O / R Mapper [英] O/R Mapper

问题描述

我花时间学习使用强类型集合来代替

数据集/数据表并使用Enterprise Library Applictations块。


最近我发现有很多项目适用于o / r mapper，csla.net，

NHibrnate和其他许多人......

Actuly NHibrnate看起来比别人更独特，也更容易..

但是我不知道它是否是那里最有效的o / r映射器，或者我看起来好像是
更好的东西。


如果有人对这些地图制作者有所帮助，可以帮我找到最有效的解决方案..

thanx ...

I was spending time to learn the use of strongly typed collection instead
of Dataset/datatable and using Enterprise Library Applictations block..

Recently i discovered there is alot of project for o/r mapper, csla.net,
NHibrnate and many others..
Actuly NHibrnate is look unique than others for me and easier too..
But i don''t know if it''s the most efficient o/r mapper out there or i look
for something better.

Please if anyone have experince with these mappers may help me to find the
most efficient solutions..
thanx...

推荐答案

我对ORM爱恨交织。


一方面，我很感兴趣能够使用

面向OOP的类与DAL代码构造的想法。


另一方面，它们都有某种学习曲线。有一些

的新数量; DataObjects.net看起来很有前途：
http：// www .x-tensive.com / Products / DataObjects.NET /

EasyObjects.NET是另一个：
http://www.easyobjects.net/


然后你有Gentle.Net（sourceforge） .net）和你提到的那些。我认为这真的可归结为：我是否需要时间的承诺

需要真正掌握这一点并在我的
申请？

彼得

-

联合创始人，Eggheadcafe.com开发者门户网站：
< a rel =nofollowhref =http://www.eggheadcafe.comtarget =_ blank> http://www.eggheadcafe.com

UnBlog：
http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com



Islamegy ??写道：

I have a love-hate with ORMs.

On the one hand, I''m intrigued by the idea of being able to work with
OOP-oriented classes vs DAL code constructs.

On the other hand, they all have some sort of learning curve. There are a
number of new ones out; DataObjects.net looks promising:
http://www.x-tensive.com/Products/DataObjects.NET/

EasyObjects.NET is another:
http://www.easyobjects.net/

Then you have Gentle.Net (sourceforge.net) and the ones you mentioned. I
think it really boils down to this: Do I want to make the commitment of time
needed to really master this and use it on a continued basis in my
applications?
Peter
--
Co-founder, Eggheadcafe.com developer portal:
http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog:
http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com


"Islamegy??" wrote:

我花时间学习使用强类型集合来代替数据集/数据表并使用Enterprise Library Applictations块。
最近我发现有很多项目适用于o / r mapper，csla.net，
NHibrnate和其他许多人......
对于我而言，NHibrnate看起来比其他人更独特，也更容易。
但我不知道它是否是那里最有效的o / r映射器，或者我看起来更好的东西。

如果有人对这些映射器有经验可能帮我找到最有效的解决方案..
比...

I was spending time to learn the use of strongly typed collection instead
of Dataset/datatable and using Enterprise Library Applictations block..

Recently i discovered there is alot of project for o/r mapper, csla.net,
NHibrnate and many others..
Actuly NHibrnate is look unique than others for me and easier too..
But i don''t know if it''s the most efficient o/r mapper out there or i look
for something better.

Please if anyone have experince with these mappers may help me to find the
most efficient solutions..
thanx...

我也有一份爱情/讨厌的关系。我几个月来一直在使用DevExpress的XPO

。一方面很容易实现很多

的东西。我对复杂的查询等有一些保留意见以及缺乏

性能类型控制，但到目前为止这个项目已经顺利地进行了b / b
。当事情变得更加复杂时，事情会如何发展还有待观察。


Rob Trainer


Peter Bromberg [C＃MVP]" < PB ******* @ yahoo.nospammin.com>在消息中写道

新闻：5A ********************************** @ microsof t.com ...

I also have a love/hate relationship. I have been using XPO by DevExpress
for the lsat few months. On 1 hand it is very easy to implement a lot of
things. I have some reservations about complex queries, etc and the lack of
performance type control, but so far for this project it has been going
smoothly. It still remains to be seen how things will go when things become
more complex.

Rob Trainer

"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" <pb*******@yahoo.nospammin.com> wrote in message
news:5A**********************************@microsof t.com...

我对ORM爱恨交织。

一方面，我对能够与之合作的想法很感兴趣
面向OOP的类与DAL代码构造相比。

另一方面，它们都有某种学习曲线。有一些新的出来了; DataObjects.net看起来很有前途：
http：// www .x-tensive.com / Products / DataObjects.NET /

EasyObjects.NET是另一个：
http://www.easyobjects.net/
然后你有Gentle.Net（sourceforge.net）和你提到的那些。我认为它真的归结为：我是否需要做出真正掌握这一点并在我的
应用程序中持续使用所需的时间
？
Peter

-
联合创始人，Eggheadcafe.com开发者门户网站：
http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog：
http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com


Islamegy？写道：

I have a love-hate with ORMs.

On the one hand, I''m intrigued by the idea of being able to work with
OOP-oriented classes vs DAL code constructs.

On the other hand, they all have some sort of learning curve. There are a
number of new ones out; DataObjects.net looks promising:
http://www.x-tensive.com/Products/DataObjects.NET/

EasyObjects.NET is another:
http://www.easyobjects.net/

Then you have Gentle.Net (sourceforge.net) and the ones you mentioned. I
think it really boils down to this: Do I want to make the commitment of
time
needed to really master this and use it on a continued basis in my
applications?
Peter
--
Co-founder, Eggheadcafe.com developer portal:
http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog:
http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com


"Islamegy?" wrote:

我花时间学习使用强类型集合来代替数据集/数据表并使用Enterprise Library Applictations块。

最近我发现有很多项目适用于o / r mapper，csla.net，
NHibrnate和其他许多人......
对于我而言，NHibrnate看起来比其他人更独特，也更容易。 。
但我不知道它是否是最有效的o / r映射器或者我看起来更好的东西。

请如果有人对这些地图制作者有所帮助可能会帮助我找到最有效的解决方案..
thanx ...

I was spending time to learn the use of strongly typed collection
instead
of Dataset/datatable and using Enterprise Library Applictations block..

Recently i discovered there is alot of project for o/r mapper, csla.net,
NHibrnate and many others..
Actuly NHibrnate is look unique than others for me and easier too..
But i don''t know if it''s the most efficient o/r mapper out there or i
look
for something better.

Please if anyone have experince with these mappers may help me to find
the
most efficient solutions..
thanx...

强烈推荐LLBLGen Pro：

http://www.llblgen.com/

易于使用，并且有经验丰富的客户支持之一:)

Strongly recommending LLBLGen Pro:

http://www.llblgen.com/

Easy to use, and with one of greatest customer support ever experienced :)

这篇关于O / R Mapper的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！