++ (if you know
how to write C/++ of course) but its a very fast language to pick up and run
with, thus it has many advantages over coding in C++.

--
Regards

John Timney
ASP.NET MVP
Microsoft Regional Director

"Greg" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:EC**********************************@microsof t.com...

Is there a difference of opinion between C# users and C++ users as to
whether
C# is generally a replacement for C++? I asked this in the C++ thread and
most people people who responded say that C# is not a replacement for C++.

Do C# promoters have a different view?

--
Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com

> Thank you, yes it seems like C# is a great language to RAD prototype

something iteratively and then one can always convert it to C++.
If it is to convert to MC++ there is no reason (MC++ use MSIl as much as
C#).
If it is to convert to plain old C++, good luck... you should say: "one
could always spend Aeons convert it to C++"
--
Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com
"John Timney ( MVP )" wrote:

Its not an replacement but I would say for many projects its certainly an
alternative to traditional C++, and typically a lot faster to develop
with
in the .NET IDE.

The resulting exeecutables are not as fast as native C or C++ (if you
know
how to write C/++ of course) but its a very fast language to pick up and
run
with, thus it has many advantages over coding in C++.

--
Regards

John Timney
ASP.NET MVP
Microsoft Regional Director

"Greg" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:EC**********************************@microsof t.com...

> Is there a difference of opinion between C# users and C++ users as to
> whether
> C# is generally a replacement for C++? I asked this in the C++ thread
> and
> most people people who responded say that C# is not a replacement for
> C++.
>
> Do C# promoters have a different view?
>
> --
> Greg McPherran
> www.McPherran.com

这篇关于C＃vs C ++的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！