常见问题更新9.85日期2007-08-31 [英] FAQ Update 9.85 Dated 2007-08-31
问题描述
常见问题更新9.85日期2007-08-31：
第3.1节改为：
目前c.l.j认可的唯一一本书。常客是：
javascript ：权威指南，第5版作者David Flanagan
ISBN：0-596-10199-6
另外，David Flanagan：JavaScript Pocket Reference，第2版。 ISBN
0-596-00411-7仅供语言和API参考。
勘误表应该被认为是必读的书。
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5 /
勘误表：
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5/errata/
David Flanagan的博客网站：
http://www.davidflanagan.com/
第4.22节重新编号和MSDN URL已更改。
-
Randy
comp.lang.javascript常见问题 - http://jibbering.com/faq/index.html
常见问题解答： http：//www.j ibbering.com/faq/faq_notes/faq_notes.html
ECMAScript语言规范来自FAQ2.6
FAQEditor写道：
常见问题更新9.85日期2007-08-31：
第3.1节改为：
目前唯一被clj认可的书常客是：
javascript ：权威指南，第5版作者David
Flanagan ISBN：0-596-10199-6
这在技术上仍然不正确，因为没有这样的
代言（从第4版的角度来看）明确
由少数常客认可。尽管如此，我还是愿意用目前的措辞来表达，如果只是为了阻止毫无意义的b / b
的狡猾。第5版似乎并不比第4版差，所以我认为那些支持第4版的人愿意支持第5版的b $ b。
我想我们再一次遭受了那些已经熟悉javascript，网页浏览器和DOM的明显事实
没有动机并阅读有关该主题的参考作品（并且
书的作者没有动机支付此类人员进行评论
他们的书籍，因为结果可能会非常关键。
另外，David Flanagan：JavaScript Pocket Reference，2nd Edition。
ISBN 0 -596-00411-7仅供语言和API参考。
勘误表应该被视为必读书籍。
虽然指出有一个勘误是一个好主意我认为如果事实可以更好地表达，那么
会很好勘误表只会包含作者愿意识别的更正。对于
的例子，本书细分为''核心''和''客户端''
javascript，在前几个版本中是合理的，不合时宜的
第4次和第5次的正面错误，在勘误表中不大可能是b校正。并且书中使用的误解和
模糊不清的术语，或者使用 - navigator.userAgent的
都没有。
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5 /
勘误表：
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5/errata/
David Flanagan的博客网站：
http://www.davidflanagan.com/
我不是认为David Flanagan的博客值得一提。
Richard。
9月1日，上午11:49，Richard Cornford < Rich ... @ litotes.demon.co.uk>
写道：
FAQEditor写道：
常见问题更新9.85日期2007-08-31：
第3.1节改为：
目前由clj认可的唯一一本书常客是：
javascript ：权威指南，第5版作者David
Flanagan ISBN ：0-596-10199-6
< snip>
我认为我们再一次遭受这样一个显而易见的事实：那些已经熟悉javascript，网页浏览器和DOM的人已经没有动机去阅读参考作品了关于这个问题（以及
书的作者没有动机支付这些人做评论
他们的书，因为结果可能非常关键） 。
如本主题所述： http://groups.google.com/group/comp....87efe0fe05543c
javascript ：TDG（第5版）由Douglas Crockford，Norris审查
Boyd，Peter-Paul Koch，Christian Heilmann，Ken Cooper，Todd
Ditchendorf， Geoff Stearns和Sanders Kleinfeld。
以前版本的评论者包括Brendan Eich和Waldemar Horwat。
-David
blockquote>
< blockquote> Richard Cornford在2007年9月1日下午2:49发表以下内容：
FAQEditor写道：
< snip>
> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5/
勘误表：
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5/errata/
大卫Flanagan的博客网站：
http://www.davidflanagan.com/
我不认为David Flanagan的博客值得一提。
博客网站已从我的本地副本中删除。
-
Randy
comp.lang.javascript常见问题 - http：// jibbering .com / faq / index.html
常见问题解答备注： http://www.jibbering.com/faq/faq_notes/faq_notes.html
ECMAScript语言规范来自FAQ2.6
FAQ Update 9.85 Dated 2007-08-31:
Section 3.1 changed to read:
The only book currently endorsed by c.l.j. regulars is:
javascript: The Definitive Guide, 5th Edition By David Flanagan
ISBN:0-596-10199-6
Also by David Flanagan: JavaScript Pocket Reference, 2nd Edition. ISBN
0-596-00411-7 for language and API reference alone.
The errata should be considered a must read along with the book.
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5/
Errata:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5/errata/
David Flanagan''s Blog Site:
http://www.davidflanagan.com/
Section 4.22 reworded and the MSDN URL changed.
--
Randy
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq/index.html
FAQ Notes: http://www.jibbering.com/faq/faq_notes/faq_notes.html
ECMAScript Language Specification via FAQ2.6
FAQEditor wrote:FAQ Update 9.85 Dated 2007-08-31:
Section 3.1 changed to read:
The only book currently endorsed by c.l.j. regulars is:
javascript: The Definitive Guide, 5th Edition By David
Flanagan ISBN:0-596-10199-6That still isn''t technically true, as there have been no such
endorsements (in the sense in which the 4th edition was explicitly
endorsed by at leas a handful of regulars). Still, I would be willing to
go with that wording at present, if only to put a stop to the pointless
quibbling. The 5th edition does not seem to be worse than the 4th so I
think that those who did endorse the 4th would be as willing to endorse
the 5th.
I think we are, once again, suffering from the obvious fact that those
who are already familiar with javascript, web browsers and the DOM are
not motivated to by and read reference works on the subject (and the
book''s authors are not motivated to pay such individuals to do reviews
of their books, as the results will likely be heavily critical).
Also by David Flanagan: JavaScript Pocket Reference, 2nd Edition.
ISBN 0-596-00411-7 for language and API reference alone.
The errata should be considered a must read along with the book.While pointing out that there is an errata is a good idea I think it
would be good if the fact could better express that the errata will only
contain corrections that the author is willing to recognise. For
example, the subdivision of the book into ''core'' and ''client side''
javascript, justified in the first couple of editions, an anachronism by
the 4th and a positive mistake in the 5th, is unlikely to ever be
''corrected'' in an errata. And neither is much of the misleading and
ambiguous terminology employed in the book, or the inadequate discussion
of the use of - navigator.userAgent.
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5/
Errata:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5/errata/
David Flanagan''s Blog Site:
http://www.davidflanagan.com/I don''t think that David Flanagan''s blog deserves a mention at all.
Richard.
On Sep 1, 11:49 am, "Richard Cornford" <Rich...@litotes.demon.co.uk>
wrote:FAQEditor wrote:FAQ Update 9.85 Dated 2007-08-31:
Section 3.1 changed to read:
The only book currently endorsed by c.l.j. regulars is:
javascript: The Definitive Guide, 5th Edition By David
Flanagan ISBN:0-596-10199-6
<snip>
I think we are, once again, suffering from the obvious fact that those
who are already familiar with javascript, web browsers and the DOM are
not motivated to by and read reference works on the subject (and the
book''s authors are not motivated to pay such individuals to do reviews
of their books, as the results will likely be heavily critical).As noted in this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/comp....87efe0fe05543c
javascript: TDG (5th ed.) was reviewed by Douglas Crockford, Norris
Boyd, Peter-Paul Koch, Christian Heilmann, Ken Cooper, Todd
Ditchendorf, Geoff Stearns, and Sanders Kleinfeld. Reviewers of
previous editions include Brendan Eich and Waldemar Horwat.
-David
Richard Cornford said the following on 9/1/2007 2:49 PM:FAQEditor wrote:<snip>
>http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5/
Errata:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/jscript5/errata/
David Flanagan''s Blog Site:
http://www.davidflanagan.com/
I don''t think that David Flanagan''s blog deserves a mention at all.The blog site has been removed from my local copy.
--
Randy
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq/index.html
FAQ Notes: http://www.jibbering.com/faq/faq_notes/faq_notes.html
ECMAScript Language Specification via FAQ2.6
这篇关于常见问题更新9.85日期2007-08-31的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
