ASP与ASP.NET [英] ASP vs ASP.NET

问题描述

完成新手问题！


为什么使用ASP而不是ASP.NET？


为什么使用ASP.NET而不是ASP？


我假设ASP.NET具有所有功能。 ASP加上一大堆

更多，是更新的更多未来证明，所以我更喜欢一些

我想要的工作是用ASP.NET编写的。为什么我所处理的公司更愿意坚持使用标准ASP？他们说ASP.NET

未经过验证，因此ASP更可靠。他们还表示，他们比ASP更有经验，但不是语言，而不是语言。

一样吗？我是一个完全新手，所以想要一些公正的评论

我是否应该坚持使用ASP.NET。


Richard

解决方案

>为什么我的公司

处理更喜欢坚持使用标准ASP？


- 学习曲线（不是ASP +）

- 与现有代码库的一致性

- 害怕改变

不是语言是一样的吗？

不！ ASP通常用VBScript或JScript编写。 ASP.Net通常是用VB.Net或C＃编写的
。


-
http://www.aspfaq.com/

（反向回复地址。）

" Richard Liddiment" <日***** @ cfp-software.co.uk>写在

新闻：cb ********** @ hercules.btinternet.com:

为什么使用ASP代替ASP.NET ？


因为它更容易编码（至少对我而言）

为什么使用ASP.NET而不是ASP？


因为它更强大

我假设ASP.NET具有所有功能 ASP加上更多，更新，更具未来性，所以会更喜欢我想要的一些工作是用ASP.NET编写的。为什么我要与之打交道的公司更愿意坚持使用标准ASP？


他们的开发者池可能主要是ASP，并且不舒服

使用.NET架构。

他们说过ASP.NET没有得到证实，所以ASP更可靠。
他们还说他们对ASP比ASP.NET更有经验，但不是语言。是相同的？


嗯，大多数情况下。它只是提供了一种虚假的安全感。一个很好的例子是Olde Englishe与现代英语 -

从技术上来说它们是相同的语言，但在实践和结构上

有一些关键的区别，有人说一个会有一个非常难以理解对方说话的人。

我是一个完整的新手，所以想对我是否有一些公正的评论
应该坚持使用ASP.NET。

嗯，这不是完全公正的，但我个人更喜欢ASP因为

我可以快速地输出一些代码，而不必为此付出代价。

ASP比你自己更简单。如果你在ASP中有一些东西工作，那么升级并不总是值得的。


ASP.NET提供了一个模仿通常事件驱动的整个基础架构<在Windows中编程
编程。您可以访问整个.NET库（例如

图纸），并且您拥有最常见任务的模块（例如表格

身份验证）。 IMO更难为新手（因为它隐藏了Web底层

原则，这既是优势/也是不利）。


语言不相同（ASP.NET使用C＃，Visual Basic 2003或任何其他

..基于.NET的语言）而不是JavaScript，VBScript ...


-


" Richard Liddiment" <日***** @ cfp-software.co.uk>一个écritdansle message de

news：cb ********** @ hercules.btinternet.com ...

完成新手问题！

为什么使用ASP而不是ASP.NET？

为什么使用ASP.NET代替ASP？

我假设ASP.NET已经全部使用特征 ASP加上整个
更多，更新，更具未来证据，所以我更希望我想要的一些工作是用ASP.NET编写的。为什么我要处理的公司更愿意坚持使用标准ASP？他们说
ASP.NET没有得到证实，所以ASP更可靠。他们还说他们
比ASP更有经验，但不是语言。
一样吗？我是一个完全新手，所以想对我是否应该坚持使用ASP.NET进行一些公正的评论。

Richard

Complete newbie questions!

Why use ASP instead of ASP.NET?

Why use ASP.NET instead of ASP?

I am assuming that ASP.NET has all of the "features" of ASP plus a whole lot
more, is more up to date and more future proof, so would prefer that some
work I want undertaken is written in ASP.NET. Why would a company I am
dealing with prefer to stick with standard ASP? They have said that ASP.NET
is not proven and so ASP is more reliable. They have also said that they are
more experienced with ASP than ASP.NET but wouldn''t the "language" be the
same? I am a complete novice to this so would like some impartial comments
on whether I should insist they use ASP.NET.

Richard

解决方案

> Why would a company I am

dealing with prefer to stick with standard ASP?
- learning curve (it is NOT ASP+)
- consistency with existing codebase
- fear of change
wouldn''t the "language" be the same?

NO! ASP is typically written in VBScript or JScript. ASP.Net is typically
written in VB.Net or C#.

--
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)

"Richard Liddiment" <Ri*****@cfp-software.co.uk> wrote in
news:cb**********@hercules.btinternet.com:

Why use ASP instead of ASP.NET?
Because it''s easier to code in (at least for me)
Why use ASP.NET instead of ASP?
Because it''s more robust
I am assuming that ASP.NET has all of the "features" of ASP plus a
whole lot more, is more up to date and more future proof, so would
prefer that some work I want undertaken is written in ASP.NET. Why
would a company I am dealing with prefer to stick with standard ASP?
Their developer pool is probably primarily ASP, and is not comfortable
with the .NET architecture.
They have said that ASP.NET is not proven and so ASP is more reliable.
They have also said that they are more experienced with ASP than
ASP.NET but wouldn''t the "language" be the same?
Um, mostly. It''s just similar enough to provide a false sense of
security. A good example would be Olde Englishe versus modern English -
technically they''re the same language, but in practice and structure
there are key differences, and somebody speaking one would have a very
hard time understanding somebody who spoke the other.
I am a complete
novice to this so would like some impartial comments on whether I
should insist they use ASP.NET.

Well, this isn''t exactly impartial, but I personally prefer ASP because
I can whip some code out pretty fast in it without having to struggle
over it.

ASP is simpler as you are on your own. If you have something in ASP that
work, an upgrade is not always worth.

ASP.NET provides a whole infrastructure that mimics the usual event driven
programming in Windows. You have access to the whole .NET library (such as
drawings) and you have modules for most common tasks (such as form
authentication). IMO harder for newbies (as it hides the Web underlying
principles which is both an advantage/disavantadge).

Languages are not identical (ASP.NET uses C#, Visual Basic 2003 or any other
..NET based language) instead of JavaScript, VBScript...

--

"Richard Liddiment" <Ri*****@cfp-software.co.uk> a écrit dans le message de
news:cb**********@hercules.btinternet.com...

Complete newbie questions!

Why use ASP instead of ASP.NET?

Why use ASP.NET instead of ASP?

I am assuming that ASP.NET has all of the "features" of ASP plus a whole lot more, is more up to date and more future proof, so would prefer that some
work I want undertaken is written in ASP.NET. Why would a company I am
dealing with prefer to stick with standard ASP? They have said that ASP.NET is not proven and so ASP is more reliable. They have also said that they are more experienced with ASP than ASP.NET but wouldn''t the "language" be the
same? I am a complete novice to this so would like some impartial comments
on whether I should insist they use ASP.NET.

Richard

这篇关于ASP与ASP.NET的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！