网站设计理念：.html和.html。 PDF格式 [英] Web site design philosophy: .html and . pdf
问题描述
虽然我已经设计并实施了许多合理的，价值不菲的b $ b受欢迎的网站，但我认为自己并不是图形设计师。
我现在是第一次与图形设计师合作。我注意到，在设计草案中，想法将是许多''页''
实际上是pdf文件。我想我稍微夸大了一下，但
网站可能会成为一系列内容的页面，包括链接
到pdf文件，用于下载和阅读Acrobat
读者。
我倾向于认为这种方法与我认为是b $ b的基本思想相冲突最初设计的万维网，即使用超文本/超链接来更深入地了解主题或离开其他链接网站
寻求另一个关于某个主题的知识途径。
我的设计师朋友说使用pdf保持
很好文件'的原始设计经过时间和精力花在了
首先设计它。将所提供文档的每个页面重新创建为html需要花费更多的时间，其中的页面具有比pdf文件更少的视觉效果。内容的安全性 - 少得多
人们将能够从文档中窃取文本。宽带使用：慢速
拨号正在消亡，因此下载速度也较慢。
我很想听听有关pdf v.html方法的任何意见，这可能有助于澄清我对此问题的看法， />
祝福，John Morgan
2005年5月24日星期二20:11:28 GMT，John摩根< jf*@XXwoodlander.co.uk>写道：
我很想听听有关pdf诉.html网站设计方法的任何意见，这可能有助于澄清我对此事的看法，
万维网的设计包括目标视觉显示，还有许多其他渲染内容的方式（想想语音和听觉浏览器，盲文，
纯文本浏览器，Googlebot :-)）我认为好的设计针对
质量进行了优化，但并不排除任何例外情况。
使用普通的HTML可以为所有人提供内容。人们可以使用CSS来创建一个美丽的设计（当然是流畅的），具有视觉吸引力并且可以随时访问
并且可用于没有必要或用于视觉吸引力的访客设计。
PDF迎合了大众。不利的一面是，使用pdf排除了许多用户和
仍在拨号上的人（这是一个很大的
人，特别是如果你在国际上思考。
我认为任何认为他/她需要pdf来保持设计的设计师都没有正确理解www是或做得不好或
两个。
-
， - - < - @ - PretLetters：''woest wyf''，遇见vele interesses：----------。
|博客| http://home.wanadoo.nl/b。 de.zoete / _private / weblog.html |
| webontwerp | http://home.wanadoo.nl/b。 de.zoete / html / webontwerp.html |
| zweefvliegen | http://home.wanadoo.nl/b。 de.zoete / html / vliegen.html |
` --------------------------- ----------------------- - < - @ ------------''
Barbara de Zoete写道：
使用pdf排除了许多仍在拨号上的用户和生气
它会让那些没有拨号的人感到烦恼。问题包括：
*必须生成另一个软件来查看文档。
*没有文本流来适应窗口。
*必须向上和向下滚动，向上和向下滚动...对于带有列的
文档。
* PDF查看器简单渲染文档比web浏览器慢。
*不打算使用 http://amb.vis.ne.jp/mozilla/scrapbook/
*许多PDF文档的复制/粘贴难度
列表无穷无尽。
-
David Dorward< http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> < http://dorward.me.uk/>
首页是〜/ .bashrc的位置
John Morgan
我很想听听有关pdf诉.html网站设计方法的任何意见，这可能有助于澄清我的想法在这件事上，
你的朋友在他的幽冥地区说话。
在你的职业危险中接受他的建议。
他描述方式的唯一理由是：
1）懒惰
2）傲慢
3）无知
Though I have designed and implemented a number of large reasonably
well received web sites I do not consider myself a graphics designer
I am now for the first time going to work with a graphics designer. I
notice that in the draft design the idea will be that many ''pages''
will in fact be pdf files. I suppose I exaggerate slightly but the
site could turn out to be a series of ''contents''pages comprising links
to pdf files which are for downloading and reading with Acrobat
Reader.
I am inclined to the view that this approach conflicts with what I
have regarded as the fundamental idea of the World Wide Web as
originally designed, namely the use of hypertext/hyperlinks to get
deeper and deeper into a topic or to depart to some other linked site
to pursue another avenue of knowledge on a topic.
My designer friend says that it is good by using pdf to keep a
document''s original design after time and effort has been spent on
designing it in the first place. It takes a lot more time to re-create
every page of a supplied document into html with the pages having less
visual impact than with a pdf file. Security of content - a lot less
people will be able to steal text from documents.. Broadband use: slow
dial up is dying and therefore so are slower downloads.
I would be interested to hear any views on the pdf v. html approach to
web site design which might help clarify my thoughts on this matter,
Best wishes, John Morgan
On Tue, 24 May 2005 20:11:28 GMT, John Morgan <jf*@XXwoodlander.co.uk> wrote:
I would be interested to hear any views on the pdf v. html approach to
web site design which might help clarify my thoughts on this matter,
Design for the world wide web includes targetting visual display, but also many
other ways of rendering the content (think speech and aural browsers, braille,
plain text browsers, Googlebot :-) ) I think a good design is optimized for the
masses, but doesn''t exclude any of the exceptions.
With plain html one can serve the content to all. One can use CSS to create a
beautiful desing (fluid of course) to be visually attractive and keep accessible
and usable for visitors who have no need or use for visually attractive designs.
PDF caters the masses. The down side is that using pdf excluded many users and
pisses of those who are still on dial-up (and that is a significant amount of
people, especially if you think internationally).
I think that any designer who thinks s/he needs pdf to keep the design as
designed, has no proper understanding of what the www is or does a bad job or
both.
--
,-- --<--@ -- PretLetters: ''woest wyf'', met vele interesses: ----------.
| weblog | http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/_private/weblog.html |
| webontwerp | http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/webontwerp.html |
|zweefvliegen | http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/vliegen.html |
`-------------------------------------------------- --<--@ ------------''
Barbara de Zoete wrote:
using pdf excluded many users and pisses of those who are still on dial-up
It annoys people who aren''t on dial up too. Problems include:
* Having to spawn another piece of software to view a document.
* Not having text flow to fit the window.
* Having to scroll up and down and up and down and up and ... in the case of
documents with columns.
* PDF viewers being simply slower to render documents then web browsers.
* Not being about to use http://amb.vis.ne.jp/mozilla/scrapbook/
* The difficulty in copy/pasting from many PDF documents
The list is endless.
--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is
"John Morgan"
I would be interested to hear any views on the pdf v. html approach to
web site design which might help clarify my thoughts on this matter,
Your friend is talking out of his nether regions.
Take his advice at your professional peril.
The only reasons to go the way he is describing are:
1) Laziness
2) Arrogance
3) Ignorance
这篇关于网站设计理念：.html和.html。 PDF格式的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
