方法和成员函数之间的区别 [英] Distinction between a method and a member function
问题描述
我在C ++ Gotchas中看到了一个细节。作者：Stephen Dewhurst让我很困惑
。作者说：
''C ++没有方法。 Java和Smalltalk有方法。当你谈到
一个面向对象的设计并且感觉特别自命不凡时，你可以使用术语消息来表示。和方法，但是当你开始讨论你的设计的b ++ b ++实现时，请使用术语函数调用。和
会员功能。''
他没有说的是方法与会员之间的区别
功能是。
此外，我查看了C ++常见问题解答和该组的存档，
并且都没有提及区别。这个组中有不少帖子
似乎可以互换使用这些术语。
有人能简单解释一下这有什么区别吗？
Tim
Hi,
I came across a detail in "C++ Gotchas" by Stephen Dewhurst that confused me
a bit. The author states:
''C++ has no "methods." Java and Smalltalk have methods. When you talk about
an object-oriented design and are feeling particularly pretentious, you may
use the terms "message" and "method," but when you get down to discussing a
C++ implementation of your design, use the terms "function call" and
"member function."''
What he doesn''t say is what the difference between a method and a member
function is.
Furthermore, I''ve looked through the C++ FAQ and the archive of this group,
and neither mention the distinction. Quite a few posts in this group do
seem to use the terms interchangably.
Can anyone explain briefly what the difference is?
Tim
推荐答案
On Sun，2003年8月31日11:56:24 +0000（UTC），Tim Martin< ta ***@cam.ac.uk>写道：
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 11:56:24 +0000 (UTC), Tim Martin <ta***@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
我在C ++ Gotchas中看到了一个细节。作者：Stephen Dewhurst让我有点困惑。作者指出：
''C ++没有方法。 Java和Smalltalk有方法。当你谈到面向对象的设计并且感觉特别自命不凡时，你可以使用术语消息。和方法，但是，当您开始讨论设计的C ++实现时，请使用术语函数调用。和
成员函数。''
他没有说的是方法和成员之间的区别是什么。
此外，我已经查看了C ++ FAQ和该组的档案，
并没有提到这种区别。这个小组中有不少帖子似乎可以互换使用这些术语。
任何人都能简单解释一下这有什么区别吗？
Hi,
I came across a detail in "C++ Gotchas" by Stephen Dewhurst that confused me
a bit. The author states:
''C++ has no "methods." Java and Smalltalk have methods. When you talk about
an object-oriented design and are feeling particularly pretentious, you may
use the terms "message" and "method," but when you get down to discussing a
C++ implementation of your design, use the terms "function call" and
"member function."''
What he doesn''t say is what the difference between a method and a member
function is.
Furthermore, I''ve looked through the C++ FAQ and the archive of this group,
and neither mention the distinction. Quite a few posts in this group do
seem to use the terms interchangably.
Can anyone explain briefly what the difference is?
没有。但是，在C ++中，术语是成员函数。在Java中，
术语是方法。不同的语言，不同的术语。
C ++标准使用术语成员函数，并坚持使用域中使用的
约定来协助通信。
-
Sam Holden
There isn''t any. However, in C++ the term is member function. In Java the
term is method. Different language, different lingo.
The C++ standard uses the term member function, and sticking with the
convention used in a domain assists communication.
--
Sam Holden
Tim Martin写道：
Tim Martin writes:
我在C ++ Gotchas中看到了一个细节。斯蒂芬·德赫斯特（Stephen Dewhurst）让我感到困惑。作者指出：
''C ++没有方法。 Java和Smalltalk有方法。当你谈论面向对象设计的
并且感觉特别自命不凡时，你b $ b可能会使用术语消息。和方法，但是当你开始讨论你的设计的C ++实现
时，请使用术语函数调用。和
成员函数。''
他没有说的是方法和成员之间的区别是什么。
此外，我查看了这个
组的C ++ FAQ和存档，但都没有提到这个区别。这个小组中有不少帖子似乎可以互换使用这些术语。
任何人都能简单解释一下这有什么区别吗？
I came across a detail in "C++ Gotchas" by Stephen Dewhurst that confused me a bit. The author states:
''C++ has no "methods." Java and Smalltalk have methods. When you talk about an object-oriented design and are feeling particularly pretentious, you may use the terms "message" and "method," but when you get down to discussing a C++ implementation of your design, use the terms "function call" and
"member function."''
What he doesn''t say is what the difference between a method and a member
function is.
Furthermore, I''ve looked through the C++ FAQ and the archive of this group, and neither mention the distinction. Quite a few posts in this group do
seem to use the terms interchangably.
Can anyone explain briefly what the difference is?
就我而言，方法是Smalltalk行话和成员函数
是C ++术语。
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c ++上有一个最近的43消息主题，大部分都没有意义。在搜索它时，我注意到几年前的125消息线程
。我怀疑这是茶壶中的暴风雨。
我正在使用一个名为Lookout Express的原始微软程序，所以这个链接
可能会搞砸了。
http://www.google.com/groups?hl=zh-CN&l...=bi38c9%249dg%
241％40titan.btinternet.com& rnum = 1& prev = / groups％3Fq％3Dmember％2Bsmalltalk％2Bgr
oup：alt.comp.lang.learn.cc％252B％252B％26num％3D20％26hl％3Den％26lr％3Dlang_en％ 26
即％3DUTF-8％26sa％3DG％26scoring％3Dd
As far as I am concerned "method" is Smalltalk jargon and "member function"
is C++ jargon. There is a recent,43 message thread, mostly pointless, on
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++. In searching for it I noted a 125 message thread
from a couple years ago. I suspect this was the same tempest in a teapot.
I am using a primitive Microsoft program called Lookout Express so this link
will probably be messed up.
http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&l...=bi38c9%249dg%
241%40titan.btinternet.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dmember%2Bsmalltalk%2Bgr
oup:alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c%252B%252B%26num%3D20%26hl%3Den%26lr%3Dlang_en%26
ie%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG%26scoring%3Dd
" Tim Martin" < TA *** @ cam.ac.uk>在消息中写道
新闻：bi ********** @ hercules.btinternet.com ...
"Tim Martin" <ta***@cam.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:bi**********@hercules.btinternet.com...
我在C ++ Gotchas中看到了一个细节。斯蒂芬·德赫斯特（Stephen Dewhurst）让我感到困惑。作者指出：
''C ++没有方法。 Java和Smalltalk有方法。当你谈论面向对象设计的
并且感觉特别自命不凡时，你b $ b可能会使用术语消息。和方法，但是当你开始讨论你的设计的C ++实现
时，请使用术语函数调用。和
成员函数。''
他没有说的是方法和成员之间的区别是什么。
此外，我查看了这个
组的C ++ FAQ和存档，但都没有提到这个区别。这个小组中有不少帖子似乎可以互换使用这些术语。
任何人都能简单解释一下有什么区别吗？
Tim
Hi,
I came across a detail in "C++ Gotchas" by Stephen Dewhurst that confused me a bit. The author states:
''C++ has no "methods." Java and Smalltalk have methods. When you talk about an object-oriented design and are feeling particularly pretentious, you may use the terms "message" and "method," but when you get down to discussing a C++ implementation of your design, use the terms "function call" and
"member function."''
What he doesn''t say is what the difference between a method and a member
function is.
Furthermore, I''ve looked through the C++ FAQ and the archive of this group, and neither mention the distinction. Quite a few posts in this group do
seem to use the terms interchangably.
Can anyone explain briefly what the difference is?
Tim
作者似乎对一些不存在
的细节很迂腐。在谈论C ++时经常使用成员函数，但在实际中它们都是可互换的描述*，并传达了对某个对象的某些操作的概念。这基本上是一个术语问题。
*除非或许，你在谈论每个
语言的一般主题的体现之间的差异;在这种情况下，可能一致地使用不同的术语是有用的
。
The author appears to be pedantic about some detail that does not really
exist. Member functions are often used when talking about C++, but in
reality they are all interchangeable descriptions*, and convey the notion of
some action on an object. It is, basically a question of terminology.
* Unless perhaps, you are talking about the differences between each
languages'' embodiment of the general theme; In that case maybe it''s useful
to use different terminology consistently.
这篇关于方法和成员函数之间的区别的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
