询问subprocess.Popen类的名称 [英] Inquiry regarding the name of subprocess.Popen class
问题描述
您好。我想知道是否有人知道在子进程模块中命名
Popen类的原理。对于创建子进程的函数，Popen听起来像是一个合适的
名称，但是对象本身是一个子进程，而不是popen。似乎只需命名类Subprocess就可以更准确了，有人可以解释为什么这不是
的情况吗？
谢谢。
Hi. I wondered if anyone knew the rationale behind the naming of the
Popen class in the subprocess module. Popen sounds like the a suitable
name for a function that created a subprocess, but the object itself is
a subprocess, not a "popen". It seems that it would be more accurate to
just name the class Subprocess, can anyone explain why this is not the
case?
Thank you.
推荐答案
En Mon，2008年9月1日04:23:38 -0300，Jeremy Banks< je ****@jeremybanks.caescribió：
En Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:23:38 -0300, Jeremy Banks <je****@jeremybanks.caescribió:
嗨。我想知道是否有人知道在子进程模块中命名
Popen类的原理。对于创建子进程的函数，Popen听起来像是一个合适的
名称，但是对象本身是一个子进程，而不是popen。似乎只需命名类Subprocess就可以更准确了，有人可以解释为什么这不是
的情况吗？
Hi. I wondered if anyone knew the rationale behind the naming of the
Popen class in the subprocess module. Popen sounds like the a suitable
name for a function that created a subprocess, but the object itself is
a subprocess, not a "popen". It seems that it would be more accurate to
just name the class Subprocess, can anyone explain why this is not the
case?
我不知道 - 但我同意，Subprocess本来就是一个更好的名字。
-
Gabriel Genellina
I have no idea - but I agree, Subprocess would have been a better name.
--
Gabriel Genellina
En Mon，2008年9月1日04:23:38 -0300，Jeremy Banks< je **** @ jeremybanks.caescribió：
En Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:23:38 -0300, Jeremy Banks <je****@jeremybanks.caescribió:
嗨。我想知道是否有人知道在子进程模块中命名
Popen类的原理。对于创建子进程的函数，Popen听起来像是一个合适的
名称，但是对象本身是一个子进程，而不是popen。似乎只需命名类Subprocess就可以更准确了，有人可以解释为什么这不是
的情况吗？
Hi. I wondered if anyone knew the rationale behind the naming of the
Popen class in the subprocess module. Popen sounds like the a suitable
name for a function that created a subprocess, but the object itself is
a subprocess, not a "popen". It seems that it would be more accurate to
just name the class Subprocess, can anyone explain why this is not the
case?
我不知道 - 但我同意，Subprocess本来就是一个更好的名字。
-
Gabriel Genellina
I have no idea - but I agree, Subprocess would have been a better name.
--
Gabriel Genellina
9月1日上午9:23，Jeremy Banks< jer ... @ jeremybanks.cawrote：
On Sep 1, 9:23 am, Jeremy Banks <jer...@jeremybanks.cawrote:
嗨。我想知道是否有人知道在子进程模块中命名
Popen类的原理。对于创建子进程的函数，Popen听起来像是一个合适的
名称，但是对象本身是一个子进程，而不是popen。似乎只需命名类Subprocess就可以更准确了，有人可以解释为什么这不是
的情况吗？
Hi. I wondered if anyone knew the rationale behind the naming of the
Popen class in the subprocess module. Popen sounds like the a suitable
name for a function that created a subprocess, but the object itself is
a subprocess, not a "popen". It seems that it would be more accurate to
just name the class Subprocess, can anyone explain why this is not the
case?
Python类是标准Posix函数的推广，
（几乎）同名： http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/0079...xsh/popen.html
干杯，
Nicola Musatti
The Python class is a generalization of the standard Posix function of
(almost) the same name: http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/0079...xsh/popen.html
Cheers,
Nicola Musatti
这篇关于询问subprocess.Popen类的名称的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
