死亡语言 [英] C a Dead Language
问题描述
C曾经允许这个功能作为一个组合。现在ANSI
和其他人开发出一种在犯罪虚假中茁壮成长的变种。
while循环中的if语句必须起作用。或者你已经改变了
如果逻辑。
在所有用法中声称if是抽象的是一个主要的谬误。一个
允许使用某些用法，因此谬误做了一些事情。
现在Visual 6.0 enforece谓词测试了天才理论。
为什么在目标是编译器时测试思考？
这是出于HAND。我只是直接看看DC，看看是否允许逻辑
.
谓词理论只是一个逻辑理论，它不是
ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL理论。
限制理论是结果。因此，DED就是DEAD。
4月27日下午2:26，Douglas Eagleson< eaglesondoug ... @ yahoo .com>
写道：
C用于允许该功能作为精通程序集..现在ANSI
和其他人开发了一种在犯罪虚假中茁壮成长的变体。
while循环中的if语句必须起作用。或者你已经改变了
如果逻辑。
在所有用法中声称if是抽象的是一个主要的谬误。一个
允许使用某些用法，因此谬误做了一些事情。
现在Visual 6.0 enforece谓词测试了天才理论。
为什么在目标是编译器时测试思考？
这是出于HAND。我只是直接看看DC，看看是否允许逻辑
.
谓词理论只是一个逻辑理论，它不是
ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL理论。
限制理论是结果。因此，DE和C是DEAD。
无论谁与编译器一起玩这些逻辑游戏，都可以获得价值。
crimianl充斥恶作剧。
当城堡落下时，逻辑BASIC程序将为核武器提供动力。
星期五，2007年4月27日11:26:16 -0700，Douglas Eagleson写道：
[文盲漫无目的。]
我看到你不限制你的文盲和不相关的
发布到sci.math和sci.physics。请放心，我们非常了解你在这个群体中的无知和愚蠢。
Douglas Eagleson写道：
< blockquote class =post_quotes>
>
C用于允许该功能作为精通程序集。现在
ANSI和其他人开发了一个变体在犯罪分子上茁壮成长
虚假。
while循环中的if语句必须起作用。或者你已经改变了
if逻辑。
在所有用法中声称if为抽象是一个主要的谬误。一个
允许使用某些用法，因此谬误做了一些事情。
现在Visual 6.0 enforece谓词测试了天才理论。
为什么在目标是编译器时测试思考？
这是出于HAND。我将直接看看DC，看看是否允许逻辑
。
谓词理论只是一个逻辑理论，它不是
ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL理论。
限制理论是结果。因此，DE和C是DEAD。
如果你是巨魔，或者无法写作
清楚的英语，我还不知道。时间会告诉我们。
-
< http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt> ;
< http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423>
< http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html> ;
< http://kadaitcha.cx/vista/dogsbreakfast/index.html>
cbfalconer at maineline dot net
-
通过 http://www.teranews.com上的免费Usenet帐户发布
C used to allow the function as th elogical assembly.. And now ANSI
and others have develope a variant that thrives on criminal falsehood.
An if statement in a while loop must function. or you have changed the
if logic.
It is a major fallacy to claim the if as abstract in all usage. A
certain usage used ot be allowed so the fallacy did something neet.
Now the Visual 6.0 enforece predicate test the geniuses theory.
Why test thinking when the goal was a compiler?
This is out of HAND. I am gonna just nuke DC and see if the logic was
allowed.
Predicate theory is just a logical theory, it is not
ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL theory.
To restrict theory is the outcome. ANd C is therefor DEAD.
On Apr 27, 2:26 pm, Douglas Eagleson <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:C used to allow the function as th elogical assembly.. And now ANSI
and others have develope a variant that thrives on criminal falsehood.
An if statement in a while loop must function. or you have changed the
if logic.
It is a major fallacy to claim the if as abstract in all usage. A
certain usage used ot be allowed so the fallacy did something neet.
Now the Visual 6.0 enforece predicate test the geniuses theory.
Why test thinking when the goal was a compiler?
This is out of HAND. I am gonna just nuke DC and see if the logic was
allowed.
Predicate theory is just a logical theory, it is not
ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL theory.
To restrict theory is the outcome. ANd C is therefor DEAD.Whoever plays these logical games with compilers is gui8lty of
crimianl charge of malicousness.
When the castles fall the logical BASIC routine will power the nuke.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:26:16 -0700, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
[Illiterate rambling.]I see that you do not restrict your illiterate and irrelevant
postings to sci.math and sci.physics. Rest assured that we are well aware
of your ignorance and stupidity in this group as well.
Douglas Eagleson wrote:>
C used to allow the function as th elogical assembly.. And now
ANSI and others have develope a variant that thrives on criminal
falsehood.
An if statement in a while loop must function. or you have changed
the if logic.
It is a major fallacy to claim the if as abstract in all usage. A
certain usage used ot be allowed so the fallacy did something neet.
Now the Visual 6.0 enforece predicate test the geniuses theory.
Why test thinking when the goal was a compiler?
This is out of HAND. I am gonna just nuke DC and see if the logic
was allowed.
Predicate theory is just a logical theory, it is not
ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL theory.
To restrict theory is the outcome. ANd C is therefor DEAD.I don''t know (yet) if you are a troll, or incapable of writing
clear English. Time will tell.
--
<http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt>
<http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423>
<http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html>
<http://kadaitcha.cx/vista/dogsbreakfast/index.html>
cbfalconer at maineline dot net
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
这篇关于死亡语言的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
