WAN上的数据库：ASP与终端服务器成本？ [英] DataBase over WAN: ASP vs. Terminal Server Costs?
问题描述
大家好，
我参与了一个项目，客户需要一个新的数据库（30个或更多地点）。
客户是一个服务精神紊乱的医疗保健组织。
他们目前使用Win2003服务器。所有客户端PC都是Win2000或Win XP。
此时有两种不同的方法/想法被考虑。
- 开发一个ASP-web应用程序。 （不是我）
- 开发Access97-TerminalServer应用程序。 （由我）
在决策过程中，开发，许可和维护成本非常重要。
直到这一刻我从未去过''ASP-Route''，所以ASP不是一个选项（对我而言）。
如果他们要我做这个工作，我会提出A97-TS方法。
我可以提供Access97运行时（我拥有ODE）所以没有问题。
（Access运行时会出现一些安装问题，但是我我认为我可以处理这个问题。
我在这里读到TS在万物情景中会很好用。
但是我不知道TS许可费用。
谢谢，
Arno R
Hi all,
I am involved in a project where a client needs a new database over a wan (30 or more locations).
The client is a health-care organisation that ''services'' mentally disordered people.
They use Win2003 Server at the moment. All the client PC''s are Win2000 or Win XP.
At this moment there are two different approaches/ideas considered.
-- to develop an ASP-web application. (not by me)
-- to develop an Access97-TerminalServer application. (by me)
The developing, licencing and the maintenance-costs are very important in the decision-making-process.
Until this moment I never went the ''ASP-Route'', so ASP is not an option (for me).
If they want me to do the job I will propose the A97-TS approach.
I can deliver the Access97 runtime (I own the ODE) so there is no problem with that.
(There will be some installation-issues with the Access runtime but I think I can handle that)
I read in this ng that TS would be a good approach in a wan-scenario.
However I have NO idea of the TS-licensing costs.
Thanks,
Arno R
推荐答案
Arno R写道：
大家好，
我参与了一个项目，客户需要一个新的数据库，位于
wan（30个或更多位置）。客户是一个医疗机构，服务精神上无序的人。
他们目前使用Win2003服务器。所有的客户端PC都是Win2000或Win XP。
目前有两种不同的方法/想法。
- 开发ASP-web应用程序。 （不是我）
- 开发Access97-TerminalServer应用程序。 （由我）
在决策过程中，开发，许可和维护成本非常重要。
直到这一刻我从来没有去过''ASP -Route''，所以ASP不是
选项（对我而言）。
如果他们要我做这个工作，我会提出A97-TS方法。
我可以提供Access97运行时（我拥有ODE）因此没有问题。
（Access运行时会出现一些安装问题，但我认为我可以处理它）
我在这里读到TS在万物情景中是一个很好的方法。
然而我不知道TS许可成本。
Hi all,
I am involved in a project where a client needs a new database over a
wan (30 or more locations).
The client is a health-care organisation that ''services'' mentally
disordered people.
They use Win2003 Server at the moment. All the client PC''s are
Win2000 or Win XP.
At this moment there are two different approaches/ideas considered.
-- to develop an ASP-web application. (not by me)
-- to develop an Access97-TerminalServer application. (by me)
The developing, licencing and the maintenance-costs are very
important in the decision-making-process.
Until this moment I never went the ''ASP-Route'', so ASP is not an
option (for me).
If they want me to do the job I will propose the A97-TS approach.
I can deliver the Access97 runtime (I own the ODE) so there is no
problem with that.
(There will be some installation-issues with the Access runtime but I
think I can handle that)
I read in this ng that TS would be a good approach in a wan-scenario.
However I have NO idea of the TS-licensing costs.
终端服务器许可是复杂的，所以最终你应该深入研究微软关于此的文章，但我可以告诉你每个用户连接。要终端服务器需要许可证才能这样做，除非你为你的服务器购买了每个处理器的那种
许可证。而不是每个连接。
前者虽然简单的声音是更昂贵的目标在网站
，需要数百或数千用户（不是你的情况）。
如果进行连接的
用户使用NT 4.0或更高版本的操作系统，旧版本的Windows Server Edition会授予一个连接许可证。
使用较新版本的Windows Server已不再适用。
连接后，他们还需要为其运行的任何应用程序提供许可证。如果您使用Access Runtime在服务器上安装
Access应用程序，那么您就可以了。
那里。如果您使用完全访问权限，则每个连接用户必须持有Access
许可证。如果使用运行时注意事项，比如使用Outlook发送
消息或合并到Word。这些功能要求远程
用户拥有这些软件的许可。
底线是TS解决方案可以帮助你提高运行效率更快，
将允许您保留现在拥有的丰富Access界面，但它不是免费午餐。
-
我没有查看此邮件附带的电子邮件帐户
。发送给... ...
在Hunter dot com的RBrandt
Terminal Server licensing is complex so ultimately you should dig through
Microsoft''s articles on this, but I can tell you that each user "connecting" to
the Terminal Server needs a license to do so unless you purchase the kind of
license for your server that is "per processor" rather than "per connection".
The former while simpler sounding is a lot more expensive targetted at sites
that want hundreds or thousands of users (not your situation).
Older versions of Windows Server Edition granted one connection license if the
user doing the connecting was using NT 4.0 or higher of an operating system.
With the newer versions of Windows Server that is no longer the case.
Once connected they also need licenses for any apps they run. If you install
the Access app on the server using the Access Runtime then you are off the hook
there. If you use full Access then every connecting user must hold an Access
license. If using the Runtime watch out for things like using Outlook to send
messages or doing merges to Word. Those features would require that the remote
user have license to those pieces of software.
Bottom line is the TS solution would get you up and running a lot faster and
will allow you to retain the rich Access interface that you have now, but it is
not a free lunch.
--
I don''t check the Email account attached
to this message. Send instead to...
RBrandt at Hunter dot com
" Arno R" < AR *********** @ tiscali.nl>写在
news：43 ******************** @ dreader2.news.tiscali。 nl：
"Arno R" <ar***********@tiscali.nl> wrote in
news:43********************@dreader2.news.tiscali. nl:
我在这里读到TS将是一个很好的方法。但是我不知道TS许可成本。
I read in this ng that TS would be a good approach in a
wan-scenario. However I have NO idea of the TS-licensing costs.
Rick部分回答了这个问题，指出有许可证b / b
问题。但这些成本很小 -
Rick partly answered this, pointing out that there are licensing
issues. But those costs are small --
40左右。我知道TS许可证的
教育价格更像是
40 or so. I know that the
educational price for TS licenses is more like
这篇关于WAN上的数据库：ASP与终端服务器成本？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
