Firefox问题 - CSS与FONT FACE [英] Firefox problem - CSS vs FONT FACE
问题描述
有一个页面显示Firefox 1.0渲染文本与CSS
不同，与一个特定字体的FONT FACE相比：
http://www.aczoom.com/fonts/xdvng.ttf 是不起作用的字体。
http://www.aczoom.com/isongs /0/t_ff.html
是测试页面 - 显示了行这是使用CSS来
指定xdvng：显示默认的英文字体而不是
xdvng。
Internet Explorer按预期工作 - CSS和FONT FACE使用
xdvng显示相同的文字。
我不确定我是否应该将此作为firefox的bug提交，或者如果这个
与之相关xdvng字体？
There is a page that shows Firefox 1.0 render text differently for CSS
as compared to FONT FACE for one particular font:
http://www.aczoom.com/fonts/xdvng.ttf is the font that does not work.
http://www.aczoom.com/isongs/0/t_ff.html
is the test page - that has shows the line "This is using CSS to
specify xdvng:" show up with the default english font instead of
xdvng.
Internet Explorer works as expected - both CSS and FONT FACE use of
xdvng displays identical text.
I am not sure if I should submit this as a bug for firefox, or if this
has something to do with the xdvng font?
推荐答案
您好，
您应该阅读此列表的常见问题解答。 （ http://css.nu/faq/ciwas-aFAQ.html）
克里斯
B Wooster写道：
Hi,
you should read the FAQ for this list. (http://css.nu/faq/ciwas-aFAQ.html)
Chris
B Wooster wrote:
有一个页面显示与一种特定字体的FONT FACE相比，Firefox 1.0以不同的方式呈现CSS
：
http://www.aczoom.com/fonts/xdvng.ttf 是不起作用的字体。
http://www.aczoom.com/isongs/0/t_ff.html
是测试页面 - 显示了行这是使用CSS来指定xdvng：显示默认的英文字体而不是
xdvng。
Internet Explorer按预期工作 - CSS和FONT FACE使用
xdvng显示相同的文本。
<我不确定我是否应该将此作为firefox的bug提交，或者这是否与xdvng字体有关？
There is a page that shows Firefox 1.0 render text differently for CSS
as compared to FONT FACE for one particular font:
http://www.aczoom.com/fonts/xdvng.ttf is the font that does not work.
http://www.aczoom.com/isongs/0/t_ff.html
is the test page - that has shows the line "This is using CSS to
specify xdvng:" show up with the default english font instead of
xdvng.
Internet Explorer works as expected - both CSS and FONT FACE use of
xdvng displays identical text.
I am not sure if I should submit this as a bug for firefox, or if this
has something to do with the xdvng font?
Chris Leipold< cl ****** @ dietzk.de>在消息新闻中写道：< 2v ************* @ uni-berlin.de> ...
Chris Leipold <cl******@dietzk.de> wrote in message news:<2v*************@uni-berlin.de>...
您应该阅读此列表的常见问题解答。 （ http://css.nu/faq/ciwas-aFAQ.html）
Chris
我读过常见问题解答，重新阅读你提到的页面 - 但我不确定
什么
你认为这适用于我的问题。
问题只是这个：拿任何浏览器，并使用
CSS定义文本和font-family，以及另外FONT FACE HTML标签。
他们应该以不同的方式呈现吗？
Firefox以不同的方式呈现文本。
我不确定我是否应该将此作为firefox的bug提交，或者如果这个
与xdvng字体有关 - 在这种情况下我将输入
firefox的bug报告。
另一方面，如果CSS字体系列有原因可以安全地支付
忽略系统中存在的字体，它不是firefox中的错误 -
但
我想了解原因！
B Wooste r写道：
you should read the FAQ for this list. (http://css.nu/faq/ciwas-aFAQ.html)
Chris
I did read the FAQs, re-read the page you mention - but I am not sure
what
you think in there applies to my question.
The question simply is this: take any browser, and text defined using
CSS and font-family, and alternately FONT FACE HTML tag.
Should they render differently?
Firefox renders that text differently.
I am not sure if I should submit this as a bug for firefox, or if this
has something to do with the xdvng font - in which case I will enter a
bug report for firefox.
On the other hand, if there is a reason why a CSS font-family can
safely
ignore a font that exists on the system, it is not a bug in firefox -
but
I would like to understand why!
B Wooster wrote:
有一个页面显示Firefox 1.0渲染文本与CSS相比
与一个特定字体的FONT FACE相比：
http://www.aczoom.com/fonts/xdvng.ttf 是字体这不起作用。
http：/ /www.aczoom.com/isongs/0/t_ff.html
是测试页面 - 显示的行这是使用CSS来指定xdvng：.. ...
There is a page that shows Firefox 1.0 render text differently for CSS
as compared to FONT FACE for one particular font:
http://www.aczoom.com/fonts/xdvng.ttf is the font that does not work.
http://www.aczoom.com/isongs/0/t_ff.html
is the test page - that has shows the line "This is using CSS to
specify xdvng:".....
2004年11月10日10:16:35 -0800，B Wooster写道：
On 10 Nov 2004 10:16:35 -0800, B Wooster wrote:
Chris Leipold< cl ****** @ dietzk.de>在消息新闻中写道：< 2v ************* @ uni-berlin.de> ...
Chris Leipold <cl******@dietzk.de> wrote in message news:<2v*************@uni-berlin.de>...
您应该阅读此列表的常见问题解答。 （ http://css.nu/faq/ciwas-aFAQ.html）
Chris
you should read the FAQ for this list. (http://css.nu/faq/ciwas-aFAQ.html)
Chris
我确实阅读了常见问题解答，重新阅读了你提到的页面 - 但我不确定
你认为是什么在那里适用于我的问题。
I did read the FAQs, re-read the page you mention - but I am not sure
what
you think in there applies to my question.
克里斯可能一直在考虑这个（非常重要的）部分..
< http： //css.nu/faq/ciwas-aFAQ.html#QA11>
哪一个很快就会导致...
< http：// validator .w3.org / check？uri = http％3A％2F％2Fwww.aczoom.com％2Fisongs％2F0％2Ft_ff.html& charset = iso-8859-1 +％28Western + Europe％29>
HTH
-
Andrew Thompson
http://www.PhySci.org/codes/ Web& IT帮助
http://www.PhySci.org/ 开源软件套件
http://www.1point1C.org/ Science&技术
http://www.LensEscapes.com/ 图像逃脱世俗的
Chris may well have been thinking of this (very important) section..
<http://css.nu/faq/ciwas-aFAQ.html#QA11>
Which soon leads one to..
<http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aczoom.com%2Fisongs%2F0 %2Ft_ff.html&charset=iso-8859-1+%28Western+Europe%29>
HTH
--
Andrew Thompson
http://www.PhySci.org/codes/ Web & IT Help
http://www.PhySci.org/ Open-source software suite
http://www.1point1C.org/ Science & Technology
http://www.LensEscapes.com/ Images that escape the mundane
这篇关于Firefox问题 - CSS与FONT FACE的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
