高级代码总是专门的，通常充满了无法修复的错误。 [英] Higer level code is always specialized and often full of unfixable bugs.

问题描述

您好Olaf_Baeyens（和Linonut），

Microsoft C ++真的是MS_C的最新版本，

因为微软不支持最新的C标准，C99。


cout和STL是纯垃圾，不应该使用，我说。

全部同样，我使用C ++（MS_C_7）

，因为它允许在语句中声明变量。


我也使用C ++的&很多，因为引用看起来比指针更清晰。


C已经存在了很长时间，

并且在C＃和Java之后将会持续很长时间忘了。


语言越高，

例如MS_Word中的VBA脚本，它的生命周期越短。


高级语言如C＃和Java

的问题在于它们永远无法达到状态作为一个真正的标准，

，因为很少有人能够同意更高级别的东西应该是什么样的。


高级代码总是专业的，经常充满不可修复的错误。


PS经验丰富的C编码人员只需创建一个按钮就不需要几周。

Hi Olaf_Baeyens ( and Linonut ),

Microsoft C++ is really it''s latest version of MS_C,
as Microsoft is not supporting the latest C standard, C99.

cout and the STL are pure garbage and should not be used, I say.
All the same, I use C++ ( MS_C_7 )
as it allows be to declare variables in_between statements.

I also use C++''s & a lot as references look cleaner than pointers.

C has been around for a long time,
and will continue to be around long after C# and Java are forgotten.

The higer a language is,
e.g. VBA scripts in MS_Word, the shorter it''s lifespan.

The problem with high_level languages like C# and Java
is that they never quite reach the status of being a genuine standard,
as few can agree on what the higher level stuff should look like.

Higer level code is always specialized and often full of unfixable bugs.

P.S. Experienced C coders don''t require weeks just to create a button.

推荐答案

Jeff_Relf写道：

Jeff_Relf wrote:

嗨Olaf_Baeyens（和Linonut），

Microsoft C ++实际上是MS_C的最新版本，因为Microsoft不支持最新的C标准C99。


首先，你们都喜欢低级别的东西，然后你订阅了一个像c ++这样的垃圾语言

>
c就是答案，它总是如此。


c / unix / linux是全世界的通用语言。


所有变体都是面对公司漂亮男孩的糊状面团语言

在建筑会议中围绕UML图表进行操作。


cout和STL是纯垃圾，不应该使用，我说。
同样，我使用C ++（MS_C_7）
因为它允许在语句中声明变量。

我也使用C ++的&很多，因为引用看起来比指针更清晰。

C已经存在了很长时间，并且在C＃和Java被遗忘之后很长时间都会存在。

语言越高，例如MS_Word中的VBA脚本，它的生命周期越短。

高级语言如C＃和Java
的问题在于它们永远不会达到成为真正标准的状态，
高级代码总是专门的，并且经常充满了无法修复的错误。

PS经验丰富的C编码人员只需创建一个按钮就不需要几周。

Hi Olaf_Baeyens ( and Linonut ),

Microsoft C++ is really it''s latest version of MS_C,
as Microsoft is not supporting the latest C standard, C99.
First you''re all like low-level and stuff, and then you subscribe to a
garbage language like c++

c is the answer and it always will be.

c/unix/linux is the lingua franca of the whole world.

all variants as pasty-faced dough languages for corporate pretty boys
who tote around UML diagrams in "architectural meetings".


cout and the STL are pure garbage and should not be used, I say.
All the same, I use C++ ( MS_C_7 )
as it allows be to declare variables in_between statements.

I also use C++''s & a lot as references look cleaner than pointers.

C has been around for a long time,
and will continue to be around long after C# and Java are forgotten.

The higer a language is,
e.g. VBA scripts in MS_Word, the shorter it''s lifespan.

The problem with high_level languages like C# and Java
is that they never quite reach the status of being a genuine standard,
as few can agree on what the higher level stuff should look like.

Higer level code is always specialized and often full of unfixable bugs.

P.S. Experienced C coders don''t require weeks just to create a button.

Hi Chinese_Pope，Ya writ：< < C是答案，它始终是。 >>


根据微软的说法，最近的版本是C ++，
，因为他们没有使用C99路线。


C ++与C一样低，因为cout和STL是可选的。

Hi Chinese_Pope, Ya writ: << C is the answer and it always will be. >>

And the most recent version of that, according to Microsoft, is C++,
because they''re not going the C99 route.

C++ is just as low as C, because cout and the STL are optional.

>附：经验丰富的C编码人员只需创建一个按钮就不需要几个星期。

> P.S. Experienced C coders don''t require weeks just to create a button.

我听起来有点戏剧性。 :-)

我没有提到按钮本身，而是关于应该与用户界面互操作的

按钮背后的代码。

例如积极反馈，如状态栏，进度条，....


---
http://www.skyscan.be

这篇关于高级代码总是专门的，通常充满了无法修复的错误。的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！